Cargando…
Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
Feed has been shown to be a vector for viral transmission. Four experiments were conducted to: 1) determine if medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) are effective mitigants when applied to feed both pre- and post-porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) inoculation measured by quantitative reverse transcrip...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32447386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa159 |
_version_ | 1783544015135703040 |
---|---|
author | Lerner, Annie B Cochrane, Roger A Gebhardt, Jordan T Dritz, Steve S Jones, Cassandra K DeRouchey, Joel M Tokach, Mike D Goodband, Robert D Bai, Jianfa Porter, Elizabeth Anderson, Joe Gauger, Phillip C Magstadt, Drew R Zhang, Jianqiang Bass, Benjamin Karnezos, Theodore de Rodas, Brenda Woodworth, Jason C |
author_facet | Lerner, Annie B Cochrane, Roger A Gebhardt, Jordan T Dritz, Steve S Jones, Cassandra K DeRouchey, Joel M Tokach, Mike D Goodband, Robert D Bai, Jianfa Porter, Elizabeth Anderson, Joe Gauger, Phillip C Magstadt, Drew R Zhang, Jianqiang Bass, Benjamin Karnezos, Theodore de Rodas, Brenda Woodworth, Jason C |
author_sort | Lerner, Annie B |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feed has been shown to be a vector for viral transmission. Four experiments were conducted to: 1) determine if medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) are effective mitigants when applied to feed both pre- and post-porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) inoculation measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), 2) evaluate varying levels and combinations of MCFA measured by qRT-PCR, and 3) evaluate selected treatments in bioassay to determine infectivity. In exp. 1, treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial with main effects of treatment (0.3% commercial formaldehyde [CF] product, Sal CURB [Kemin Industries, Inc.; Des Moines, IA], or 1% MCFA blend (Blend) of 1:1:1 C6:C8:C10 [PMI, Arden Hills, MN]) and timing of application (pre- or post-inoculation with PEDV) plus a positive control (PC; feed inoculated with PEDV and no treatment). All combinations of treatment and timing decreased detectable PEDV compared with the PC (P < 0.05). Pre-inoculation treatment elicited decreased magnitude of PEDV detection (cycle threshold value) compared with post-inoculation (P = 0.009). Magnitude of PEDV detection was decreased for CF compared with Blend (P < 0.0001). In exp. 2, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 5) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0, 6 to 8) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0, 9 to 11) 0.125% to 0.33% C10:0, and 12 to 15) 0.125% to 0.66% C5:0. Treating feed with 0.33% C8:0 resulted in decreased (P < 0.05) PEDV detection compared with all other treatments. Increasing concentration of each individual MCFA decreased PEDV detectability (P < 0.042). In exp. 3, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 7) 0.25% to 1% Blend, 8 to 10) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C8:0, 11 to 13) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C10:0, and 14 to 16) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0 + C10:0. Treating feed with CF, 0.5% Blend, 0.75% Blend, 1% Blend, all levels of C6:0+C8:0, 0.25% C6:0 + 0.25% C10:0, 0.33% C6:0 + 0.33% C10:0, 0.25% C8:0 + 0.25% C10:0, or 0.33% C8:0 + 0.33% C10:0 elicited decreased detection of PEDV compared with PC (P < 0.05). Increasing concentration of each MCFA combination decreased PEDV detectability (linear, P < 0.012). In exp. 4, feed was treated pre-inoculation with: 1) no treatment (PC), 2) 0.3% CF, 3) 0.5% Blend, or 4) 0.3% C8:0 and analyzed via qRT-PCR and bioassay. Adding 0.5% Blend or 0.3% C8:0 resulted in decreased PEDV compared with PC and only PC resulted in a positive bioassay. Therefore, MCFA can decrease detection of PEDV in feed. Further, inclusion of lower levels of MCFA than previously evaluated are effective against PEDV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7281870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72818702020-06-12 Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed Lerner, Annie B Cochrane, Roger A Gebhardt, Jordan T Dritz, Steve S Jones, Cassandra K DeRouchey, Joel M Tokach, Mike D Goodband, Robert D Bai, Jianfa Porter, Elizabeth Anderson, Joe Gauger, Phillip C Magstadt, Drew R Zhang, Jianqiang Bass, Benjamin Karnezos, Theodore de Rodas, Brenda Woodworth, Jason C J Anim Sci Animal Health and Well Being Feed has been shown to be a vector for viral transmission. Four experiments were conducted to: 1) determine if medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) are effective mitigants when applied to feed both pre- and post-porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) inoculation measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), 2) evaluate varying levels and combinations of MCFA measured by qRT-PCR, and 3) evaluate selected treatments in bioassay to determine infectivity. In exp. 1, treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial with main effects of treatment (0.3% commercial formaldehyde [CF] product, Sal CURB [Kemin Industries, Inc.; Des Moines, IA], or 1% MCFA blend (Blend) of 1:1:1 C6:C8:C10 [PMI, Arden Hills, MN]) and timing of application (pre- or post-inoculation with PEDV) plus a positive control (PC; feed inoculated with PEDV and no treatment). All combinations of treatment and timing decreased detectable PEDV compared with the PC (P < 0.05). Pre-inoculation treatment elicited decreased magnitude of PEDV detection (cycle threshold value) compared with post-inoculation (P = 0.009). Magnitude of PEDV detection was decreased for CF compared with Blend (P < 0.0001). In exp. 2, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 5) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0, 6 to 8) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0, 9 to 11) 0.125% to 0.33% C10:0, and 12 to 15) 0.125% to 0.66% C5:0. Treating feed with 0.33% C8:0 resulted in decreased (P < 0.05) PEDV detection compared with all other treatments. Increasing concentration of each individual MCFA decreased PEDV detectability (P < 0.042). In exp. 3, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 7) 0.25% to 1% Blend, 8 to 10) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C8:0, 11 to 13) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C10:0, and 14 to 16) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0 + C10:0. Treating feed with CF, 0.5% Blend, 0.75% Blend, 1% Blend, all levels of C6:0+C8:0, 0.25% C6:0 + 0.25% C10:0, 0.33% C6:0 + 0.33% C10:0, 0.25% C8:0 + 0.25% C10:0, or 0.33% C8:0 + 0.33% C10:0 elicited decreased detection of PEDV compared with PC (P < 0.05). Increasing concentration of each MCFA combination decreased PEDV detectability (linear, P < 0.012). In exp. 4, feed was treated pre-inoculation with: 1) no treatment (PC), 2) 0.3% CF, 3) 0.5% Blend, or 4) 0.3% C8:0 and analyzed via qRT-PCR and bioassay. Adding 0.5% Blend or 0.3% C8:0 resulted in decreased PEDV compared with PC and only PC resulted in a positive bioassay. Therefore, MCFA can decrease detection of PEDV in feed. Further, inclusion of lower levels of MCFA than previously evaluated are effective against PEDV. Oxford University Press 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7281870/ /pubmed/32447386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa159 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Animal Health and Well Being Lerner, Annie B Cochrane, Roger A Gebhardt, Jordan T Dritz, Steve S Jones, Cassandra K DeRouchey, Joel M Tokach, Mike D Goodband, Robert D Bai, Jianfa Porter, Elizabeth Anderson, Joe Gauger, Phillip C Magstadt, Drew R Zhang, Jianqiang Bass, Benjamin Karnezos, Theodore de Rodas, Brenda Woodworth, Jason C Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed |
title | Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed |
title_full | Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed |
title_fullStr | Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed |
title_short | Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed |
title_sort | effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed |
topic | Animal Health and Well Being |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32447386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lernerannieb effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT cochranerogera effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT gebhardtjordant effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT dritzsteves effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT jonescassandrak effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT deroucheyjoelm effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT tokachmiked effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT goodbandrobertd effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT baijianfa effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT porterelizabeth effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT andersonjoe effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT gaugerphillipc effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT magstadtdrewr effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT zhangjianqiang effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT bassbenjamin effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT karnezostheodore effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT derodasbrenda effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed AT woodworthjasonc effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed |