Cargando…

Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?

INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Aditya Prakash, Narain, Tushar Aditya, Devana, Sudheer Kumar, Tyagi, Shantanu, Parmar, Kalpesh M., Bora, Girdhar Singh, Mavuduru, Ravimohan S., Singh, Shrawan Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549663
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_333_19
_version_ 1783543483431124992
author Sharma, Aditya Prakash
Narain, Tushar Aditya
Devana, Sudheer Kumar
Tyagi, Shantanu
Parmar, Kalpesh M.
Bora, Girdhar Singh
Mavuduru, Ravimohan S.
Singh, Shrawan Kumar
author_facet Sharma, Aditya Prakash
Narain, Tushar Aditya
Devana, Sudheer Kumar
Tyagi, Shantanu
Parmar, Kalpesh M.
Bora, Girdhar Singh
Mavuduru, Ravimohan S.
Singh, Shrawan Kumar
author_sort Sharma, Aditya Prakash
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ambispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). RESULTS: Median age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome. CONCLUSION: Penile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7279096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72790962020-06-16 Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? Sharma, Aditya Prakash Narain, Tushar Aditya Devana, Sudheer Kumar Tyagi, Shantanu Parmar, Kalpesh M. Bora, Girdhar Singh Mavuduru, Ravimohan S. Singh, Shrawan Kumar Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ambispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). RESULTS: Median age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome. CONCLUSION: Penile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7279096/ /pubmed/32549663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_333_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Aditya Prakash
Narain, Tushar Aditya
Devana, Sudheer Kumar
Tyagi, Shantanu
Parmar, Kalpesh M.
Bora, Girdhar Singh
Mavuduru, Ravimohan S.
Singh, Shrawan Kumar
Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_full Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_fullStr Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_short Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
title_sort clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: is no news good news?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549663
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_333_19
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaadityaprakash clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT naraintusharaditya clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT devanasudheerkumar clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT tyagishantanu clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT parmarkalpeshm clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT boragirdharsingh clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT mavudururavimohans clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews
AT singhshrawankumar clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews