Cargando…
Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
A consensus workshop on low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) was held in November 2018 where seventeen experts (the panel) discussed three themes identified as key to the science and policy of LCS: (1) weight management and glucose control; (2) consumption, safety and perception; (3) nutrition policy. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31928558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422419000283 |
_version_ | 1783544202845487104 |
---|---|
author | Ashwell, Margaret Gibson, Sigrid Bellisle, France Buttriss, Judith Drewnowski, Adam Fantino, Marc Gallagher, Alison M. de Graaf, Kees Goscinny, Séverine Hardman, Charlotte A. Laviada-Molina, Hugo López-García, Rebeca Magnuson, Berna Mellor, Duane Rogers, Peter J. Rowland, Ian Russell, Wendy Sievenpiper, John L. la Vecchia, Carlo |
author_facet | Ashwell, Margaret Gibson, Sigrid Bellisle, France Buttriss, Judith Drewnowski, Adam Fantino, Marc Gallagher, Alison M. de Graaf, Kees Goscinny, Séverine Hardman, Charlotte A. Laviada-Molina, Hugo López-García, Rebeca Magnuson, Berna Mellor, Duane Rogers, Peter J. Rowland, Ian Russell, Wendy Sievenpiper, John L. la Vecchia, Carlo |
author_sort | Ashwell, Margaret |
collection | PubMed |
description | A consensus workshop on low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) was held in November 2018 where seventeen experts (the panel) discussed three themes identified as key to the science and policy of LCS: (1) weight management and glucose control; (2) consumption, safety and perception; (3) nutrition policy. The aims were to identify the reliable facts on LCS, suggest research gaps and propose future actions. The panel agreed that the safety of LCS is demonstrated by a substantial body of evidence reviewed by regulatory experts and current levels of consumption, even for high users, are within agreed safety margins. However, better risk communication is needed. More emphasis is required on the role of LCS in helping individuals reduce their sugar and energy intake, which is a public health priority. Based on reviews of clinical evidence to date, the panel concluded that LCS can be beneficial for weight management when they are used to replace sugar in products consumed in the diet (without energy substitution). The available evidence suggests no grounds for concerns about adverse effects of LCS on sweet preference, appetite or glucose control; indeed, LCS may improve diabetic control and dietary compliance. Regarding effects on the human gut microbiota, data are limited and do not provide adequate evidence that LCS affect gut health at doses relevant to human use. The panel identified research priorities, including collation of the totality of evidence on LCS and body weight control, monitoring and modelling of LCS intakes, impacts on sugar reduction and diet quality and developing effective communication strategies to foster informed choice. There is also a need to reconcile policy discrepancies between organisations and reduce regulatory hurdles that impede low-energy product development and reformulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7282854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72828542020-06-17 Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions Ashwell, Margaret Gibson, Sigrid Bellisle, France Buttriss, Judith Drewnowski, Adam Fantino, Marc Gallagher, Alison M. de Graaf, Kees Goscinny, Séverine Hardman, Charlotte A. Laviada-Molina, Hugo López-García, Rebeca Magnuson, Berna Mellor, Duane Rogers, Peter J. Rowland, Ian Russell, Wendy Sievenpiper, John L. la Vecchia, Carlo Nutr Res Rev Review Article A consensus workshop on low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) was held in November 2018 where seventeen experts (the panel) discussed three themes identified as key to the science and policy of LCS: (1) weight management and glucose control; (2) consumption, safety and perception; (3) nutrition policy. The aims were to identify the reliable facts on LCS, suggest research gaps and propose future actions. The panel agreed that the safety of LCS is demonstrated by a substantial body of evidence reviewed by regulatory experts and current levels of consumption, even for high users, are within agreed safety margins. However, better risk communication is needed. More emphasis is required on the role of LCS in helping individuals reduce their sugar and energy intake, which is a public health priority. Based on reviews of clinical evidence to date, the panel concluded that LCS can be beneficial for weight management when they are used to replace sugar in products consumed in the diet (without energy substitution). The available evidence suggests no grounds for concerns about adverse effects of LCS on sweet preference, appetite or glucose control; indeed, LCS may improve diabetic control and dietary compliance. Regarding effects on the human gut microbiota, data are limited and do not provide adequate evidence that LCS affect gut health at doses relevant to human use. The panel identified research priorities, including collation of the totality of evidence on LCS and body weight control, monitoring and modelling of LCS intakes, impacts on sugar reduction and diet quality and developing effective communication strategies to foster informed choice. There is also a need to reconcile policy discrepancies between organisations and reduce regulatory hurdles that impede low-energy product development and reformulation. Cambridge University Press 2020-06 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7282854/ /pubmed/31928558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422419000283 Text en © The Authors 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ashwell, Margaret Gibson, Sigrid Bellisle, France Buttriss, Judith Drewnowski, Adam Fantino, Marc Gallagher, Alison M. de Graaf, Kees Goscinny, Séverine Hardman, Charlotte A. Laviada-Molina, Hugo López-García, Rebeca Magnuson, Berna Mellor, Duane Rogers, Peter J. Rowland, Ian Russell, Wendy Sievenpiper, John L. la Vecchia, Carlo Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions |
title | Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions |
title_full | Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions |
title_fullStr | Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions |
title_full_unstemmed | Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions |
title_short | Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions |
title_sort | expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31928558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422419000283 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashwellmargaret expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT gibsonsigrid expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT bellislefrance expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT buttrissjudith expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT drewnowskiadam expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT fantinomarc expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT gallagheralisonm expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT degraafkees expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT goscinnyseverine expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT hardmancharlottea expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT laviadamolinahugo expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT lopezgarciarebeca expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT magnusonberna expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT mellorduane expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT rogerspeterj expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT rowlandian expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT russellwendy expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT sievenpiperjohnl expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions AT lavecchiacarlo expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions |