Cargando…

Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions

A consensus workshop on low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) was held in November 2018 where seventeen experts (the panel) discussed three themes identified as key to the science and policy of LCS: (1) weight management and glucose control; (2) consumption, safety and perception; (3) nutrition policy. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashwell, Margaret, Gibson, Sigrid, Bellisle, France, Buttriss, Judith, Drewnowski, Adam, Fantino, Marc, Gallagher, Alison M., de Graaf, Kees, Goscinny, Séverine, Hardman, Charlotte A., Laviada-Molina, Hugo, López-García, Rebeca, Magnuson, Berna, Mellor, Duane, Rogers, Peter J., Rowland, Ian, Russell, Wendy, Sievenpiper, John L., la Vecchia, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31928558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422419000283
_version_ 1783544202845487104
author Ashwell, Margaret
Gibson, Sigrid
Bellisle, France
Buttriss, Judith
Drewnowski, Adam
Fantino, Marc
Gallagher, Alison M.
de Graaf, Kees
Goscinny, Séverine
Hardman, Charlotte A.
Laviada-Molina, Hugo
López-García, Rebeca
Magnuson, Berna
Mellor, Duane
Rogers, Peter J.
Rowland, Ian
Russell, Wendy
Sievenpiper, John L.
la Vecchia, Carlo
author_facet Ashwell, Margaret
Gibson, Sigrid
Bellisle, France
Buttriss, Judith
Drewnowski, Adam
Fantino, Marc
Gallagher, Alison M.
de Graaf, Kees
Goscinny, Séverine
Hardman, Charlotte A.
Laviada-Molina, Hugo
López-García, Rebeca
Magnuson, Berna
Mellor, Duane
Rogers, Peter J.
Rowland, Ian
Russell, Wendy
Sievenpiper, John L.
la Vecchia, Carlo
author_sort Ashwell, Margaret
collection PubMed
description A consensus workshop on low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) was held in November 2018 where seventeen experts (the panel) discussed three themes identified as key to the science and policy of LCS: (1) weight management and glucose control; (2) consumption, safety and perception; (3) nutrition policy. The aims were to identify the reliable facts on LCS, suggest research gaps and propose future actions. The panel agreed that the safety of LCS is demonstrated by a substantial body of evidence reviewed by regulatory experts and current levels of consumption, even for high users, are within agreed safety margins. However, better risk communication is needed. More emphasis is required on the role of LCS in helping individuals reduce their sugar and energy intake, which is a public health priority. Based on reviews of clinical evidence to date, the panel concluded that LCS can be beneficial for weight management when they are used to replace sugar in products consumed in the diet (without energy substitution). The available evidence suggests no grounds for concerns about adverse effects of LCS on sweet preference, appetite or glucose control; indeed, LCS may improve diabetic control and dietary compliance. Regarding effects on the human gut microbiota, data are limited and do not provide adequate evidence that LCS affect gut health at doses relevant to human use. The panel identified research priorities, including collation of the totality of evidence on LCS and body weight control, monitoring and modelling of LCS intakes, impacts on sugar reduction and diet quality and developing effective communication strategies to foster informed choice. There is also a need to reconcile policy discrepancies between organisations and reduce regulatory hurdles that impede low-energy product development and reformulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7282854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72828542020-06-17 Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions Ashwell, Margaret Gibson, Sigrid Bellisle, France Buttriss, Judith Drewnowski, Adam Fantino, Marc Gallagher, Alison M. de Graaf, Kees Goscinny, Séverine Hardman, Charlotte A. Laviada-Molina, Hugo López-García, Rebeca Magnuson, Berna Mellor, Duane Rogers, Peter J. Rowland, Ian Russell, Wendy Sievenpiper, John L. la Vecchia, Carlo Nutr Res Rev Review Article A consensus workshop on low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) was held in November 2018 where seventeen experts (the panel) discussed three themes identified as key to the science and policy of LCS: (1) weight management and glucose control; (2) consumption, safety and perception; (3) nutrition policy. The aims were to identify the reliable facts on LCS, suggest research gaps and propose future actions. The panel agreed that the safety of LCS is demonstrated by a substantial body of evidence reviewed by regulatory experts and current levels of consumption, even for high users, are within agreed safety margins. However, better risk communication is needed. More emphasis is required on the role of LCS in helping individuals reduce their sugar and energy intake, which is a public health priority. Based on reviews of clinical evidence to date, the panel concluded that LCS can be beneficial for weight management when they are used to replace sugar in products consumed in the diet (without energy substitution). The available evidence suggests no grounds for concerns about adverse effects of LCS on sweet preference, appetite or glucose control; indeed, LCS may improve diabetic control and dietary compliance. Regarding effects on the human gut microbiota, data are limited and do not provide adequate evidence that LCS affect gut health at doses relevant to human use. The panel identified research priorities, including collation of the totality of evidence on LCS and body weight control, monitoring and modelling of LCS intakes, impacts on sugar reduction and diet quality and developing effective communication strategies to foster informed choice. There is also a need to reconcile policy discrepancies between organisations and reduce regulatory hurdles that impede low-energy product development and reformulation. Cambridge University Press 2020-06 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7282854/ /pubmed/31928558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422419000283 Text en © The Authors 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ashwell, Margaret
Gibson, Sigrid
Bellisle, France
Buttriss, Judith
Drewnowski, Adam
Fantino, Marc
Gallagher, Alison M.
de Graaf, Kees
Goscinny, Séverine
Hardman, Charlotte A.
Laviada-Molina, Hugo
López-García, Rebeca
Magnuson, Berna
Mellor, Duane
Rogers, Peter J.
Rowland, Ian
Russell, Wendy
Sievenpiper, John L.
la Vecchia, Carlo
Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
title Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
title_full Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
title_fullStr Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
title_full_unstemmed Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
title_short Expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
title_sort expert consensus on low-calorie sweeteners: facts, research gaps and suggested actions
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31928558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954422419000283
work_keys_str_mv AT ashwellmargaret expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT gibsonsigrid expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT bellislefrance expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT buttrissjudith expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT drewnowskiadam expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT fantinomarc expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT gallagheralisonm expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT degraafkees expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT goscinnyseverine expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT hardmancharlottea expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT laviadamolinahugo expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT lopezgarciarebeca expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT magnusonberna expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT mellorduane expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT rogerspeterj expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT rowlandian expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT russellwendy expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT sievenpiperjohnl expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions
AT lavecchiacarlo expertconsensusonlowcaloriesweetenersfactsresearchgapsandsuggestedactions