Cargando…
Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S
The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)—analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzym...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103529 |
_version_ | 1783543449035735040 |
---|---|
author | Zaborowska, Magdalena Wyszkowska, Jadwiga Borowik, Agata |
author_facet | Zaborowska, Magdalena Wyszkowska, Jadwiga Borowik, Agata |
author_sort | Zaborowska, Magdalena |
collection | PubMed |
description | The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)—analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzymatic activity. The following parameters were determined in soil uncontaminated and contaminated with BPA, BPF, and BPS: the count of eleven groups of microorganisms, colony development (CD) index, microorganism ecophysiological diversity (EP) index, genetic diversity of bacteria and activity of dehydrogenases (Deh), urease (Ure), catalase (Cat), acid phosphatase (Pac), alkaline phosphatase (Pal), arylsulphatase (Aryl) and β-glucosidase (Glu). Bisphenols A, S and F significantly disrupted the soil homeostasis. BPF is regarded as the most toxic, followed by BPS and BPA. BPF and BPS reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and increased that of Actinobacteria. Unique types of bacteria were identified as well as the characteristics of each bisphenol: Lysobacter, Steroidobacter, Variovorax, Mycoplana, for BPA, Caldilinea, Arthrobacter, Cellulosimicrobium and Promicromonospora for BPF and Dactylosporangium Geodermatophilus, Sphingopyxis for BPS. Considering the strength of a negative impact of bisphenols on the soil biochemical activity, they can be arranged as follows: BPS > BPF > BPA. Urease and arylsulphatase proved to be the most susceptible and dehydrogenases the least susceptible to bisphenols pressure, regardless of the study duration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7278947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72789472020-06-15 Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S Zaborowska, Magdalena Wyszkowska, Jadwiga Borowik, Agata Int J Mol Sci Article The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)—analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzymatic activity. The following parameters were determined in soil uncontaminated and contaminated with BPA, BPF, and BPS: the count of eleven groups of microorganisms, colony development (CD) index, microorganism ecophysiological diversity (EP) index, genetic diversity of bacteria and activity of dehydrogenases (Deh), urease (Ure), catalase (Cat), acid phosphatase (Pac), alkaline phosphatase (Pal), arylsulphatase (Aryl) and β-glucosidase (Glu). Bisphenols A, S and F significantly disrupted the soil homeostasis. BPF is regarded as the most toxic, followed by BPS and BPA. BPF and BPS reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and increased that of Actinobacteria. Unique types of bacteria were identified as well as the characteristics of each bisphenol: Lysobacter, Steroidobacter, Variovorax, Mycoplana, for BPA, Caldilinea, Arthrobacter, Cellulosimicrobium and Promicromonospora for BPF and Dactylosporangium Geodermatophilus, Sphingopyxis for BPS. Considering the strength of a negative impact of bisphenols on the soil biochemical activity, they can be arranged as follows: BPS > BPF > BPA. Urease and arylsulphatase proved to be the most susceptible and dehydrogenases the least susceptible to bisphenols pressure, regardless of the study duration. MDPI 2020-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7278947/ /pubmed/32429402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103529 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zaborowska, Magdalena Wyszkowska, Jadwiga Borowik, Agata Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S |
title | Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S |
title_full | Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S |
title_fullStr | Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S |
title_full_unstemmed | Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S |
title_short | Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S |
title_sort | soil microbiome response to contamination with bisphenol a, bisphenol f and bisphenol s |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaborowskamagdalena soilmicrobiomeresponsetocontaminationwithbisphenolabisphenolfandbisphenols AT wyszkowskajadwiga soilmicrobiomeresponsetocontaminationwithbisphenolabisphenolfandbisphenols AT borowikagata soilmicrobiomeresponsetocontaminationwithbisphenolabisphenolfandbisphenols |