Cargando…
Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States
Cervical cancer is widely preventable through screening, but little is known about the duration of protection offered by a negative screen in North America. A case–control study was conducted with records from population‐based registries in New Mexico. Cases were women diagnosed with cervical cancer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31837006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32826 |
_version_ | 1783544211301203968 |
---|---|
author | Landy, Rebecca Sasieni, Peter D. Mathews, Christopher Wiggins, Charles L. Robertson, Michael McDonald, Yolanda J. Goldberg, Daniel W. Scarinci, Isabel C. Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M. |
author_facet | Landy, Rebecca Sasieni, Peter D. Mathews, Christopher Wiggins, Charles L. Robertson, Michael McDonald, Yolanda J. Goldberg, Daniel W. Scarinci, Isabel C. Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M. |
author_sort | Landy, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cervical cancer is widely preventable through screening, but little is known about the duration of protection offered by a negative screen in North America. A case–control study was conducted with records from population‐based registries in New Mexico. Cases were women diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2006–2016, obtained from the Tumor Registry. Five controls per case from the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry were matched to cases by sex, age and place of residence. Dates and results of all cervical screening and diagnostic tests since 2006 were identified from the pap registry. We estimated the odds ratio of nonlocalized (Stage II+) and localized (Stage I) cervical cancer associated with attending screening in the 3 years prior to case‐diagnosis compared to women not screened in 5 years. Of 876 cases, 527 were aged 25–64 years with ≥3 years of potential screening data. Only 38% of cases and 61% of controls attended screening in a 3‐year period. Women screened in the 3 years prior to diagnosis had 83% lower risk of nonlocalized cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12–0.24) and 48% lower odds of localized cancer (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38–0.72), compared to women not screened in the 5 years prior to diagnosis. Women remained at low risk of nonlocalized cancer for 3.5–5 years after a negative screen compared to women with no negative screens in the 5 years prior to diagnosis. Routine cervical screening is effective at preventing localized and nonlocalized cervical cancers; 3 yearly screening prevents 83% of nonlocalized cancers, with no additional benefit of more frequent screening. Increasing screening coverage remains essential to further reduce cervical cancer incidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7282928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72829282020-06-29 Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States Landy, Rebecca Sasieni, Peter D. Mathews, Christopher Wiggins, Charles L. Robertson, Michael McDonald, Yolanda J. Goldberg, Daniel W. Scarinci, Isabel C. Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M. Int J Cancer Cancer Epidemiology Cervical cancer is widely preventable through screening, but little is known about the duration of protection offered by a negative screen in North America. A case–control study was conducted with records from population‐based registries in New Mexico. Cases were women diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2006–2016, obtained from the Tumor Registry. Five controls per case from the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry were matched to cases by sex, age and place of residence. Dates and results of all cervical screening and diagnostic tests since 2006 were identified from the pap registry. We estimated the odds ratio of nonlocalized (Stage II+) and localized (Stage I) cervical cancer associated with attending screening in the 3 years prior to case‐diagnosis compared to women not screened in 5 years. Of 876 cases, 527 were aged 25–64 years with ≥3 years of potential screening data. Only 38% of cases and 61% of controls attended screening in a 3‐year period. Women screened in the 3 years prior to diagnosis had 83% lower risk of nonlocalized cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12–0.24) and 48% lower odds of localized cancer (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38–0.72), compared to women not screened in the 5 years prior to diagnosis. Women remained at low risk of nonlocalized cancer for 3.5–5 years after a negative screen compared to women with no negative screens in the 5 years prior to diagnosis. Routine cervical screening is effective at preventing localized and nonlocalized cervical cancers; 3 yearly screening prevents 83% of nonlocalized cancers, with no additional benefit of more frequent screening. Increasing screening coverage remains essential to further reduce cervical cancer incidence. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-12-31 2020-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7282928/ /pubmed/31837006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32826 Text en © 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cancer Epidemiology Landy, Rebecca Sasieni, Peter D. Mathews, Christopher Wiggins, Charles L. Robertson, Michael McDonald, Yolanda J. Goldberg, Daniel W. Scarinci, Isabel C. Cuzick, Jack Wheeler, Cosette M. Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States |
title | Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States |
title_full | Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States |
title_fullStr | Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States |
title_short | Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population‐based case–control study in the United States |
title_sort | impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: a population‐based case–control study in the united states |
topic | Cancer Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7282928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31837006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT landyrebecca impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT sasienipeterd impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT mathewschristopher impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT wigginscharlesl impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT robertsonmichael impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT mcdonaldyolandaj impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT goldbergdanielw impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT scarinciisabelc impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT cuzickjack impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT wheelercosettem impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates AT impactofscreeningoncervicalcancerincidenceapopulationbasedcasecontrolstudyintheunitedstates |