Cargando…

Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention

Unselected population-based personalised ovarian cancer (OC) risk assessment combining genetic/epidemiology/hormonal data has not previously been undertaken. We aimed to perform a feasibility study of OC risk stratification of general population women using a personalised OC risk tool followed by ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaba, Faiza, Blyuss, Oleg, Liu, Xinting, Goyal, Shivam, Lahoti, Nishant, Chandrasekaran, Dhivya, Kurzer, Margarida, Kalsi, Jatinderpal, Sanderson, Saskia, Lanceley, Anne, Ahmed, Munaza, Side, Lucy, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Wallis, Yvonne, Wallace, Andrew, Waller, Jo, Luccarini, Craig, Yang, Xin, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison, Lee, Andrew, Antoniou, Antonis C., Legood, Rosa, Menon, Usha, Jacobs, Ian, Manchanda, Ranjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429029
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051241
_version_ 1783543972619091968
author Gaba, Faiza
Blyuss, Oleg
Liu, Xinting
Goyal, Shivam
Lahoti, Nishant
Chandrasekaran, Dhivya
Kurzer, Margarida
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Sanderson, Saskia
Lanceley, Anne
Ahmed, Munaza
Side, Lucy
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Wallis, Yvonne
Wallace, Andrew
Waller, Jo
Luccarini, Craig
Yang, Xin
Dennis, Joe
Dunning, Alison
Lee, Andrew
Antoniou, Antonis C.
Legood, Rosa
Menon, Usha
Jacobs, Ian
Manchanda, Ranjit
author_facet Gaba, Faiza
Blyuss, Oleg
Liu, Xinting
Goyal, Shivam
Lahoti, Nishant
Chandrasekaran, Dhivya
Kurzer, Margarida
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Sanderson, Saskia
Lanceley, Anne
Ahmed, Munaza
Side, Lucy
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Wallis, Yvonne
Wallace, Andrew
Waller, Jo
Luccarini, Craig
Yang, Xin
Dennis, Joe
Dunning, Alison
Lee, Andrew
Antoniou, Antonis C.
Legood, Rosa
Menon, Usha
Jacobs, Ian
Manchanda, Ranjit
author_sort Gaba, Faiza
collection PubMed
description Unselected population-based personalised ovarian cancer (OC) risk assessment combining genetic/epidemiology/hormonal data has not previously been undertaken. We aimed to perform a feasibility study of OC risk stratification of general population women using a personalised OC risk tool followed by risk management. Volunteers were recruited through London primary care networks. Inclusion criteria: women ≥18 years. Exclusion criteria: prior ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer, previous genetic testing for OC genes. Participants accessed an online/web-based decision aid along with optional telephone helpline use. Consenting individuals completed risk assessment and underwent genetic testing (BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1, OC susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms). A validated OC risk prediction algorithm provided a personalised OC risk estimate using genetic/lifestyle/hormonal OC risk factors. Population genetic testing (PGT)/OC risk stratification uptake/acceptability, satisfaction, decision aid/telephone helpline use, psychological health and quality of life were assessed using validated/customised questionnaires over six months. Linear-mixed models/contrast tests analysed impact on study outcomes. Main outcomes: feasibility/acceptability, uptake, decision aid/telephone helpline use, satisfaction/regret, and impact on psychological health/quality of life. In total, 123 volunteers (mean age = 48.5 (SD = 15.4) years) used the decision aid, 105 (85%) consented. None fulfilled NHS genetic testing clinical criteria. OC risk stratification revealed 1/103 at ≥10% (high), 0/103 at ≥5%–<10% (intermediate), and 100/103 at <5% (low) lifetime OC risk. Decision aid satisfaction was 92.2%. The telephone helpline use rate was 13% and the questionnaire response rate at six months was 75%. Contrast tests indicated that overall depression (p = 0.30), anxiety (p = 0.10), quality-of-life (p = 0.99), and distress (p = 0.25) levels did not jointly change, while OC worry (p = 0.021) and general cancer risk perception (p = 0.015) decreased over six months. In total, 85.5–98.7% were satisfied with their decision. Findings suggest population-based personalised OC risk stratification is feasible and acceptable, has high satisfaction, reduces cancer worry/risk perception, and does not negatively impact psychological health/quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7281662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72816622020-06-17 Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention Gaba, Faiza Blyuss, Oleg Liu, Xinting Goyal, Shivam Lahoti, Nishant Chandrasekaran, Dhivya Kurzer, Margarida Kalsi, Jatinderpal Sanderson, Saskia Lanceley, Anne Ahmed, Munaza Side, Lucy Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra Wallis, Yvonne Wallace, Andrew Waller, Jo Luccarini, Craig Yang, Xin Dennis, Joe Dunning, Alison Lee, Andrew Antoniou, Antonis C. Legood, Rosa Menon, Usha Jacobs, Ian Manchanda, Ranjit Cancers (Basel) Article Unselected population-based personalised ovarian cancer (OC) risk assessment combining genetic/epidemiology/hormonal data has not previously been undertaken. We aimed to perform a feasibility study of OC risk stratification of general population women using a personalised OC