Cargando…

Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices

Food systems vitally depend on croplands, which are a scarce natural resource. Croplands are also heterogeneous, differing in productive capability and in environmental context. Some are in regions of high biodiversity conservation importance, others in regions vulnerable to food insecurity. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridoutt, Bradley, Anastasiou, Kim, Baird, Danielle, Garcia, Javier Navarro, Hendrie, Gilly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344857
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051212
_version_ 1783544048221421568
author Ridoutt, Bradley
Anastasiou, Kim
Baird, Danielle
Garcia, Javier Navarro
Hendrie, Gilly
author_facet Ridoutt, Bradley
Anastasiou, Kim
Baird, Danielle
Garcia, Javier Navarro
Hendrie, Gilly
author_sort Ridoutt, Bradley
collection PubMed
description Food systems vitally depend on croplands, which are a scarce natural resource. Croplands are also heterogeneous, differing in productive capability and in environmental context. Some are in regions of high biodiversity conservation importance, others in regions vulnerable to food insecurity. In this study, life cycle assessment was used to quantify cropland scarcity footprints, cropland biodiversity footprints and cropland malnutrition footprints for 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. Dietary cropland scarcity footprints averaged 7.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), exceeding a target of 6.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), consistent with the proposed global cropland planetary boundary of 15% of the ice-free land area. Discretionary foods, which are energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods high in saturated fat, added sugars and salt, and alcohol and are not essential to a healthy diet, made the largest contribution, followed by fresh meats and alternatives, breads and cereals, fruit, dairy and alternatives and vegetables. Around 45% of the variation in cropland footprint between individuals was explained by differences in total dietary energy intake. Diets characterised by higher diet quality and lower cropland scarcity footprint required only 4.2 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1) and recommended diets based on the food choices of this subgroup required 5.9 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1). Eating within the global cropland planetary boundary appears realistic if Australians greatly reduce their intake of discretionary foods and moderate their food choices within the “meat and alternatives” food group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7282022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72820222020-06-19 Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices Ridoutt, Bradley Anastasiou, Kim Baird, Danielle Garcia, Javier Navarro Hendrie, Gilly Nutrients Article Food systems vitally depend on croplands, which are a scarce natural resource. Croplands are also heterogeneous, differing in productive capability and in environmental context. Some are in regions of high biodiversity conservation importance, others in regions vulnerable to food insecurity. In this study, life cycle assessment was used to quantify cropland scarcity footprints, cropland biodiversity footprints and cropland malnutrition footprints for 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. Dietary cropland scarcity footprints averaged 7.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), exceeding a target of 6.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), consistent with the proposed global cropland planetary boundary of 15% of the ice-free land area. Discretionary foods, which are energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods high in saturated fat, added sugars and salt, and alcohol and are not essential to a healthy diet, made the largest contribution, followed by fresh meats and alternatives, breads and cereals, fruit, dairy and alternatives and vegetables. Around 45% of the variation in cropland footprint between individuals was explained by differences in total dietary energy intake. Diets characterised by higher diet quality and lower cropland scarcity footprint required only 4.2 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1) and recommended diets based on the food choices of this subgroup required 5.9 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1). Eating within the global cropland planetary boundary appears realistic if Australians greatly reduce their intake of discretionary foods and moderate their food choices within the “meat and alternatives” food group. MDPI 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7282022/ /pubmed/32344857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051212 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ridoutt, Bradley
Anastasiou, Kim
Baird, Danielle
Garcia, Javier Navarro
Hendrie, Gilly
Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_full Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_fullStr Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_full_unstemmed Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_short Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
title_sort cropland footprints of australian dietary choices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344857
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051212
work_keys_str_mv AT ridouttbradley croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices
AT anastasioukim croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices
AT bairddanielle croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices
AT garciajaviernavarro croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices
AT hendriegilly croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices