Cargando…

Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: We compared clinical and radiographical outcomes after lumbar decompression revision surgery for restenosis by lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Indirect lumbar decompre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakashima, Hiroaki, Kanemura, Tokumi, Satake, Kotaro, Ito, Kenyu, Ishikawa, Yoshimoto, Ouchida, Jun, Segi, Naoki, Yamaguchi, Hidetoshi, Imagama, Shiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31906613
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0194
_version_ 1783543809272971264
author Nakashima, Hiroaki
Kanemura, Tokumi
Satake, Kotaro
Ito, Kenyu
Ishikawa, Yoshimoto
Ouchida, Jun
Segi, Naoki
Yamaguchi, Hidetoshi
Imagama, Shiro
author_facet Nakashima, Hiroaki
Kanemura, Tokumi
Satake, Kotaro
Ito, Kenyu
Ishikawa, Yoshimoto
Ouchida, Jun
Segi, Naoki
Yamaguchi, Hidetoshi
Imagama, Shiro
author_sort Nakashima, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: We compared clinical and radiographical outcomes after lumbar decompression revision surgery for restenosis by lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Indirect lumbar decompression with LLIF was used to treat degenerative lumbar diseases requiring neural decompression. However, only a few studies have focused on the effectiveness of this technique for restenosis after lumbar decompression. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 52 cases involving lumbar interbody fusions for restenosis with spondylolisthesis after lumbar decompressions; these cases consisted of 15 patients who underwent indirect decompression with LLIF and posterior fixation and 37 patients who underwent the same procedure with PLIF. We compared Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and perioperative complications between groups. The cross-sectional areas of the thecal sac on magnetic resonance imaging were measured before, immediately after, and 2 years after surgery. We conducted statistical analyses using unpaired t -test and Fisher’s exact tests, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the LLIF group than in the PLIF group (115.3±33.6 min vs. 186.2±34.2 min, respectively; p<0.001). In addition, the intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LLIF group than in the PLIF group (58.2±32.7 mL vs. 303.2±140.1 mL, respectively; p<0.001). We found two cases of transient lateral thigh weakness (13.3%) in the LLIF group and five cases of incidental durotomy, one case of deep infection, and one case of neurological deterioration in the PLIF group—resulting in a higher complication incidence (18.9%), although it did not reach (p=0.63). The JOA scores improved significantly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect decompression using LLIF provided acceptable clinical and radiographical outcomes in patients with restenosis with spondylolisthesis after lumbar decompression; no revision-surgery-specific complications were found. Our results suggest that LLIF is a safe and minimally invasive procedure for revision surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7280913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72809132020-06-17 Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery Nakashima, Hiroaki Kanemura, Tokumi Satake, Kotaro Ito, Kenyu Ishikawa, Yoshimoto Ouchida, Jun Segi, Naoki Yamaguchi, Hidetoshi Imagama, Shiro Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: We compared clinical and radiographical outcomes after lumbar decompression revision surgery for restenosis by lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Indirect lumbar decompression with LLIF was used to treat degenerative lumbar diseases requiring neural decompression. However, only a few studies have focused on the effectiveness of this technique for restenosis after lumbar decompression. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 52 cases involving lumbar interbody fusions for restenosis with spondylolisthesis after lumbar decompressions; these cases consisted of 15 patients who underwent indirect decompression with LLIF and posterior fixation and 37 patients who underwent the same procedure with PLIF. We compared Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and perioperative complications between groups. The cross-sectional areas of the thecal sac on magnetic resonance imaging were measured before, immediately after, and 2 years after surgery. We conducted statistical analyses using unpaired t -test and Fisher’s exact tests, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the LLIF group than in the PLIF group (115.3±33.6 min vs. 186.2±34.2 min, respectively; p<0.001). In addition, the intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LLIF group than in the PLIF group (58.2±32.7 mL vs. 303.2±140.1 mL, respectively; p<0.001). We found two cases of transient lateral thigh weakness (13.3%) in the LLIF group and five cases of incidental durotomy, one case of deep infection, and one case of neurological deterioration in the PLIF group—resulting in a higher complication incidence (18.9%), although it did not reach (p=0.63). The JOA scores improved significantly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect decompression using LLIF provided acceptable clinical and radiographical outcomes in patients with restenosis with spondylolisthesis after lumbar decompression; no revision-surgery-specific complications were found. Our results suggest that LLIF is a safe and minimally invasive procedure for revision surgery. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2020-06 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7280913/ /pubmed/31906613 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0194 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Nakashima, Hiroaki
Kanemura, Tokumi
Satake, Kotaro
Ito, Kenyu
Ishikawa, Yoshimoto
Ouchida, Jun
Segi, Naoki
Yamaguchi, Hidetoshi
Imagama, Shiro
Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery
title Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery
title_full Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery
title_fullStr Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery
title_short Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery
title_sort indirect decompression using lateral lumbar interbody fusion for restenosis after an initial decompression surgery
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7280913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31906613
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0194
work_keys_str_mv AT nakashimahiroaki indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT kanemuratokumi indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT satakekotaro indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT itokenyu indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT ishikawayoshimoto indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT ouchidajun indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT seginaoki indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT yamaguchihidetoshi indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery
AT imagamashiro indirectdecompressionusinglaterallumbarinterbodyfusionforrestenosisafteraninitialdecompressionsurgery