Cargando…

Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada

This commentary explores public health (PH) investments in Quebec and underlines the challenge of tracking PH resources across Canada. We analyzed governmental data to compare investments across all health and social programs in Quebec from 2004–2005 to 2017–2018. The province’s PH budgets suffered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiset-Laniel, Julie, Guyon, Ak’ingabe, Perreault, Robert, Strumpf, Erin C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514719
http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00342-1
_version_ 1783543407658926080
author Fiset-Laniel, Julie
Guyon, Ak’ingabe
Perreault, Robert
Strumpf, Erin C.
author_facet Fiset-Laniel, Julie
Guyon, Ak’ingabe
Perreault, Robert
Strumpf, Erin C.
author_sort Fiset-Laniel, Julie
collection PubMed
description This commentary explores public health (PH) investments in Quebec and underlines the challenge of tracking PH resources across Canada. We analyzed governmental data to compare investments across all health and social programs in Quebec from 2004–2005 to 2017–2018. The province’s PH budgets suffered from disproportionately low investments and abrupt cuts. These cuts were the largest among all health programs in 2015–2016 (− 7.1%). PH budgets did not keep up with inflation and, in constant dollars, have declined over the last decade. Furthermore, their evolution over the span of 14 years significantly differed from other health programs. On average, programs providing direct services experienced overall budget increases of 81%, whereas PH budgets had the lowest increase of all such programs at only 46%. PH suffers from serious erosion of its capacity. Unfortunately, there is a dire lack of comparable data for provincial, national, and international PH budgets, which further complicates the monitoring of PH erosion. We contend that systematic tracking of PH budgets remains profoundly inadequate across Canada. We recommend (1) regular, comprehensive, and publicly reported analyses of PH budgets; (2) in-depth comparisons of PH investments across Canadian jurisdictions; and (3) a strong PH systems and services research agenda for Canada.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72787672020-06-09 Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada Fiset-Laniel, Julie Guyon, Ak’ingabe Perreault, Robert Strumpf, Erin C. Can J Public Health Special Section on COVID-19: Commentary This commentary explores public health (PH) investments in Quebec and underlines the challenge of tracking PH resources across Canada. We analyzed governmental data to compare investments across all health and social programs in Quebec from 2004–2005 to 2017–2018. The province’s PH budgets suffered from disproportionately low investments and abrupt cuts. These cuts were the largest among all health programs in 2015–2016 (− 7.1%). PH budgets did not keep up with inflation and, in constant dollars, have declined over the last decade. Furthermore, their evolution over the span of 14 years significantly differed from other health programs. On average, programs providing direct services experienced overall budget increases of 81%, whereas PH budgets had the lowest increase of all such programs at only 46%. PH suffers from serious erosion of its capacity. Unfortunately, there is a dire lack of comparable data for provincial, national, and international PH budgets, which further complicates the monitoring of PH erosion. We contend that systematic tracking of PH budgets remains profoundly inadequate across Canada. We recommend (1) regular, comprehensive, and publicly reported analyses of PH budgets; (2) in-depth comparisons of PH investments across Canadian jurisdictions; and (3) a strong PH systems and services research agenda for Canada. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7278767/ /pubmed/32514719 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00342-1 Text en © The Canadian Public Health Association 2020
spellingShingle Special Section on COVID-19: Commentary
Fiset-Laniel, Julie
Guyon, Ak’ingabe
Perreault, Robert
Strumpf, Erin C.
Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada
title Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada
title_full Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada
title_fullStr Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada
title_full_unstemmed Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada
title_short Public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? Historical trends in Quebec and implications for Canada
title_sort public health investments: neglect or wilful omission? historical trends in quebec and implications for canada
topic Special Section on COVID-19: Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514719
http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-020-00342-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fisetlanieljulie publichealthinvestmentsneglectorwilfulomissionhistoricaltrendsinquebecandimplicationsforcanada
AT guyonakingabe publichealthinvestmentsneglectorwilfulomissionhistoricaltrendsinquebecandimplicationsforcanada
AT perreaultrobert publichealthinvestmentsneglectorwilfulomissionhistoricaltrendsinquebecandimplicationsforcanada
AT strumpferinc publichealthinvestmentsneglectorwilfulomissionhistoricaltrendsinquebecandimplicationsforcanada