Cargando…

Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum

BACKGROUND: Non-healing bovine foot lesions, including non-healing white line disease, non-healing sole ulcer and toe necrosis, are an increasingly important cause of chronic lameness that are poorly responsive to treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated a high-level association between these non...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staton, Gareth James, Sullivan, Leigh Emma, Blowey, Roger W, Carter, Stuart D, Evans, Nicholas James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105628
_version_ 1783543487873941504
author Staton, Gareth James
Sullivan, Leigh Emma
Blowey, Roger W
Carter, Stuart D
Evans, Nicholas James
author_facet Staton, Gareth James
Sullivan, Leigh Emma
Blowey, Roger W
Carter, Stuart D
Evans, Nicholas James
author_sort Staton, Gareth James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-healing bovine foot lesions, including non-healing white line disease, non-healing sole ulcer and toe necrosis, are an increasingly important cause of chronic lameness that are poorly responsive to treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated a high-level association between these non-healing lesions and the Treponema phylogroups implicated in bovine digital dermatitis (BDD). However, a polymicrobial aetiology involving other gram-stain-negative anaerobes is suspected. METHODS: A PCR-based bacteriological survey of uncomplicated BDD lesions (n=10) and non-healing bovine foot lesions (n=10) targeting Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Dichelobacter nodosus and Treponema pallidum/T. paraluiscuniculi was performed. RESULTS: P. endodontalis DNA was detected in 80.0% of the non-healing lesion biopsies (p=<0.001) but was entirely absent from uncomplicated BDD lesion biopsies. When compared to the BDD lesions, F. necrophorum was detected at a higher frequency in the non-healing lesions (33.3% vs 70.0%, respectively), whereas D. nodosus was detected at a lower frequency (55.5% vs 20.0%, respectively). Conversely, T. pallidum/T. paraluiscuniculi DNA was not detected in either lesion type. CONCLUSION: The data from this pilot study suggest that P. endodontalis and F. necrophorum should be further investigated as potential aetiological agents of non-healing bovine foot lesions. A failure to detect syphilis treponemes in either lesion type is reassuring given the potential public health implications such an infection would present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7279135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72791352020-06-15 Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum Staton, Gareth James Sullivan, Leigh Emma Blowey, Roger W Carter, Stuart D Evans, Nicholas James Vet Rec Short Communication BACKGROUND: Non-healing bovine foot lesions, including non-healing white line disease, non-healing sole ulcer and toe necrosis, are an increasingly important cause of chronic lameness that are poorly responsive to treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated a high-level association between these non-healing lesions and the Treponema phylogroups implicated in bovine digital dermatitis (BDD). However, a polymicrobial aetiology involving other gram-stain-negative anaerobes is suspected. METHODS: A PCR-based bacteriological survey of uncomplicated BDD lesions (n=10) and non-healing bovine foot lesions (n=10) targeting Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis, Dichelobacter nodosus and Treponema pallidum/T. paraluiscuniculi was performed. RESULTS: P. endodontalis DNA was detected in 80.0% of the non-healing lesion biopsies (p=<0.001) but was entirely absent from uncomplicated BDD lesion biopsies. When compared to the BDD lesions, F. necrophorum was detected at a higher frequency in the non-healing lesions (33.3% vs 70.0%, respectively), whereas D. nodosus was detected at a lower frequency (55.5% vs 20.0%, respectively). Conversely, T. pallidum/T. paraluiscuniculi DNA was not detected in either lesion type. CONCLUSION: The data from this pilot study suggest that P. endodontalis and F. necrophorum should be further investigated as potential aetiological agents of non-healing bovine foot lesions. A failure to detect syphilis treponemes in either lesion type is reassuring given the potential public health implications such an infection would present. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-18 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7279135/ /pubmed/32066637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105628 Text en © British Veterinary Association 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Staton, Gareth James
Sullivan, Leigh Emma
Blowey, Roger W
Carter, Stuart D
Evans, Nicholas James
Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum
title Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum
title_full Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum
title_fullStr Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum
title_full_unstemmed Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum
title_short Surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of Fusobacterium necrophorum, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema pallidum
title_sort surveying bovine digital dermatitis and non-healing bovine foot lesions for the presence of fusobacterium necrophorum, porphyromonas endodontalis and treponema pallidum
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105628
work_keys_str_mv AT statongarethjames surveyingbovinedigitaldermatitisandnonhealingbovinefootlesionsforthepresenceoffusobacteriumnecrophorumporphyromonasendodontalisandtreponemapallidum
AT sullivanleighemma surveyingbovinedigitaldermatitisandnonhealingbovinefootlesionsforthepresenceoffusobacteriumnecrophorumporphyromonasendodontalisandtreponemapallidum
AT bloweyrogerw surveyingbovinedigitaldermatitisandnonhealingbovinefootlesionsforthepresenceoffusobacteriumnecrophorumporphyromonasendodontalisandtreponemapallidum
AT carterstuartd surveyingbovinedigitaldermatitisandnonhealingbovinefootlesionsforthepresenceoffusobacteriumnecrophorumporphyromonasendodontalisandtreponemapallidum
AT evansnicholasjames surveyingbovinedigitaldermatitisandnonhealingbovinefootlesionsforthepresenceoffusobacteriumnecrophorumporphyromonasendodontalisandtreponemapallidum