Cargando…

Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: Neurostimulation devices that deliver electrical impulses to the nervous system are widely used to treat seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, but the effects of these therapies on sleep are incompletely understood. Vagus nerve stimulation can contribute to obstructive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruoff, Leslie, Jarosiewicz, Beata, Zak, Rochelle, Tcheng, Thomas K., Neylan, Thomas C., Rao, Vikram R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12382
_version_ 1783543355128414208
author Ruoff, Leslie
Jarosiewicz, Beata
Zak, Rochelle
Tcheng, Thomas K.
Neylan, Thomas C.
Rao, Vikram R.
author_facet Ruoff, Leslie
Jarosiewicz, Beata
Zak, Rochelle
Tcheng, Thomas K.
Neylan, Thomas C.
Rao, Vikram R.
author_sort Ruoff, Leslie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Neurostimulation devices that deliver electrical impulses to the nervous system are widely used to treat seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, but the effects of these therapies on sleep are incompletely understood. Vagus nerve stimulation can contribute to obstructive sleep apnea, and thalamic deep brain stimulation can cause sleep disruption. A device for brain‐responsive neurostimulation (RNS(®) System, NeuroPace, Inc) is well tolerated in clinical trials, but potential effects on sleep are unknown. METHODS: Six adults with medically refractory focal epilepsy treated for at least six months with the RNS System underwent a single night of polysomnography (PSG). RNS System lead locations included mesial temporal and neocortical targets. Sleep stages and arousals were scored according to standard guidelines. Stimulations delivered by the RNS System in response to detections of epileptiform activity were identified by artifacts on scalp electroencephalography. RESULTS: One subject was excluded for technical reasons related to unreliable identification of stimulation artifact on EEG during PSG. In the remaining five subjects, PSG showed fragmented sleep with frequent arousals. Arousal histograms aligned to stimulations revealed a significant peak in arousals just before stimulation. In one of these subjects, the arousal peak began before stimulation and extended ~1 seconds after stimulation. A peak in arousals occurring only after stimulation was not observed. SIGNIFICANCE: In this small cohort of patients, brain‐responsive neurostimulation does not appear to disrupt sleep. If confirmed in larger studies, this could represent a potential clinical advantage of brain‐responsive neurostimulation over other neurostimulation modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72785402020-06-09 Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy Ruoff, Leslie Jarosiewicz, Beata Zak, Rochelle Tcheng, Thomas K. Neylan, Thomas C. Rao, Vikram R. Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: Neurostimulation devices that deliver electrical impulses to the nervous system are widely used to treat seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, but the effects of these therapies on sleep are incompletely understood. Vagus nerve stimulation can contribute to obstructive sleep apnea, and thalamic deep brain stimulation can cause sleep disruption. A device for brain‐responsive neurostimulation (RNS(®) System, NeuroPace, Inc) is well tolerated in clinical trials, but potential effects on sleep are unknown. METHODS: Six adults with medically refractory focal epilepsy treated for at least six months with the RNS System underwent a single night of polysomnography (PSG). RNS System lead locations included mesial temporal and neocortical targets. Sleep stages and arousals were scored according to standard guidelines. Stimulations delivered by the RNS System in response to detections of epileptiform activity were identified by artifacts on scalp electroencephalography. RESULTS: One subject was excluded for technical reasons related to unreliable identification of stimulation artifact on EEG during PSG. In the remaining five subjects, PSG showed fragmented sleep with frequent arousals. Arousal histograms aligned to stimulations revealed a significant peak in arousals just before stimulation. In one of these subjects, the arousal peak began before stimulation and extended ~1 seconds after stimulation. A peak in arousals occurring only after stimulation was not observed. SIGNIFICANCE: In this small cohort of patients, brain‐responsive neurostimulation does not appear to disrupt sleep. If confirmed in larger studies, this could represent a potential clinical advantage of brain‐responsive neurostimulation over other neurostimulation modalities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7278540/ /pubmed/32524041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12382 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Ruoff, Leslie
Jarosiewicz, Beata
Zak, Rochelle
Tcheng, Thomas K.
Neylan, Thomas C.
Rao, Vikram R.
Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy
title Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy
title_full Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy
title_fullStr Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy
title_short Sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy
title_sort sleep disruption is not observed with brain‐responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12382
work_keys_str_mv AT ruoffleslie sleepdisruptionisnotobservedwithbrainresponsiveneurostimulationforepilepsy
AT jarosiewiczbeata sleepdisruptionisnotobservedwithbrainresponsiveneurostimulationforepilepsy
AT zakrochelle sleepdisruptionisnotobservedwithbrainresponsiveneurostimulationforepilepsy
AT tchengthomask sleepdisruptionisnotobservedwithbrainresponsiveneurostimulationforepilepsy
AT neylanthomasc sleepdisruptionisnotobservedwithbrainresponsiveneurostimulationforepilepsy
AT raovikramr sleepdisruptionisnotobservedwithbrainresponsiveneurostimulationforepilepsy