Cargando…

Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for intensive behavioral interventions for childhood obesity treatment do not account for variable participant attendance, optimal duration of the intervention, mode of delivery (phone vs. face-to-face), or address obesity prevention among young children. A second...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heerman, William J., Sommer, Evan C., Qi, Ally, Burgess, Laura E., Mitchell, Stephanie J., Samuels, Lauren R., Martin, Nina C., Barkin, Shari L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09020-w
_version_ 1783544025472565248
author Heerman, William J.
Sommer, Evan C.
Qi, Ally
Burgess, Laura E.
Mitchell, Stephanie J.
Samuels, Lauren R.
Martin, Nina C.
Barkin, Shari L.
author_facet Heerman, William J.
Sommer, Evan C.
Qi, Ally
Burgess, Laura E.
Mitchell, Stephanie J.
Samuels, Lauren R.
Martin, Nina C.
Barkin, Shari L.
author_sort Heerman, William J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for intensive behavioral interventions for childhood obesity treatment do not account for variable participant attendance, optimal duration of the intervention, mode of delivery (phone vs. face-to-face), or address obesity prevention among young children. A secondary analysis of an active one-year behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention was conducted to test how “dose delivered” was associated with body mass index z-score (BMI-Z) across 3 years of follow-up. METHODS: Parent-child pairs were eligible if they qualified for government assistance and spoke English or Spanish. Children were between three and 5 years old and were at risk for but not yet obese (BMI percentiles ≥50th and < 95th). The intended intervention dose was 18 h over 3-months via 12 face-to-face “intensive sessions” (90 min each) and 6.75 h over the next 9 months via 9 “maintenance phone calls” (45 min each). Ordinary least-squares multivariable regression was utilized to test for associations between dose delivered and child BMI-Z immediately after the 1-year intervention, and at 2-, and 3-year follow-up, including participants who were initially randomized to the control group as having “zero” dose. RESULTS: Among 610 parent-child pairs (intervention n = 304, control n = 306), mean child age was 4.3 (SD = 0.9) years and 51.8% were female. Mean dose delivered was 10.9 (SD = 2.5) of 12 intensive sessions and 7.7 (SD = 2.4) of 9 maintenance calls. Multivariable linear regression models indicated statistically significant associations of intensive face-to-face contacts (B = -0.011; 95% CI [− 0.021, − 0.001]; p = 0.029) and maintenance calls (B = -0.015; 95% CI [− 0.026, − 0.004]; p = 0.006) with lower BMI-Z immediately following the 1-year intervention. Their interaction was also significant (p = 0.04), such that parent-child pairs who received higher numbers of both face-to-face intensive sessions (> 6) and maintenance calls (> 8) were predicted to have lower BMI-Z. Sustained impacts were not statistically significant at 2- or 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention, the combination of a modest dose of face-to-face sessions (> 6 h over 3 months) with sustained maintenance calls (> 8 calls over 9 months) was associated with improved BMI-Z at 1-year for underserved preschool aged children, but sustained impacts were not statistically significant at 2 or 3 year follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01316653) on March 16, 2011, which was prior to participant enrollment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7281919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72819192020-06-09 Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis Heerman, William J. Sommer, Evan C. Qi, Ally Burgess, Laura E. Mitchell, Stephanie J. Samuels, Lauren R. Martin, Nina C. Barkin, Shari L. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for intensive behavioral interventions for childhood obesity treatment do not account for variable participant attendance, optimal duration of the intervention, mode of delivery (phone vs. face-to-face), or address obesity prevention among young children. A secondary analysis of an active one-year behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention was conducted to test how “dose delivered” was associated with body mass index z-score (BMI-Z) across 3 years of follow-up. METHODS: Parent-child pairs were eligible if they qualified for government assistance and spoke English or Spanish. Children were between three and 5 years old and were at risk for but not yet obese (BMI percentiles ≥50th and < 95th). The intended intervention dose was 18 h over 3-months via 12 face-to-face “intensive sessions” (90 min each) and 6.75 h over the next 9 months via 9 “maintenance phone calls” (45 min each). Ordinary least-squares multivariable regression was utilized to test for associations between dose delivered and child BMI-Z immediately after the 1-year intervention, and at 2-, and 3-year follow-up, including participants who were initially randomized to the control group as having “zero” dose. RESULTS: Among 610 parent-child pairs (intervention n = 304, control n = 306), mean child age was 4.3 (SD = 0.9) years and 51.8% were female. Mean dose delivered was 10.9 (SD = 2.5) of 12 intensive sessions and 7.7 (SD = 2.4) of 9 maintenance calls. Multivariable linear regression models indicated statistically significant associations of intensive face-to-face contacts (B = -0.011; 95% CI [− 0.021, − 0.001]; p = 0.029) and maintenance calls (B = -0.015; 95% CI [− 0.026, − 0.004]; p = 0.006) with lower BMI-Z immediately following the 1-year intervention. Their interaction was also significant (p = 0.04), such that parent-child pairs who received higher numbers of both face-to-face intensive sessions (> 6) and maintenance calls (> 8) were predicted to have lower BMI-Z. Sustained impacts were not statistically significant at 2- or 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention, the combination of a modest dose of face-to-face sessions (> 6 h over 3 months) with sustained maintenance calls (> 8 calls over 9 months) was associated with improved BMI-Z at 1-year for underserved preschool aged children, but sustained impacts were not statistically significant at 2 or 3 year follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01316653) on March 16, 2011, which was prior to participant enrollment. BioMed Central 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7281919/ /pubmed/32513226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09020-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heerman, William J.
Sommer, Evan C.
Qi, Ally
Burgess, Laura E.
Mitchell, Stephanie J.
Samuels, Lauren R.
Martin, Nina C.
Barkin, Shari L.
Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis
title Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis
title_full Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis
title_short Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis
title_sort evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32513226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09020-w
work_keys_str_mv AT heermanwilliamj evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis
AT sommerevanc evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis
AT qially evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis
AT burgesslaurae evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis
AT mitchellstephaniej evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis
AT samuelslaurenr evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis
AT martinninac evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis
AT barkinsharil evaluatingdosedeliveredofabehavioralinterventionforchildhoodobesitypreventionasecondaryanalysis