Cargando…

Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry

The anodizing industry generates several alkaline and acidic wastewater streams often with high concentrations of heavy metals. In this study, nanofiltration (NF) was used to treat wastewater from individual baths, i.e., wastewater from color rinse, alkaline pickling rinse, acidic pickling rinse and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Aamer, Nymann, Maria C., Christensen, Morten L., Quist-Jensen, Cejna A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050085
_version_ 1783543973336317952
author Ali, Aamer
Nymann, Maria C.
Christensen, Morten L.
Quist-Jensen, Cejna A.
author_facet Ali, Aamer
Nymann, Maria C.
Christensen, Morten L.
Quist-Jensen, Cejna A.
author_sort Ali, Aamer
collection PubMed
description The anodizing industry generates several alkaline and acidic wastewater streams often with high concentrations of heavy metals. In this study, nanofiltration (NF) was used to treat wastewater from individual baths, i.e., wastewater from color rinse, alkaline pickling rinse, acidic pickling rinse and anodizing rinse, as well as a mixture of all the wastewater streams. The experiments were carried out by using a commercial membrane (NF99HF) exhibiting pure water permeability of 10 L/(m(2)·h·bar). For all wastewater streams except one, pH was adjusted to bring it within the recommended pH limits of the membrane, whereby part of the heavy metals precipitated and was removed. The NF of the color rinse offered high-quality permeate (heavy metals below detection limit) and high permeability (9 L/(m(2)·h·bar)), whereas the nanofiltration of the alkaline pickling rinse exhibited no permeability. The NF of the acidic pickling rinse showed a permeability of 3.1–4.1 L/(m(2)·h·bar), but low ion rejection (7–13%). NF of the neutralized mixed wastewater, after the removal of precipitate, produced high-quality permeate with a stable permeability of 1 L/(m(2)·h·bar). Treatment of the mixed wastewater is therefore the best option if the water has to be discharged. If the water has to be reused, the permeate conductivity in the color rinse and anodizing rinse baths have been reduced significantly, so the treatment of these streams may then be a better option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7281665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72816652020-06-17 Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry Ali, Aamer Nymann, Maria C. Christensen, Morten L. Quist-Jensen, Cejna A. Membranes (Basel) Article The anodizing industry generates several alkaline and acidic wastewater streams often with high concentrations of heavy metals. In this study, nanofiltration (NF) was used to treat wastewater from individual baths, i.e., wastewater from color rinse, alkaline pickling rinse, acidic pickling rinse and anodizing rinse, as well as a mixture of all the wastewater streams. The experiments were carried out by using a commercial membrane (NF99HF) exhibiting pure water permeability of 10 L/(m(2)·h·bar). For all wastewater streams except one, pH was adjusted to bring it within the recommended pH limits of the membrane, whereby part of the heavy metals precipitated and was removed. The NF of the color rinse offered high-quality permeate (heavy metals below detection limit) and high permeability (9 L/(m(2)·h·bar)), whereas the nanofiltration of the alkaline pickling rinse exhibited no permeability. The NF of the acidic pickling rinse showed a permeability of 3.1–4.1 L/(m(2)·h·bar), but low ion rejection (7–13%). NF of the neutralized mixed wastewater, after the removal of precipitate, produced high-quality permeate with a stable permeability of 1 L/(m(2)·h·bar). Treatment of the mixed wastewater is therefore the best option if the water has to be discharged. If the water has to be reused, the permeate conductivity in the color rinse and anodizing rinse baths have been reduced significantly, so the treatment of these streams may then be a better option. MDPI 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7281665/ /pubmed/32365735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050085 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ali, Aamer
Nymann, Maria C.
Christensen, Morten L.
Quist-Jensen, Cejna A.
Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry
title Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry
title_full Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry
title_fullStr Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry
title_full_unstemmed Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry
title_short Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry
title_sort industrial wastewater treatment by nanofiltration—a case study on the anodizing industry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32365735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050085
work_keys_str_mv AT aliaamer industrialwastewatertreatmentbynanofiltrationacasestudyontheanodizingindustry
AT nymannmariac industrialwastewatertreatmentbynanofiltrationacasestudyontheanodizingindustry
AT christensenmortenl industrialwastewatertreatmentbynanofiltrationacasestudyontheanodizingindustry
AT quistjensencejnaa industrialwastewatertreatmentbynanofiltrationacasestudyontheanodizingindustry