Cargando…
Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research
The number of research involving human subjects on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is surging, bringing challenges to the ethical review committee (ERC) in terms of reviewing speed and special ethical considerations under the pandemic. However, the existing ethical review system and regulations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12388 |
_version_ | 1783543771780087808 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Xitao Wang, Yanqiao Gao, Tian He, Qing He, Yan Yue, Rensong You, Fengming Tang, Jianyuan |
author_facet | Ma, Xitao Wang, Yanqiao Gao, Tian He, Qing He, Yan Yue, Rensong You, Fengming Tang, Jianyuan |
author_sort | Ma, Xitao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The number of research involving human subjects on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is surging, bringing challenges to the ethical review committee (ERC) in terms of reviewing speed and special ethical considerations under the pandemic. However, the existing ethical review system and regulations have their limitations to meet the demand for a prompt and efficient epidemic control. Since the research under the public health emergency is different from that carried out in familiar situations to design and implementation, the strategy for a satisfactory ERC response should balance the duty of protecting individual participants as well as the special public needs derived from the disease control. It is suggested that the ethical review‐related regulations need to be updated, and a unified supervision system to the overall ERC is required. ERC collaboration, capacity‐improving and efficiency‐improving measures need to be taken. With respect to the reviewing guidelines, it is suggested that the international norms should be explained with more consideration of the local condition and the exceptional circumstances in this public health emergency. A joint effort needs to be taken for better research conduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7280675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72806752020-06-09 Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research Ma, Xitao Wang, Yanqiao Gao, Tian He, Qing He, Yan Yue, Rensong You, Fengming Tang, Jianyuan J Evid Based Med Commentary The number of research involving human subjects on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is surging, bringing challenges to the ethical review committee (ERC) in terms of reviewing speed and special ethical considerations under the pandemic. However, the existing ethical review system and regulations have their limitations to meet the demand for a prompt and efficient epidemic control. Since the research under the public health emergency is different from that carried out in familiar situations to design and implementation, the strategy for a satisfactory ERC response should balance the duty of protecting individual participants as well as the special public needs derived from the disease control. It is suggested that the ethical review‐related regulations need to be updated, and a unified supervision system to the overall ERC is required. ERC collaboration, capacity‐improving and efficiency‐improving measures need to be taken. With respect to the reviewing guidelines, it is suggested that the international norms should be explained with more consideration of the local condition and the exceptional circumstances in this public health emergency. A joint effort needs to be taken for better research conduction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-22 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7280675/ /pubmed/32445288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12388 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine published by Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Ma, Xitao Wang, Yanqiao Gao, Tian He, Qing He, Yan Yue, Rensong You, Fengming Tang, Jianyuan Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research |
title | Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research |
title_full | Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research |
title_fullStr | Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research |
title_short | Challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting COVID‐19 research |
title_sort | challenges and strategies to research ethics in conducting covid‐19 research |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maxitao challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research AT wangyanqiao challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research AT gaotian challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research AT heqing challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research AT heyan challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research AT yuerensong challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research AT youfengming challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research AT tangjianyuan challengesandstrategiestoresearchethicsinconductingcovid19research |