Cargando…

Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S

The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)—analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzym...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaborowska, Magdalena, Wyszkowska, Jadwiga, Borowik, Agata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103529
_version_ 1783543449035735040
author Zaborowska, Magdalena
Wyszkowska, Jadwiga
Borowik, Agata
author_facet Zaborowska, Magdalena
Wyszkowska, Jadwiga
Borowik, Agata
author_sort Zaborowska, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)—analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzymatic activity. The following parameters were determined in soil uncontaminated and contaminated with BPA, BPF, and BPS: the count of eleven groups of microorganisms, colony development (CD) index, microorganism ecophysiological diversity (EP) index, genetic diversity of bacteria and activity of dehydrogenases (Deh), urease (Ure), catalase (Cat), acid phosphatase (Pac), alkaline phosphatase (Pal), arylsulphatase (Aryl) and β-glucosidase (Glu). Bisphenols A, S and F significantly disrupted the soil homeostasis. BPF is regarded as the most toxic, followed by BPS and BPA. BPF and BPS reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and increased that of Actinobacteria. Unique types of bacteria were identified as well as the characteristics of each bisphenol: Lysobacter, Steroidobacter, Variovorax, Mycoplana, for BPA, Caldilinea, Arthrobacter, Cellulosimicrobium and Promicromonospora for BPF and Dactylosporangium Geodermatophilus, Sphingopyxis for BPS. Considering the strength of a negative impact of bisphenols on the soil biochemical activity, they can be arranged as follows: BPS > BPF > BPA. Urease and arylsulphatase proved to be the most susceptible and dehydrogenases the least susceptible to bisphenols pressure, regardless of the study duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72789472020-06-15 Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S Zaborowska, Magdalena Wyszkowska, Jadwiga Borowik, Agata Int J Mol Sci Article The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)—analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzymatic activity. The following parameters were determined in soil uncontaminated and contaminated with BPA, BPF, and BPS: the count of eleven groups of microorganisms, colony development (CD) index, microorganism ecophysiological diversity (EP) index, genetic diversity of bacteria and activity of dehydrogenases (Deh), urease (Ure), catalase (Cat), acid phosphatase (Pac), alkaline phosphatase (Pal), arylsulphatase (Aryl) and β-glucosidase (Glu). Bisphenols A, S and F significantly disrupted the soil homeostasis. BPF is regarded as the most toxic, followed by BPS and BPA. BPF and BPS reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and increased that of Actinobacteria. Unique types of bacteria were identified as well as the characteristics of each bisphenol: Lysobacter, Steroidobacter, Variovorax, Mycoplana, for BPA, Caldilinea, Arthrobacter, Cellulosimicrobium and Promicromonospora for BPF and Dactylosporangium Geodermatophilus, Sphingopyxis for BPS. Considering the strength of a negative impact of bisphenols on the soil biochemical activity, they can be arranged as follows: BPS > BPF > BPA. Urease and arylsulphatase proved to be the most susceptible and dehydrogenases the least susceptible to bisphenols pressure, regardless of the study duration. MDPI 2020-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7278947/ /pubmed/32429402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103529 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zaborowska, Magdalena
Wyszkowska, Jadwiga
Borowik, Agata
Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S
title Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S
title_full Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S
title_fullStr Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S
title_full_unstemmed Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S
title_short Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S
title_sort soil microbiome response to contamination with bisphenol a, bisphenol f and bisphenol s
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103529
work_keys_str_mv AT zaborowskamagdalena soilmicrobiomeresponsetocontaminationwithbisphenolabisphenolfandbisphenols
AT wyszkowskajadwiga soilmicrobiomeresponsetocontaminationwithbisphenolabisphenolfandbisphenols
AT borowikagata soilmicrobiomeresponsetocontaminationwithbisphenolabisphenolfandbisphenols