Cargando…

Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the main public health challenges currently facing the world. Because of its high transmissibility, COVID-19 has already caused extensive morbidity and mortality in many countries throughout the world. An accurate estimation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alimohamadi, Yousef, Taghdir, Maryam, Sepandi, Mojtaba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.076
_version_ 1783543790122827776
author Alimohamadi, Yousef
Taghdir, Maryam
Sepandi, Mojtaba
author_facet Alimohamadi, Yousef
Taghdir, Maryam
Sepandi, Mojtaba
author_sort Alimohamadi, Yousef
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the main public health challenges currently facing the world. Because of its high transmissibility, COVID-19 has already caused extensive morbidity and mortality in many countries throughout the world. An accurate estimation of the basic reproduction number (R(0)) of COVID-19 would be beneficial for prevention programs. In light of discrepancies in original research on this issue, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 in the current outbreak. METHODS: International databases (including Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched to identify studies conducted regarding the R(0) of COVID-19. Articles were searched using the following keywords: “COVID-19” and “basic reproduction number” or “R(0).” The heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I(2) index, the Cochran Q test, and T(2). A random-effects model was used to estimate R(0) in this study. RESULTS: The mean reported R(0) in the identified articles was 3.38±1.40, with a range of 1.90 to 6.49. According to the results of the random-effects model, the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 was estimated as 3.32 (95% confidence interval, 2.81 to 3.82). According to the results of the meta-regression analysis, the type of model used to estimate R(0) did not have a significant effect on heterogeneity among studies (p=0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the estimated R(0) for COVID-19, reducing the number of contacts within the population is a necessary step to control the epidemic. The estimated overall R(0) was higher than the World Health Organization estimate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7280807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society for Preventive Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72808072020-06-17 Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Alimohamadi, Yousef Taghdir, Maryam Sepandi, Mojtaba J Prev Med Public Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the main public health challenges currently facing the world. Because of its high transmissibility, COVID-19 has already caused extensive morbidity and mortality in many countries throughout the world. An accurate estimation of the basic reproduction number (R(0)) of COVID-19 would be beneficial for prevention programs. In light of discrepancies in original research on this issue, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 in the current outbreak. METHODS: International databases (including Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched to identify studies conducted regarding the R(0) of COVID-19. Articles were searched using the following keywords: “COVID-19” and “basic reproduction number” or “R(0).” The heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I(2) index, the Cochran Q test, and T(2). A random-effects model was used to estimate R(0) in this study. RESULTS: The mean reported R(0) in the identified articles was 3.38±1.40, with a range of 1.90 to 6.49. According to the results of the random-effects model, the pooled R(0) for COVID-19 was estimated as 3.32 (95% confidence interval, 2.81 to 3.82). According to the results of the meta-regression analysis, the type of model used to estimate R(0) did not have a significant effect on heterogeneity among studies (p=0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the estimated R(0) for COVID-19, reducing the number of contacts within the population is a necessary step to control the epidemic. The estimated overall R(0) was higher than the World Health Organization estimate. Korean Society for Preventive Medicine 2020-05 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7280807/ /pubmed/32498136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.076 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Alimohamadi, Yousef
Taghdir, Maryam
Sepandi, Mojtaba
Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Estimate of the Basic Reproduction Number for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort estimate of the basic reproduction number for covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.076
work_keys_str_mv AT alimohamadiyousef estimateofthebasicreproductionnumberforcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taghdirmaryam estimateofthebasicreproductionnumberforcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sepandimojtaba estimateofthebasicreproductionnumberforcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis