Cargando…
Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products
Malaria vaccine development entered a new era in 2015 when the pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum candidate RTS,S was favorably reviewed by the European Medicines Agency and subsequently introduced into national pilot implementation programs, marking the first human anti-parasite vaccine to pass...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-020-0196-3 |
_version_ | 1783544261119049728 |
---|---|
author | Duffy, Patrick E. Patrick Gorres, J. |
author_facet | Duffy, Patrick E. Patrick Gorres, J. |
author_sort | Duffy, Patrick E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Malaria vaccine development entered a new era in 2015 when the pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum candidate RTS,S was favorably reviewed by the European Medicines Agency and subsequently introduced into national pilot implementation programs, marking the first human anti-parasite vaccine to pass regulatory scrutiny. Since the first trials published in 1997, RTS,S has been evaluated in a series of clinical trials culminating in Phase 3 testing, while testing of other pre-erythrocytic candidates (that target sporozoite- or liver-stage parasites), particularly whole sporozoite vaccines, has also increased. Interest in blood-stage candidates (that limit blood-stage parasite growth) subsided after disappointing human efficacy results, although new blood-stage targets and concepts may revive activity in this area. Over the past decade, testing of transmission-blocking vaccines (that kill mosquito/sexual-stage parasites) advanced to field trials and the first generation of placental malaria vaccines (that clear placenta-sequestering parasites) entered the clinic. Novel antigen discovery, human monoclonal antibodies, structural vaccinology, and improved platforms promise to expand on RTS,S and improve existing vaccine candidates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7283239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72832392020-06-19 Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products Duffy, Patrick E. Patrick Gorres, J. NPJ Vaccines Review Article Malaria vaccine development entered a new era in 2015 when the pre-erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum candidate RTS,S was favorably reviewed by the European Medicines Agency and subsequently introduced into national pilot implementation programs, marking the first human anti-parasite vaccine to pass regulatory scrutiny. Since the first trials published in 1997, RTS,S has been evaluated in a series of clinical trials culminating in Phase 3 testing, while testing of other pre-erythrocytic candidates (that target sporozoite- or liver-stage parasites), particularly whole sporozoite vaccines, has also increased. Interest in blood-stage candidates (that limit blood-stage parasite growth) subsided after disappointing human efficacy results, although new blood-stage targets and concepts may revive activity in this area. Over the past decade, testing of transmission-blocking vaccines (that kill mosquito/sexual-stage parasites) advanced to field trials and the first generation of placental malaria vaccines (that clear placenta-sequestering parasites) entered the clinic. Novel antigen discovery, human monoclonal antibodies, structural vaccinology, and improved platforms promise to expand on RTS,S and improve existing vaccine candidates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7283239/ /pubmed/32566259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-020-0196-3 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Duffy, Patrick E. Patrick Gorres, J. Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products |
title | Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products |
title_full | Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products |
title_fullStr | Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products |
title_full_unstemmed | Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products |
title_short | Malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products |
title_sort | malaria vaccines since 2000: progress, priorities, products |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-020-0196-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duffypatricke malariavaccinessince2000progressprioritiesproducts AT patrickgorresj malariavaccinessince2000progressprioritiesproducts |