Cargando…

Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE: Refractory status epilepticus is a serious condition in which seizure continues despite use of two antiepileptic medications. Retrospective studies have shown that 29%‐43% of SE patients progress into RSE despite treatment. Mortality following RSE is high. We aimed to evaluate the predict...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kafle, Dilli Ram, Avinash, Appu Jha, Shrestha, Aashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12394
_version_ 1783543354895630336
author Kafle, Dilli Ram
Avinash, Appu Jha
Shrestha, Aashish
author_facet Kafle, Dilli Ram
Avinash, Appu Jha
Shrestha, Aashish
author_sort Kafle, Dilli Ram
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Refractory status epilepticus is a serious condition in which seizure continues despite use of two antiepileptic medications. Retrospective studies have shown that 29%‐43% of SE patients progress into RSE despite treatment. Mortality following RSE is high. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of outcome in patients with RSE at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Sixty‐eight consecutive patients with RSE who presented to our hospital between February 2018 and January 2020 were evaluated for outcome. RESULT: In our study 28(41.2%), patients who failed to respond to first‐ and second‐line antiepileptic drug responded to the third‐line antiepileptic drug thus avoiding mechanical ventilation and intravenous anesthesia. Low GCS at admission (P < .001), need for mechanical ventilation and intravenous anesthesia (P = .018), and long duration of RSE before recovery (P = .035) were strongly associated with worse outcome. Duration of RSE before starting treatment (P = .147), previous history of seizure (P = .717), and age of the patient (P = .319) did not influence the outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: In our study, we prospectively evaluated patients with RSE and followed them for one month after discharge from the hospital. Unlike some of the previous studies, we identified an interesting finding whereby a significant proportion of the patients responded to the third‐line antiepileptic drug and thus avoiding the complications related to mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72785392020-06-09 Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus Kafle, Dilli Ram Avinash, Appu Jha Shrestha, Aashish Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: Refractory status epilepticus is a serious condition in which seizure continues despite use of two antiepileptic medications. Retrospective studies have shown that 29%‐43% of SE patients progress into RSE despite treatment. Mortality following RSE is high. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of outcome in patients with RSE at a tertiary care center. METHODS: Sixty‐eight consecutive patients with RSE who presented to our hospital between February 2018 and January 2020 were evaluated for outcome. RESULT: In our study 28(41.2%), patients who failed to respond to first‐ and second‐line antiepileptic drug responded to the third‐line antiepileptic drug thus avoiding mechanical ventilation and intravenous anesthesia. Low GCS at admission (P < .001), need for mechanical ventilation and intravenous anesthesia (P = .018), and long duration of RSE before recovery (P = .035) were strongly associated with worse outcome. Duration of RSE before starting treatment (P = .147), previous history of seizure (P = .717), and age of the patient (P = .319) did not influence the outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: In our study, we prospectively evaluated patients with RSE and followed them for one month after discharge from the hospital. Unlike some of the previous studies, we identified an interesting finding whereby a significant proportion of the patients responded to the third‐line antiepileptic drug and thus avoiding the complications related to mechanical ventilation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7278539/ /pubmed/32524050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12394 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Kafle, Dilli Ram
Avinash, Appu Jha
Shrestha, Aashish
Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus
title Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus
title_full Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus
title_fullStr Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus
title_short Predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus
title_sort predictors of outcome in refractory generalized convulsive status epilepticus
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12394
work_keys_str_mv AT kafledilliram predictorsofoutcomeinrefractorygeneralizedconvulsivestatusepilepticus
AT avinashappujha predictorsofoutcomeinrefractorygeneralizedconvulsivestatusepilepticus
AT shresthaaashish predictorsofoutcomeinrefractorygeneralizedconvulsivestatusepilepticus