Cargando…

Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research

OBJECTIVE: To develop a tool to assess the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research. METHODS: We conducted an online survey intended for biomedical editors and authors. The survey aimed to (1) determine if participants endorse the proposed definition of peer-review report quality; (2) i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Superchi, Cecilia, Hren, Darko, Blanco, David, Rius, Roser, Recchioni, Alessandro, Boutron, Isabelle, González, José Antonio
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035604

Ejemplares similares

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
por: Superchi, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis
por: Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Improving the evaluation of worldwide biomedical research output: classification method and standardised bibliometric indicators by disease
por: van de Laar, Lissy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
por: Tijdink, J K, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Arcadia
por: Stoppard, Tom

Arcadia
por: Vega, Lope de, 1562-1635
Publicado: (2001)

Arcadia
por: Crace, Jim 1945-
Publicado: (1994)

Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Data-sharing recommendations in biomedical journals and randomised controlled trials: an audit of journals following the ICMJE recommendations
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews
por: Sorrell, Lexy, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Arcadia portuguesa /
Publicado: (1995)

Building in Arcadia
por: Reed, Ruth
Publicado: (2019)

Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cross-sectional study of the relationship between women’s representation among editors and peer reviewers in journals of the British Medical Journal Publishing Group
por: Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Reviewed Evaluation of Registered End-Points of Randomised Trials (the PRE-REPORT study): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Arcadia: a visualization tool for metabolic pathways
por: Villéger, Alice C., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Does a research article's country of origin affect perception of its quality and relevance? A national trial of US public health researchers
por: Harris, M, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE)
por: Imran, Mahrukh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
por: Cobey, Kelly D, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Employing diffusion of innovation theory for ‘not missing the mass’ in community-engaged research
por: Turin, Tanvir C, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
por: Maggio, Lauren A, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
por: Catalá-López, Ferrán, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study
por: Ivlev, Ilya, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_pjj0uq11ki5j2l9dr4j0ddbpd2