Cargando…

The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students

Young biomedical PhD scientists are needed in a wide variety of careers. Many recent efforts have been focused on revising training approaches to help them choose and prepare for different careers. However, very little is known about how biomedical PhD students decide on and “differentiate” into car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Christine V., Jones, Remi F., Remich, Robin G., Caliendo, Anne E., Langford, Nicole C., Keller, Jill L., Campbell, Patricia B., McGee, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32516342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234259
_version_ 1783544161094336512
author Wood, Christine V.
Jones, Remi F.
Remich, Robin G.
Caliendo, Anne E.
Langford, Nicole C.
Keller, Jill L.
Campbell, Patricia B.
McGee, Richard
author_facet Wood, Christine V.
Jones, Remi F.
Remich, Robin G.
Caliendo, Anne E.
Langford, Nicole C.
Keller, Jill L.
Campbell, Patricia B.
McGee, Richard
author_sort Wood, Christine V.
collection PubMed
description Young biomedical PhD scientists are needed in a wide variety of careers. Many recent efforts have been focused on revising training approaches to help them choose and prepare for different careers. However, very little is known about how biomedical PhD students decide on and “differentiate” into careers, which limits the development of new training models. This knowledge gap also severely limits efforts to increase the representation of women and some racial/ethnic groups in academic research careers. Previous studies have used cross-sectional surveys of career interests and ratings, and have not been designed to identify career intentions. They also are limited by single-time data and response bias, having typically asked participants to recount decisions made years in the past. This report draws on annual, in-depth interviews with 147 biomedical PhD students from the start of the PhD to graduation. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to fully understand scientific development and career intentions over time. Longitudinal analysis reveals a striking level of fluidity and complexity in career intentions over time. Contrary to previous studies and the dominant narrative, data do not show generalized shifts away from academic careers. In addition to those who are consistent in this intention from the start, nearly as many students shift toward research academic careers as away from them, and only modest differences exist by gender and race/ethnicity. Thus, the dominant narrative misses the high fraction of individuals who acquire or sustain their intention to purse an academic research career during training. Efforts to increase diversity in academia must capitalize on and support those who are still considering and evolve toward an academic career. Efforts to revise research training should incorporate knowledge of the tremendous fluidity in when and how career differentiation occurs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7282657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72826572020-06-17 The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students Wood, Christine V. Jones, Remi F. Remich, Robin G. Caliendo, Anne E. Langford, Nicole C. Keller, Jill L. Campbell, Patricia B. McGee, Richard PLoS One Research Article Young biomedical PhD scientists are needed in a wide variety of careers. Many recent efforts have been focused on revising training approaches to help them choose and prepare for different careers. However, very little is known about how biomedical PhD students decide on and “differentiate” into careers, which limits the development of new training models. This knowledge gap also severely limits efforts to increase the representation of women and some racial/ethnic groups in academic research careers. Previous studies have used cross-sectional surveys of career interests and ratings, and have not been designed to identify career intentions. They also are limited by single-time data and response bias, having typically asked participants to recount decisions made years in the past. This report draws on annual, in-depth interviews with 147 biomedical PhD students from the start of the PhD to graduation. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to fully understand scientific development and career intentions over time. Longitudinal analysis reveals a striking level of fluidity and complexity in career intentions over time. Contrary to previous studies and the dominant narrative, data do not show generalized shifts away from academic careers. In addition to those who are consistent in this intention from the start, nearly as many students shift toward research academic careers as away from them, and only modest differences exist by gender and race/ethnicity. Thus, the dominant narrative misses the high fraction of individuals who acquire or sustain their intention to purse an academic research career during training. Efforts to increase diversity in academia must capitalize on and support those who are still considering and evolve toward an academic career. Efforts to revise research training should incorporate knowledge of the tremendous fluidity in when and how career differentiation occurs. Public Library of Science 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7282657/ /pubmed/32516342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234259 Text en © 2020 Wood et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wood, Christine V.
Jones, Remi F.
Remich, Robin G.
Caliendo, Anne E.
Langford, Nicole C.
Keller, Jill L.
Campbell, Patricia B.
McGee, Richard
The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students
title The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students
title_full The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students
title_fullStr The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students
title_full_unstemmed The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students
title_short The National Longitudinal Study of Young Life Scientists: Career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical PhD students
title_sort national longitudinal study of young life scientists: career differentiation among a diverse group of biomedical phd students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32516342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234259
work_keys_str_mv AT woodchristinev thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT jonesremif thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT remichrobing thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT caliendoannee thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT langfordnicolec thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT kellerjilll thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT campbellpatriciab thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT mcgeerichard thenationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT woodchristinev nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT jonesremif nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT remichrobing nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT caliendoannee nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT langfordnicolec nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT kellerjilll nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT campbellpatriciab nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents
AT mcgeerichard nationallongitudinalstudyofyounglifescientistscareerdifferentiationamongadiversegroupofbiomedicalphdstudents