Cargando…

Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed

Feed has been shown to be a vector for viral transmission. Four experiments were conducted to: 1) determine if medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) are effective mitigants when applied to feed both pre- and post-porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) inoculation measured by quantitative reverse transcrip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lerner, Annie B, Cochrane, Roger A, Gebhardt, Jordan T, Dritz, Steve S, Jones, Cassandra K, DeRouchey, Joel M, Tokach, Mike D, Goodband, Robert D, Bai, Jianfa, Porter, Elizabeth, Anderson, Joe, Gauger, Phillip C, Magstadt, Drew R, Zhang, Jianqiang, Bass, Benjamin, Karnezos, Theodore, de Rodas, Brenda, Woodworth, Jason C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32447386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa159
_version_ 1783544015135703040
author Lerner, Annie B
Cochrane, Roger A
Gebhardt, Jordan T
Dritz, Steve S
Jones, Cassandra K
DeRouchey, Joel M
Tokach, Mike D
Goodband, Robert D
Bai, Jianfa
Porter, Elizabeth
Anderson, Joe
Gauger, Phillip C
Magstadt, Drew R
Zhang, Jianqiang
Bass, Benjamin
Karnezos, Theodore
de Rodas, Brenda
Woodworth, Jason C
author_facet Lerner, Annie B
Cochrane, Roger A
Gebhardt, Jordan T
Dritz, Steve S
Jones, Cassandra K
DeRouchey, Joel M
Tokach, Mike D
Goodband, Robert D
Bai, Jianfa
Porter, Elizabeth
Anderson, Joe
Gauger, Phillip C
Magstadt, Drew R
Zhang, Jianqiang
Bass, Benjamin
Karnezos, Theodore
de Rodas, Brenda
Woodworth, Jason C
author_sort Lerner, Annie B
collection PubMed
description Feed has been shown to be a vector for viral transmission. Four experiments were conducted to: 1) determine if medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) are effective mitigants when applied to feed both pre- and post-porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) inoculation measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), 2) evaluate varying levels and combinations of MCFA measured by qRT-PCR, and 3) evaluate selected treatments in bioassay to determine infectivity. In exp. 1, treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial with main effects of treatment (0.3% commercial formaldehyde [CF] product, Sal CURB [Kemin Industries, Inc.; Des Moines, IA], or 1% MCFA blend (Blend) of 1:1:1 C6:C8:C10 [PMI, Arden Hills, MN]) and timing of application (pre- or post-inoculation with PEDV) plus a positive control (PC; feed inoculated with PEDV and no treatment). All combinations of treatment and timing decreased detectable PEDV compared with the PC (P < 0.05). Pre-inoculation treatment elicited decreased magnitude of PEDV detection (cycle threshold value) compared with post-inoculation (P = 0.009). Magnitude of PEDV detection was decreased for CF compared with Blend (P < 0.0001). In exp. 2, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 5) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0, 6 to 8) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0, 9 to 11) 0.125% to 0.33% C10:0, and 12 to 15) 0.125% to 0.66% C5:0. Treating feed with 0.33% C8:0 resulted in decreased (P < 0.05) PEDV detection compared with all other treatments. Increasing concentration of each individual MCFA decreased PEDV detectability (P < 0.042). In exp. 3, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 7) 0.25% to 1% Blend, 8 to 10) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C8:0, 11 to 13) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C10:0, and 14 to 16) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0 + C10:0. Treating feed with CF, 0.5% Blend, 0.75% Blend, 1% Blend, all levels of C6:0+C8:0, 0.25% C6:0 + 0.25% C10:0, 0.33% C6:0 + 0.33% C10:0, 0.25% C8:0 + 0.25% C10:0, or 0.33% C8:0 + 0.33% C10:0 elicited decreased detection of PEDV compared with PC (P < 0.05). Increasing concentration of each MCFA combination decreased PEDV detectability (linear, P < 0.012). In exp. 4, feed was treated pre-inoculation with: 1) no treatment (PC), 2) 0.3% CF, 3) 0.5% Blend, or 4) 0.3% C8:0 and analyzed via qRT-PCR and bioassay. Adding 0.5% Blend or 0.3% C8:0 resulted in decreased PEDV compared with PC and only PC resulted in a positive bioassay. Therefore, MCFA can decrease detection of PEDV in feed. Further, inclusion of lower levels of MCFA than previously evaluated are effective against PEDV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7281870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72818702020-06-12 Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed Lerner, Annie B Cochrane, Roger A Gebhardt, Jordan T Dritz, Steve S Jones, Cassandra K DeRouchey, Joel M Tokach, Mike D Goodband, Robert D Bai, Jianfa Porter, Elizabeth Anderson, Joe Gauger, Phillip C Magstadt, Drew R Zhang, Jianqiang Bass, Benjamin Karnezos, Theodore de Rodas, Brenda Woodworth, Jason C J Anim Sci Animal Health and Well Being Feed has been shown to be a vector for viral transmission. Four experiments were conducted to: 1) determine if medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) are effective mitigants when applied to feed both pre- and post-porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) inoculation measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), 2) evaluate varying levels and combinations of MCFA measured by qRT-PCR, and 3) evaluate selected treatments in bioassay to determine infectivity. In exp. 1, treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial with main effects of treatment (0.3% commercial formaldehyde [CF] product, Sal CURB [Kemin Industries, Inc.; Des Moines, IA], or 1% MCFA blend (Blend) of 1:1:1 C6:C8:C10 [PMI, Arden Hills, MN]) and timing of application (pre- or post-inoculation with PEDV) plus a positive control (PC; feed inoculated with PEDV and no treatment). All combinations of treatment and timing decreased detectable PEDV compared with the PC (P < 0.05). Pre-inoculation treatment elicited decreased magnitude of PEDV detection (cycle threshold value) compared with post-inoculation (P = 0.009). Magnitude of PEDV detection was decreased for CF compared with Blend (P < 0.0001). In exp. 2, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 5) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0, 6 to 8) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0, 9 to 11) 0.125% to 0.33% C10:0, and 12 to 15) 0.125% to 0.66% C5:0. Treating feed with 0.33% C8:0 resulted in decreased (P < 0.05) PEDV detection compared with all other treatments. Increasing concentration of each individual MCFA decreased PEDV detectability (P < 0.042). In exp. 3, pre-inoculation treatments consisted of: 1) PC, 2) 0.3% CF, 3 to 7) 0.25% to 1% Blend, 8 to 10) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C8:0, 11 to 13) 0.125% to 0.33% C6:0 + C10:0, and 14 to 16) 0.125% to 0.33% C8:0 + C10:0. Treating feed with CF, 0.5% Blend, 0.75% Blend, 1% Blend, all levels of C6:0+C8:0, 0.25% C6:0 + 0.25% C10:0, 0.33% C6:0 + 0.33% C10:0, 0.25% C8:0 + 0.25% C10:0, or 0.33% C8:0 + 0.33% C10:0 elicited decreased detection of PEDV compared with PC (P < 0.05). Increasing concentration of each MCFA combination decreased PEDV detectability (linear, P < 0.012). In exp. 4, feed was treated pre-inoculation with: 1) no treatment (PC), 2) 0.3% CF, 3) 0.5% Blend, or 4) 0.3% C8:0 and analyzed via qRT-PCR and bioassay. Adding 0.5% Blend or 0.3% C8:0 resulted in decreased PEDV compared with PC and only PC resulted in a positive bioassay. Therefore, MCFA can decrease detection of PEDV in feed. Further, inclusion of lower levels of MCFA than previously evaluated are effective against PEDV. Oxford University Press 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7281870/ /pubmed/32447386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa159 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Animal Health and Well Being
Lerner, Annie B
Cochrane, Roger A
Gebhardt, Jordan T
Dritz, Steve S
Jones, Cassandra K
DeRouchey, Joel M
Tokach, Mike D
Goodband, Robert D
Bai, Jianfa
Porter, Elizabeth
Anderson, Joe
Gauger, Phillip C
Magstadt, Drew R
Zhang, Jianqiang
Bass, Benjamin
Karnezos, Theodore
de Rodas, Brenda
Woodworth, Jason C
Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
title Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
title_full Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
title_fullStr Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
title_full_unstemmed Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
title_short Effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
title_sort effects of medium chain fatty acids as a mitigation or prevention strategy against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in swine feed
topic Animal Health and Well Being
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32447386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa159
work_keys_str_mv AT lernerannieb effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT cochranerogera effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT gebhardtjordant effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT dritzsteves effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT jonescassandrak effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT deroucheyjoelm effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT tokachmiked effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT goodbandrobertd effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT baijianfa effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT porterelizabeth effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT andersonjoe effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT gaugerphillipc effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT magstadtdrewr effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT zhangjianqiang effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT bassbenjamin effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT karnezostheodore effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT derodasbrenda effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed
AT woodworthjasonc effectsofmediumchainfattyacidsasamitigationorpreventionstrategyagainstporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusinswinefeed