Cargando…

Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield

BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roos, Victorine H., Kallenberg, Frank G. J., van der Vlugt, Manon, Bongers, Evelien J. C., Aalfs, Cora M., Bossuyt, Patrick M. M., Dekker, Evelien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8
_version_ 1783544271707570176
author Roos, Victorine H.
Kallenberg, Frank G. J.
van der Vlugt, Manon
Bongers, Evelien J. C.
Aalfs, Cora M.
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Dekker, Evelien
author_facet Roos, Victorine H.
Kallenberg, Frank G. J.
van der Vlugt, Manon
Bongers, Evelien J. C.
Aalfs, Cora M.
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Dekker, Evelien
author_sort Roos, Victorine H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (FHQ) on colorectal cancer (CRC) and Lynch syndrome-associated tumours to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme. METHODS: Six thousand screen-naive individuals, aged 59–75 years, were invited to complete a FIT (FOB-Gold, cut-off 47 µg Hb/g faeces) and a validated online FHQ. Participants with a positive FIT and/or positive FHQ, confirmed after genetic counselling, were referred for colonoscopy. Yield of detecting AN per 1000 invitees for the combined strategy was compared with the FIT-only strategy. RESULTS: Of the 5979 invitees, 1952 (32.6%) completed the FIT only, 2379 (39.8%) completed both the FIT and FHQ and 95 (1.6%) completed the FHQ only. Addition of the FHQ to FIT-based screening resulted in one extra case of AN detected after 16 additional colonoscopies, resulting in a yield of 19.6 (95% CI, 16.4–23.5) for the combined strategy versus 19.5 (95% CI, 16.3–23.3) for the FIT-only strategy (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an FHQ to one round of FIT screening did not increase the detection of AN compared with FIT only (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698462).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7283285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72832852021-04-20 Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield Roos, Victorine H. Kallenberg, Frank G. J. van der Vlugt, Manon Bongers, Evelien J. C. Aalfs, Cora M. Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Dekker, Evelien Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (FHQ) on colorectal cancer (CRC) and Lynch syndrome-associated tumours to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme. METHODS: Six thousand screen-naive individuals, aged 59–75 years, were invited to complete a FIT (FOB-Gold, cut-off 47 µg Hb/g faeces) and a validated online FHQ. Participants with a positive FIT and/or positive FHQ, confirmed after genetic counselling, were referred for colonoscopy. Yield of detecting AN per 1000 invitees for the combined strategy was compared with the FIT-only strategy. RESULTS: Of the 5979 invitees, 1952 (32.6%) completed the FIT only, 2379 (39.8%) completed both the FIT and FHQ and 95 (1.6%) completed the FHQ only. Addition of the FHQ to FIT-based screening resulted in one extra case of AN detected after 16 additional colonoscopies, resulting in a yield of 19.6 (95% CI, 16.4–23.5) for the combined strategy versus 19.5 (95% CI, 16.3–23.3) for the FIT-only strategy (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an FHQ to one round of FIT screening did not increase the detection of AN compared with FIT only (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698462). Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-20 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7283285/ /pubmed/32307443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Roos, Victorine H.
Kallenberg, Frank G. J.
van der Vlugt, Manon
Bongers, Evelien J. C.
Aalfs, Cora M.
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Dekker, Evelien
Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
title Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
title_full Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
title_fullStr Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
title_full_unstemmed Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
title_short Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
title_sort addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the dutch fit-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8
work_keys_str_mv AT roosvictorineh additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield
AT kallenbergfrankgj additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield
AT vandervlugtmanon additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield
AT bongersevelienjc additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield
AT aalfscoram additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield
AT bossuytpatrickmm additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield
AT dekkerevelien additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield