Cargando…
Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?
INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_333_19 |
_version_ | 1783543483431124992 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Aditya Prakash Narain, Tushar Aditya Devana, Sudheer Kumar Tyagi, Shantanu Parmar, Kalpesh M. Bora, Girdhar Singh Mavuduru, Ravimohan S. Singh, Shrawan Kumar |
author_facet | Sharma, Aditya Prakash Narain, Tushar Aditya Devana, Sudheer Kumar Tyagi, Shantanu Parmar, Kalpesh M. Bora, Girdhar Singh Mavuduru, Ravimohan S. Singh, Shrawan Kumar |
author_sort | Sharma, Aditya Prakash |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ambispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). RESULTS: Median age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome. CONCLUSION: Penile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7279096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72790962020-06-16 Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? Sharma, Aditya Prakash Narain, Tushar Aditya Devana, Sudheer Kumar Tyagi, Shantanu Parmar, Kalpesh M. Bora, Girdhar Singh Mavuduru, Ravimohan S. Singh, Shrawan Kumar Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ambispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). RESULTS: Median age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome. CONCLUSION: Penile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7279096/ /pubmed/32549663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_333_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharma, Aditya Prakash Narain, Tushar Aditya Devana, Sudheer Kumar Tyagi, Shantanu Parmar, Kalpesh M. Bora, Girdhar Singh Mavuduru, Ravimohan S. Singh, Shrawan Kumar Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? |
title | Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? |
title_full | Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? |
title_fullStr | Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? |
title_short | Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news? |
title_sort | clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: is no news good news? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32549663 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_333_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaadityaprakash clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews AT naraintusharaditya clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews AT devanasudheerkumar clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews AT tyagishantanu clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews AT parmarkalpeshm clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews AT boragirdharsingh clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews AT mavudururavimohans clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews AT singhshrawankumar clinicalspectrumdiagnosisandsexualdysfunctionafterrepairoffracturepenisisnonewsgoodnews |