risk tool followed by risk management. Volunteers were recruited through London primary care networks. Inclusion criteria: women ≥18 years. Exclusion criteria: prior ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer, previous genetic testing for OC genes. Participants accessed an online/web-based decision aid along with optional telephone helpline use. Consenting individuals completed risk assessment and underwent genetic testing (BRCA1/BRCA2/RAD51C/RAD51D/BRIP1, OC susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms). A validated OC risk prediction algorithm provided a personalised OC risk estimate using genetic/lifestyle/hormonal OC risk factors. Population genetic testing (PGT)/OC risk stratification uptake/acceptability, satisfaction, decision aid/telephone helpline use, psychological health and quality of life were assessed using validated/customised questionnaires over six months. Linear-mixed models/contrast tests analysed impact on study outcomes. Main outcomes: feasibility/acceptability, uptake, decision aid/telephone helpline use, satisfaction/regret, and impact on psychological health/quality of life. In total, 123 volunteers (mean age = 48.5 (SD = 15.4) years) used the decision aid, 105 (85%) consented. None fulfilled NHS genetic testing clinical criteria. OC risk stratification revealed 1/103 at ≥10% (high), 0/103 at ≥5%–<10% (intermediate), and 100/103 at <5% (low) lifetime OC risk. Decision aid satisfaction was 92.2%. The telephone helpline use rate was 13% and the questionnaire response rate at six months was 75%. Contrast tests indicated that overall depression (p = 0.30), anxiety (p = 0.10), quality-of-life (p = 0.99), and distress (p = 0.25) levels did not jointly change, while OC worry (p = 0.021) and general cancer risk perception (p = 0.015) decreased over six months. In total, 85.5–98.7% were satisfied with their decision. Findings suggest population-based personalised OC risk stratification is feasible and acceptable, has high satisfaction, reduces cancer worry/risk perception, and does not negatively impact psychological health/quality of life. MDPI 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7281662/ /pubmed/32429029 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051241 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gaba, Faiza
Blyuss, Oleg
Liu, Xinting
Goyal, Shivam
Lahoti, Nishant
Chandrasekaran, Dhivya
Kurzer, Margarida
Kalsi, Jatinderpal
Sanderson, Saskia
Lanceley, Anne
Ahmed, Munaza
Side, Lucy
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
Wallis, Yvonne
Wallace, Andrew
Waller, Jo
Luccarini, Craig
Yang, Xin
Dennis, Joe
Dunning, Alison
Lee, Andrew
Antoniou, Antonis C.
Legood, Rosa
Menon, Usha
Jacobs, Ian
Manchanda, Ranjit
Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention
title Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention
title_full Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention
title_fullStr Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention
title_full_unstemmed Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention
title_short Population Study of Ovarian Cancer Risk Prediction for Targeted Screening and Prevention
title_sort population study of ovarian cancer risk prediction for targeted screening and prevention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429029
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051241
work_keys_str_mv AT gabafaiza populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT blyussoleg populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT liuxinting populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT goyalshivam populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT lahotinishant populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT chandrasekarandhivya populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT kurzermargarida populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT kalsijatinderpal populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT sandersonsaskia populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT lanceleyanne populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT ahmedmunaza populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT sidelucy populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT gentrymaharajaleksandra populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT wallisyvonne populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT wallaceandrew populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT wallerjo populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT luccarinicraig populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT yangxin populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT dennisjoe populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT dunningalison populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT leeandrew populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT antoniouantonisc populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT legoodrosa populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT menonusha populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT jacobsian populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention
AT manchandaranjit populationstudyofovariancancerriskpredictionfortargetedscreeningandprevention