Cargando…
Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the main public health challenges currently facing the world. Because of its high transmissibility, COVID-19 has already caused extensive morbidity and mortality in many countries throughout the world. An accurate estimation o...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.076 |
_version_ | 1783543790122827776 |
---|---|
author | Alimohamadi, Yousef Taghdir, Maryam Sepandi, Mojtaba |
author_facet | Alimohamadi, Yousef Taghdir, Maryam Sepandi, Mojtaba |
author_sort | Alimohamadi, Yousef |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the main public health challenges currently facing the world. Because of its high transmissibility, COVID-19 has already caused extensive morbidity and mortality in many countries throughout the world. An accurate estimation of the basic reproduction number (R(0)) of COVID-19 would be beneficial for prevention programs. In light of discrepancies in original research on this issue, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 in the current outbreak. METHODS: International databases (including Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched to identify studies conducted regarding the R(0) of COVID-19. Articles were searched using the following keywords: “COVID-19” and “basic reproduction number” or “R(0).” The heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I(2) index, the Cochran Q test, and T(2). A random-effects model was used to estimate R(0) in this study. RESULTS: The mean reported R(0) in the identified articles was 3.38±1.40, with a range of 1.90 to 6.49. According to the results of the random-effects model, the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 was estimated as 3.32 (95% confidence interval, 2.81 to 3.82). According to the results of the meta-regression analysis, the type of model used to estimate R(0) did not have a significant effect on heterogeneity among studies (p=0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the estimated R(0) for COVID-19, reducing the number of contacts within the population is a necessary step to control the epidemic. The estimated overall R(0) was higher than the World Health Organization estimate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7280807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society for Preventive Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72808072020-06-17 Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Alimohamadi, Yousef Taghdir, Maryam Sepandi, Mojtaba J Prev Med Public Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the main public health challenges currently facing the world. Because of its high transmissibility, COVID-19 has already caused extensive morbidity and mortality in many countries throughout the world. An accurate estimation of the basic reproduction number (R(0)) of COVID-19 would be beneficial for prevention programs. In light of discrepancies in original research on this issue, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 in the current outbreak. METHODS: International databases (including Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched to identify studies conducted regarding the R(0) of COVID-19. Articles were searched using the following keywords: “COVID-19” and “basic reproduction number” or “R(0).” The heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I(2) index, the Cochran Q test, and T(2). A random-effects model was used to estimate R(0) in this study. RESULTS: The mean reported R(0) in the identified articles was 3.38±1.40, with a range of 1.90 to 6.49. According to the results of the random-effects model, the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 was estimated as 3.32 (95% confidence interval, 2.81 to 3.82). According to the results of the meta-regression analysis, the type of model used to estimate R(0) did not have a significant effect on heterogeneity among studies (p=0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the estimated R(0) for COVID-19, reducing the number of contacts within the population is a necessary step to control the epidemic. The estimated overall R(0) was higher than the World Health Organization estimate. Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2020-05 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7280807/ /pubmed/32498136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.076 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Alimohamadi, Yousef Taghdir, Maryam Sepandi, Mojtaba Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | estimate of the basic reproduction number for covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alimohamadiyousef estimateofthebasicreproductionnumberforcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taghdirmaryam estimateofthebasicreproductionnumberforcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sepandimojtaba estimateofthebasicreproductionnumberforcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |