Cargando…
Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices
Food systems vitally depend on croplands, which are a scarce natural resource. Croplands are also heterogeneous, differing in productive capability and in environmental context. Some are in regions of high biodiversity conservation importance, others in regions vulnerable to food insecurity. In this...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051212 |
_version_ | 1783544048221421568 |
---|---|
author | Ridoutt, Bradley Anastasiou, Kim Baird, Danielle Garcia, Javier Navarro Hendrie, Gilly |
author_facet | Ridoutt, Bradley Anastasiou, Kim Baird, Danielle Garcia, Javier Navarro Hendrie, Gilly |
author_sort | Ridoutt, Bradley |
collection | PubMed |
description | Food systems vitally depend on croplands, which are a scarce natural resource. Croplands are also heterogeneous, differing in productive capability and in environmental context. Some are in regions of high biodiversity conservation importance, others in regions vulnerable to food insecurity. In this study, life cycle assessment was used to quantify cropland scarcity footprints, cropland biodiversity footprints and cropland malnutrition footprints for 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. Dietary cropland scarcity footprints averaged 7.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), exceeding a target of 6.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), consistent with the proposed global cropland planetary boundary of 15% of the ice-free land area. Discretionary foods, which are energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods high in saturated fat, added sugars and salt, and alcohol and are not essential to a healthy diet, made the largest contribution, followed by fresh meats and alternatives, breads and cereals, fruit, dairy and alternatives and vegetables. Around 45% of the variation in cropland footprint between individuals was explained by differences in total dietary energy intake. Diets characterised by higher diet quality and lower cropland scarcity footprint required only 4.2 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1) and recommended diets based on the food choices of this subgroup required 5.9 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1). Eating within the global cropland planetary boundary appears realistic if Australians greatly reduce their intake of discretionary foods and moderate their food choices within the “meat and alternatives” food group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7282022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72820222020-06-19 Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices Ridoutt, Bradley Anastasiou, Kim Baird, Danielle Garcia, Javier Navarro Hendrie, Gilly Nutrients Article Food systems vitally depend on croplands, which are a scarce natural resource. Croplands are also heterogeneous, differing in productive capability and in environmental context. Some are in regions of high biodiversity conservation importance, others in regions vulnerable to food insecurity. In this study, life cycle assessment was used to quantify cropland scarcity footprints, cropland biodiversity footprints and cropland malnutrition footprints for 9341 individual Australian adult daily diets. Dietary cropland scarcity footprints averaged 7.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), exceeding a target of 6.1 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1), consistent with the proposed global cropland planetary boundary of 15% of the ice-free land area. Discretionary foods, which are energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods high in saturated fat, added sugars and salt, and alcohol and are not essential to a healthy diet, made the largest contribution, followed by fresh meats and alternatives, breads and cereals, fruit, dairy and alternatives and vegetables. Around 45% of the variation in cropland footprint between individuals was explained by differences in total dietary energy intake. Diets characterised by higher diet quality and lower cropland scarcity footprint required only 4.2 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1) and recommended diets based on the food choices of this subgroup required 5.9 m(2)yr-e person(−1) day(−1). Eating within the global cropland planetary boundary appears realistic if Australians greatly reduce their intake of discretionary foods and moderate their food choices within the “meat and alternatives” food group. MDPI 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7282022/ /pubmed/32344857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051212 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ridoutt, Bradley Anastasiou, Kim Baird, Danielle Garcia, Javier Navarro Hendrie, Gilly Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices |
title | Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices |
title_full | Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices |
title_fullStr | Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices |
title_full_unstemmed | Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices |
title_short | Cropland Footprints of Australian Dietary Choices |
title_sort | cropland footprints of australian dietary choices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344857 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ridouttbradley croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices AT anastasioukim croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices AT bairddanielle croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices AT garciajaviernavarro croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices AT hendriegilly croplandfootprintsofaustraliandietarychoices |