Cargando…
Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing
BACKGROUND: Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as demonstrated by a growing number of prospective trials. OBJECTIVE: We quantified the costs of delivery of consolidative RT for common clinical pathways ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.007 |
_version_ | 1783544225876410368 |
---|---|
author | Pezzi, Todd A. Ning, Matthew S. Thaker, Nikhil G. Boyce-Fappiano, David Gjyshi, Olsi Olivieri, Nicholas D. Guzman, Alexis B. Incalcaterra, James R. Mesko, Shane Gandhi, Saumil Chun, Stephen Tang, Chad Frank, Steven J. Gomez, Daniel R. |
author_facet | Pezzi, Todd A. Ning, Matthew S. Thaker, Nikhil G. Boyce-Fappiano, David Gjyshi, Olsi Olivieri, Nicholas D. Guzman, Alexis B. Incalcaterra, James R. Mesko, Shane Gandhi, Saumil Chun, Stephen Tang, Chad Frank, Steven J. Gomez, Daniel R. |
author_sort | Pezzi, Todd A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as demonstrated by a growing number of prospective trials. OBJECTIVE: We quantified the costs of delivery of consolidative RT for common clinical pathways associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC, by applying time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology. METHODS: Full cycle costs were evaluated for 4 consolidative treatment regimens: (Regimen #1) 10-fraction 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) as palliation of a distant site; (#2) 15-fraction intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) to the primary thoracic disease; (#3) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus 4-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to a single oligometastatic site; and (#4) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus two courses of 4-fraction SABR for two oligometastatic sites. RESULTS: For each of the four treatment regimens, personnel represented a greater proportion of total cost when compared with equipment, totaling 61.0%, 65.9%, 66.2%, and 66.4% of the total cost of each care cycle, respectively. In total, a 10-fraction regimen of 3D-CRT to a distant site represented just 37.2% of the total cost of the most expensive course. Compared to total costs for 15-fraction IMRT alone, each additional sequential course of 4-fraction SABR imparted a cost increase of 43%. CONCLUSION: This analysis uses TDABC to estimate the relative internal costs of various RT strategies associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC. This methodology will become increasingly relevant to each organization in context of the anticipated mandate of alternative/bundled payment models for radiation oncology by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7283089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72830892020-06-10 Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing Pezzi, Todd A. Ning, Matthew S. Thaker, Nikhil G. Boyce-Fappiano, David Gjyshi, Olsi Olivieri, Nicholas D. Guzman, Alexis B. Incalcaterra, James R. Mesko, Shane Gandhi, Saumil Chun, Stephen Tang, Chad Frank, Steven J. Gomez, Daniel R. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Article BACKGROUND: Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as demonstrated by a growing number of prospective trials. OBJECTIVE: We quantified the costs of delivery of consolidative RT for common clinical pathways associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC, by applying time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology. METHODS: Full cycle costs were evaluated for 4 consolidative treatment regimens: (Regimen #1) 10-fraction 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) as palliation of a distant site; (#2) 15-fraction intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) to the primary thoracic disease; (#3) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus 4-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to a single oligometastatic site; and (#4) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus two courses of 4-fraction SABR for two oligometastatic sites. RESULTS: For each of the four treatment regimens, personnel represented a greater proportion of total cost when compared with equipment, totaling 61.0%, 65.9%, 66.2%, and 66.4% of the total cost of each care cycle, respectively. In total, a 10-fraction regimen of 3D-CRT to a distant site represented just 37.2% of the total cost of the most expensive course. Compared to total costs for 15-fraction IMRT alone, each additional sequential course of 4-fraction SABR imparted a cost increase of 43%. CONCLUSION: This analysis uses TDABC to estimate the relative internal costs of various RT strategies associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC. This methodology will become increasingly relevant to each organization in context of the anticipated mandate of alternative/bundled payment models for radiation oncology by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Elsevier 2020-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7283089/ /pubmed/32529054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.007 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pezzi, Todd A. Ning, Matthew S. Thaker, Nikhil G. Boyce-Fappiano, David Gjyshi, Olsi Olivieri, Nicholas D. Guzman, Alexis B. Incalcaterra, James R. Mesko, Shane Gandhi, Saumil Chun, Stephen Tang, Chad Frank, Steven J. Gomez, Daniel R. Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing |
title | Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing |
title_full | Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing |
title_fullStr | Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing |
title_short | Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing |
title_sort | evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pezzitodda evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT ningmatthews evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT thakernikhilg evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT boycefappianodavid evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT gjyshiolsi evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT olivierinicholasd evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT guzmanalexisb evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT incalcaterrajamesr evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT meskoshane evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT gandhisaumil evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT chunstephen evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT tangchad evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT frankstevenj evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting AT gomezdanielr evaluatingsingleinstitutionresourcecostsofconsolidativeradiotherapyforoligometastaticnonsmallcelllungcancerusingtimedrivenactivitybasedcosting |