Cargando…

ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype

BACKGROUND: Deletions removing 100s–1000s kb of DNA, and variable numbers of poorly characterised genes, are often found in patients with a wide range of developmental abnormalities. In such cases, understanding the contribution of the deletion to an individual’s clinical phenotype is challenging. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babbs, Christian, Brown, Jill, Horsley, Sharon W, Slater, Joanne, Maifoshie, Evie, Kumar, Shiwangini, Ooijevaar, Paul, Kriek, Marjolein, Dixon-McIver, Amanda, Harteveld, Cornelis L, Traeger-Synodinos, Jan, Wilkie, Andrew O M, Higgs, Douglas R, Buckle, Veronica J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106528
_version_ 1783543502199586816
author Babbs, Christian
Brown, Jill
Horsley, Sharon W
Slater, Joanne
Maifoshie, Evie
Kumar, Shiwangini
Ooijevaar, Paul
Kriek, Marjolein
Dixon-McIver, Amanda
Harteveld, Cornelis L
Traeger-Synodinos, Jan
Wilkie, Andrew O M
Higgs, Douglas R
Buckle, Veronica J
author_facet Babbs, Christian
Brown, Jill
Horsley, Sharon W
Slater, Joanne
Maifoshie, Evie
Kumar, Shiwangini
Ooijevaar, Paul
Kriek, Marjolein
Dixon-McIver, Amanda
Harteveld, Cornelis L
Traeger-Synodinos, Jan
Wilkie, Andrew O M
Higgs, Douglas R
Buckle, Veronica J
author_sort Babbs, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deletions removing 100s–1000s kb of DNA, and variable numbers of poorly characterised genes, are often found in patients with a wide range of developmental abnormalities. In such cases, understanding the contribution of the deletion to an individual’s clinical phenotype is challenging. METHODS: Here, as an example of this common phenomenon, we analysed 41 patients with simple deletions of ~177 to ~2000 kb affecting one allele of the well-characterised, gene dense, distal region of chromosome 16 (16p13.3), referred to as ATR-16 syndrome. We characterised deletion extents and screened for genetic background effects, telomere position effect and compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes. RESULTS: We find the risk of developmental and neurological abnormalities arises from much smaller distal chromosome 16 deletions (~400 kb) than previously reported. Beyond this, the severity of ATR-16 syndrome increases with deletion size, but there is no evidence that critical regions determine the developmental abnormalities associated with this disorder. Surprisingly, we find no evidence of telomere position effect or compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes; however, genetic background effects substantially modify phenotypic abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Using ATR-16 as a general model of disorders caused by CNVs, we show the degree to which individuals with contiguous gene syndromes are affected is not simply related to the number of genes deleted but depends on their genetic background. We also show there is no critical region defining the degree of phenotypic abnormalities in ATR-16 syndrome and this has important implications for genetic counselling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7279195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72791952020-06-15 ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype Babbs, Christian Brown, Jill Horsley, Sharon W Slater, Joanne Maifoshie, Evie Kumar, Shiwangini Ooijevaar, Paul Kriek, Marjolein Dixon-McIver, Amanda Harteveld, Cornelis L Traeger-Synodinos, Jan Wilkie, Andrew O M Higgs, Douglas R Buckle, Veronica J J Med Genet Genotype-Phenotype Correlations BACKGROUND: Deletions removing 100s–1000s kb of DNA, and variable numbers of poorly characterised genes, are often found in patients with a wide range of developmental abnormalities. In such cases, understanding the contribution of the deletion to an individual’s clinical phenotype is challenging. METHODS: Here, as an example of this common phenomenon, we analysed 41 patients with simple deletions of ~177 to ~2000 kb affecting one allele of the well-characterised, gene dense, distal region of chromosome 16 (16p13.3), referred to as ATR-16 syndrome. We characterised deletion extents and screened for genetic background effects, telomere position effect and compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes. RESULTS: We find the risk of developmental and neurological abnormalities arises from much smaller distal chromosome 16 deletions (~400 kb) than previously reported. Beyond this, the severity of ATR-16 syndrome increases with deletion size, but there is no evidence that critical regions determine the developmental abnormalities associated with this disorder. Surprisingly, we find no evidence of telomere position effect or compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes; however, genetic background effects substantially modify phenotypic abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Using ATR-16 as a general model of disorders caused by CNVs, we show the degree to which individuals with contiguous gene syndromes are affected is not simply related to the number of genes deleted but depends on their genetic background. We also show there is no critical region defining the degree of phenotypic abnormalities in ATR-16 syndrome and this has important implications for genetic counselling. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7279195/ /pubmed/32005695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106528 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
Babbs, Christian
Brown, Jill
Horsley, Sharon W
Slater, Joanne
Maifoshie, Evie
Kumar, Shiwangini
Ooijevaar, Paul
Kriek, Marjolein
Dixon-McIver, Amanda
Harteveld, Cornelis L
Traeger-Synodinos, Jan
Wilkie, Andrew O M
Higgs, Douglas R
Buckle, Veronica J
ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype
title ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype
title_full ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype
title_fullStr ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype
title_full_unstemmed ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype
title_short ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype
title_sort atr-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype
topic Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106528
work_keys_str_mv AT babbschristian atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT brownjill atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT horsleysharonw atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT slaterjoanne atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT maifoshieevie atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT kumarshiwangini atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT ooijevaarpaul atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT kriekmarjolein atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT dixonmciveramanda atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT harteveldcornelisl atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT traegersynodinosjan atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT wilkieandrewom atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT higgsdouglasr atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype
AT buckleveronicaj atr16syndromemechanismslinkingmonosomytophenotype