Cargando…

Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing

BACKGROUND: Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as demonstrated by a growing number of prospective trials. OBJECTIVE: We quantified the costs of delivery of consolidative RT for common clinical pathways ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pezzi, Todd A., Ning, Matthew S., Thaker, Nikhil G., Boyce-Fappiano, David, Gjyshi, Olsi, Olivieri, Nicholas D., Guzman, Alexis B., Incalcaterra, James R., Mesko, Shane, Gandhi, Saumil, Chun, Stephen, Tang, Chad, Frank, Steven J., Gomez, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.007
_version_ 1783544225876410368
author Pezzi, Todd A.
Ning, Matthew S.
Thaker, Nikhil G.
Boyce-Fappiano, David
Gjyshi, Olsi
Olivieri, Nicholas D.
Guzman, Alexis B.
Incalcaterra, James R.
Mesko, Shane
Gandhi, Saumil
Chun, Stephen
Tang, Chad
Frank, Steven J.
Gomez, Daniel R.
author_facet Pezzi, Todd A.
Ning, Matthew S.
Thaker, Nikhil G.
Boyce-Fappiano, David
Gjyshi, Olsi
Olivieri, Nicholas D.
Guzman, Alexis B.
Incalcaterra, James R.
Mesko, Shane
Gandhi, Saumil
Chun, Stephen
Tang, Chad
Frank, Steven J.
Gomez, Daniel R.
author_sort Pezzi, Todd A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as demonstrated by a growing number of prospective trials. OBJECTIVE: We quantified the costs of delivery of consolidative RT for common clinical pathways associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC, by applying time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology. METHODS: Full cycle costs were evaluated for 4 consolidative treatment regimens: (Regimen #1) 10-fraction 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) as palliation of a distant site; (#2) 15-fraction intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) to the primary thoracic disease; (#3) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus 4-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to a single oligometastatic site; and (#4) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus two courses of 4-fraction SABR for two oligometastatic sites. RESULTS: For each of the four treatment regimens, personnel represented a greater proportion of total cost when compared with equipment, totaling 61.0%, 65.9%, 66.2%, and 66.4% of the total cost of each care cycle, respectively. In total, a 10-fraction regimen of 3D-CRT to a distant site represented just 37.2% of the total cost of the most expensive course. Compared to total costs for 15-fraction IMRT alone, each additional sequential course of 4-fraction SABR imparted a cost increase of 43%. CONCLUSION: This analysis uses TDABC to estimate the relative internal costs of various RT strategies associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC. This methodology will become increasingly relevant to each organization in context of the anticipated mandate of alternative/bundled payment models for radiation oncology by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7283089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72830892020-06-10 Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing Pezzi, Todd A. Ning, Matthew S. Thaker, Nikhil G. Boyce-Fappiano, David Gjyshi, Olsi Olivieri, Nicholas D. Guzman, Alexis B. Incalcaterra, James R. Mesko, Shane Gandhi, Saumil Chun, Stephen Tang, Chad Frank, Steven J. Gomez, Daniel R. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article BACKGROUND: Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as demonstrated by a growing number of prospective trials. OBJECTIVE: We quantified the costs of delivery of consolidative RT for common clinical pathways associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC, by applying time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology. METHODS: Full cycle costs were evaluated for 4 consolidative treatment regimens: (Regimen #1) 10-fraction 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) as palliation of a distant site; (#2) 15-fraction intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) to the primary thoracic disease; (#3) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus 4-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to a single oligometastatic site; and (#4) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus two courses of 4-fraction SABR for two oligometastatic sites. RESULTS: For each of the four treatment regimens, personnel represented a greater proportion of total cost when compared with equipment, totaling 61.0%, 65.9%, 66.2%, and 66.4% of the total cost of each care cycle, respectively. In total, a 10-fraction regimen of 3D-CRT to a distant site represented just 37.2% of the total cost of the most expensive course. Compared to total costs for 15-fraction IMRT alone, each additional sequential course of 4-fraction SABR imparted a cost increase of 43%. CONCLUSION: This analysis uses TDABC to estimate the relative internal costs of various RT strategies associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC. This methodology will become increasingly relevant to each organization in context of the anticipated mandate of alternative/bundled payment models for radiation oncology by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Elsevier 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7283089/ /pubmed/32529054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.007 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pezzi, Todd A.
Ning, Matthew S.
Thaker, Nikhil G.
Boyce-Fappiano, David
Gjyshi, Olsi
Olivieri, Nicholas D.
Guzman, Alexis B.
Incalcaterra, James R.
Mesko, Shane
Gandhi, Saumil
Chun, Stephen
Tang, Chad
Frank, Steven J.
Gomez, Daniel R.
Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
title Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
title_full Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
title_fullStr Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
title_short Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
title_sort evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.007
work_keys_str_mv AT pezzitodda evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT ningmatthews evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT thakernikhilg evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT boycefappianodavid evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT gjyshiolsi evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT olivierinicholasd evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT guzmanalexisb evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT incalcaterrajamesr evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT meskoshane evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT gandhisaumil evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT chunstephen evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT tangchad evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT frankstevenj evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting
AT gomezdanielr evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting