Cargando…

DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer

Despite the advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), associated toxicity is a serious complication that renders monitoring of the patients’ response to NACT highly important. Thus, prediction of tumor response to treatment is imperative to avoid exposure of potential non-responders to deleteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigin, Vladimir O., Kalinkin, Alexey I., Kuznetsova, Ekaterina B., Simonova, Olga A., Chesnokova, Galina G., Litviakov, Nikolai V., Slonimskaya, Elena M., Tsyganov, Matvey M., Ibragimova, Marina K., Volodin, Ilya V., Vinogradov, Ilya I., Vinogradov, Maksim I., Vinogradov, Igor Y., Kutsev, Sergey I., Strelnikov, Vladimir V., Zaletaev, Dmitry V., Tanas, Alexander S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66197-1
_version_ 1783543758713782272
author Sigin, Vladimir O.
Kalinkin, Alexey I.
Kuznetsova, Ekaterina B.
Simonova, Olga A.
Chesnokova, Galina G.
Litviakov, Nikolai V.
Slonimskaya, Elena M.
Tsyganov, Matvey M.
Ibragimova, Marina K.
Volodin, Ilya V.
Vinogradov, Ilya I.
Vinogradov, Maksim I.
Vinogradov, Igor Y.
Kutsev, Sergey I.
Strelnikov, Vladimir V.
Zaletaev, Dmitry V.
Tanas, Alexander S.
author_facet Sigin, Vladimir O.
Kalinkin, Alexey I.
Kuznetsova, Ekaterina B.
Simonova, Olga A.
Chesnokova, Galina G.
Litviakov, Nikolai V.
Slonimskaya, Elena M.
Tsyganov, Matvey M.
Ibragimova, Marina K.
Volodin, Ilya V.
Vinogradov, Ilya I.
Vinogradov, Maksim I.
Vinogradov, Igor Y.
Kutsev, Sergey I.
Strelnikov, Vladimir V.
Zaletaev, Dmitry V.
Tanas, Alexander S.
author_sort Sigin, Vladimir O.
collection PubMed
description Despite the advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), associated toxicity is a serious complication that renders monitoring of the patients’ response to NACT highly important. Thus, prediction of tumor response to treatment is imperative to avoid exposure of potential non-responders to deleterious complications. We have performed genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation by XmaI-RRBS and selected CpG dinucleotides differential methylation of which discriminates luminal B breast cancer samples with different sensitivity to NACT. With this data, we have developed multiplex methylation sensitive restriction enzyme PCR (MSRE-PCR) protocol for determining the methylation status of 10 genes (SLC9A3, C1QL2, DPYS, IRF4, ADCY8, KCNQ2, TERT, SYNDIG1, SKOR2 and GRIK1) that distinguish BC samples with different NACT response. Analysis of these 10 markers by MSRE-PCR in biopsy samples allowed us to reveal three top informative combinations of markers, (1) IRF4 and C1QL2; (2) IRF4, C1QL2, and ADCY8; (3) IRF4, C1QL2, and DPYS, with the areas under ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.75, 0.78 and 0.74, respectively. A classifier based on IRF4 and C1QL2 better meets the diagnostic panel simplicity requirements, as it consists of only two markers. Diagnostic accuracy of the panel of these two markers is 0.75, with the sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 75%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7280523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72805232020-06-15 DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer Sigin, Vladimir O. Kalinkin, Alexey I. Kuznetsova, Ekaterina B. Simonova, Olga A. Chesnokova, Galina G. Litviakov, Nikolai V. Slonimskaya, Elena M. Tsyganov, Matvey M. Ibragimova, Marina K. Volodin, Ilya V. Vinogradov, Ilya I. Vinogradov, Maksim I. Vinogradov, Igor Y. Kutsev, Sergey I. Strelnikov, Vladimir V. Zaletaev, Dmitry V. Tanas, Alexander S. Sci Rep Article Despite the advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), associated toxicity is a serious complication that renders monitoring of the patients’ response to NACT highly important. Thus, prediction of tumor response to treatment is imperative to avoid exposure of potential non-responders to deleterious complications. We have performed genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation by XmaI-RRBS and selected CpG dinucleotides differential methylation of which discriminates luminal B breast cancer samples with different sensitivity to NACT. With this data, we have developed multiplex methylation sensitive restriction enzyme PCR (MSRE-PCR) protocol for determining the methylation status of 10 genes (SLC9A3, C1QL2, DPYS, IRF4, ADCY8, KCNQ2, TERT, SYNDIG1, SKOR2 and GRIK1) that distinguish BC samples with different NACT response. Analysis of these 10 markers by MSRE-PCR in biopsy samples allowed us to reveal three top informative combinations of markers, (1) IRF4 and C1QL2; (2) IRF4, C1QL2, and ADCY8; (3) IRF4, C1QL2, and DPYS, with the areas under ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.75, 0.78 and 0.74, respectively. A classifier based on IRF4 and C1QL2 better meets the diagnostic panel simplicity requirements, as it consists of only two markers. Diagnostic accuracy of the panel of these two markers is 0.75, with the sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 75%. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7280523/ /pubmed/32514046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66197-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sigin, Vladimir O.
Kalinkin, Alexey I.
Kuznetsova, Ekaterina B.
Simonova, Olga A.
Chesnokova, Galina G.
Litviakov, Nikolai V.
Slonimskaya, Elena M.
Tsyganov, Matvey M.
Ibragimova, Marina K.
Volodin, Ilya V.
Vinogradov, Ilya I.
Vinogradov, Maksim I.
Vinogradov, Igor Y.
Kutsev, Sergey I.
Strelnikov, Vladimir V.
Zaletaev, Dmitry V.
Tanas, Alexander S.
DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
title DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
title_full DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
title_fullStr DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
title_short DNA methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer
title_sort dna methylation markers panel can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal b breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32514046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66197-1
work_keys_str_mv AT siginvladimiro dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT kalinkinalexeyi dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT kuznetsovaekaterinab dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT simonovaolgaa dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT chesnokovagalinag dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT litviakovnikolaiv dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT slonimskayaelenam dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT tsyganovmatveym dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT ibragimovamarinak dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT volodinilyav dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT vinogradovilyai dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT vinogradovmaksimi dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT vinogradovigory dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT kutsevsergeyi dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT strelnikovvladimirv dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT zaletaevdmitryv dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer
AT tanasalexanders dnamethylationmarkerspanelcanimprovepredictionofresponsetoneoadjuvantchemotherapyinluminalbbreastcancer