Cargando…
Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey
OBJECTIVE: General practitioners have an important role in reducing low-value care as gatekeepers of the health system. The aim of this study was to assess the experiences of Dutch general practitioners regarding low-value care and to identify their needs to decrease low-value primary care. DESIGN:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037019 |
_version_ | 1783543606449012736 |
---|---|
author | Kool, Rudolf Bertijn Verkerk, Eva W Winnemuller, Lieke JA Wiersma, Tjerk Westert, Gert P Burgers, Jaco S van Dulmen, Simone A |
author_facet | Kool, Rudolf Bertijn Verkerk, Eva W Winnemuller, Lieke JA Wiersma, Tjerk Westert, Gert P Burgers, Jaco S van Dulmen, Simone A |
author_sort | Kool, Rudolf Bertijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: General practitioners have an important role in reducing low-value care as gatekeepers of the health system. The aim of this study was to assess the experiences of Dutch general practitioners regarding low-value care and to identify their needs to decrease low-value primary care. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: We sent a survey to 500 general practitioners. SETTING: Primary care in the Netherlands. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The survey contained questions about the provision of low-value care and on clinical cases about lumbosacral spine X-rays in patients with low back pain and vitamin B(12) laboratory tests without an evidence-based indication. We also asked general practitioners what they needed to reduce low-value care. RESULTS: A total of 182 general practitioners (37%) responded. 67% indicated that low-value care practices are regularly provided in general practice. 57% of the general practitioners have seen negative consequences of low-value care, in particular side effects of medication. The most provided low-value care practices are medication prescriptions such as antibiotics and laboratory tests such as vitamin B(12) tests. The most reported drivers are patient-related. General practitioners want to maintain a good relationship with their patients by offering their patients an intervention instead of watchful waiting. Lack of time also plays a major role. In order to reduce low-value care, general practitioners suggested that educating patients on the value of tests and treatments might help. Supporting general practitioners and other healthcare professionals with clear guidelines as well as having more time for consultation were also mentioned by general practitioners. CONCLUSION: General practitioners are aware of providing unnecessary care despite their role as gatekeepers and have reasons for this. They need support in order to change their practice. This support might consist of better education of healthcare professionals and providing more time for consultation. Local and national media, such as websites and television, could be used to educate patients while guidelines could support professionals in reducing low-value care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7279641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72796412020-06-15 Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey Kool, Rudolf Bertijn Verkerk, Eva W Winnemuller, Lieke JA Wiersma, Tjerk Westert, Gert P Burgers, Jaco S van Dulmen, Simone A BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: General practitioners have an important role in reducing low-value care as gatekeepers of the health system. The aim of this study was to assess the experiences of Dutch general practitioners regarding low-value care and to identify their needs to decrease low-value primary care. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: We sent a survey to 500 general practitioners. SETTING: Primary care in the Netherlands. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The survey contained questions about the provision of low-value care and on clinical cases about lumbosacral spine X-rays in patients with low back pain and vitamin B(12) laboratory tests without an evidence-based indication. We also asked general practitioners what they needed to reduce low-value care. RESULTS: A total of 182 general practitioners (37%) responded. 67% indicated that low-value care practices are regularly provided in general practice. 57% of the general practitioners have seen negative consequences of low-value care, in particular side effects of medication. The most provided low-value care practices are medication prescriptions such as antibiotics and laboratory tests such as vitamin B(12) tests. The most reported drivers are patient-related. General practitioners want to maintain a good relationship with their patients by offering their patients an intervention instead of watchful waiting. Lack of time also plays a major role. In order to reduce low-value care, general practitioners suggested that educating patients on the value of tests and treatments might help. Supporting general practitioners and other healthcare professionals with clear guidelines as well as having more time for consultation were also mentioned by general practitioners. CONCLUSION: General practitioners are aware of providing unnecessary care despite their role as gatekeepers and have reasons for this. They need support in order to change their practice. This support might consist of better education of healthcare professionals and providing more time for consultation. Local and national media, such as websites and television, could be used to educate patients while guidelines could support professionals in reducing low-value care. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7279641/ /pubmed/32499273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037019 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Kool, Rudolf Bertijn Verkerk, Eva W Winnemuller, Lieke JA Wiersma, Tjerk Westert, Gert P Burgers, Jaco S van Dulmen, Simone A Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey |
title | Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey |
title_full | Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey |
title_short | Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the gp’s perspective—a cross-sectional survey |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7279641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koolrudolfbertijn identifyinganddeimplementinglowvaluecareinprimarycarethegpsperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT verkerkevaw identifyinganddeimplementinglowvaluecareinprimarycarethegpsperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT winnemullerliekeja identifyinganddeimplementinglowvaluecareinprimarycarethegpsperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT wiersmatjerk identifyinganddeimplementinglowvaluecareinprimarycarethegpsperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT westertgertp identifyinganddeimplementinglowvaluecareinprimarycarethegpsperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT burgersjacos identifyinganddeimplementinglowvaluecareinprimarycarethegpsperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey AT vandulmensimonea identifyinganddeimplementinglowvaluecareinprimarycarethegpsperspectiveacrosssectionalsurvey |