Cargando…
Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield
BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (F...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8 |
_version_ | 1783544271707570176 |
---|---|
author | Roos, Victorine H. Kallenberg, Frank G. J. van der Vlugt, Manon Bongers, Evelien J. C. Aalfs, Cora M. Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Dekker, Evelien |
author_facet | Roos, Victorine H. Kallenberg, Frank G. J. van der Vlugt, Manon Bongers, Evelien J. C. Aalfs, Cora M. Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Dekker, Evelien |
author_sort | Roos, Victorine H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (FHQ) on colorectal cancer (CRC) and Lynch syndrome-associated tumours to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme. METHODS: Six thousand screen-naive individuals, aged 59–75 years, were invited to complete a FIT (FOB-Gold, cut-off 47 µg Hb/g faeces) and a validated online FHQ. Participants with a positive FIT and/or positive FHQ, confirmed after genetic counselling, were referred for colonoscopy. Yield of detecting AN per 1000 invitees for the combined strategy was compared with the FIT-only strategy. RESULTS: Of the 5979 invitees, 1952 (32.6%) completed the FIT only, 2379 (39.8%) completed both the FIT and FHQ and 95 (1.6%) completed the FHQ only. Addition of the FHQ to FIT-based screening resulted in one extra case of AN detected after 16 additional colonoscopies, resulting in a yield of 19.6 (95% CI, 16.4–23.5) for the combined strategy versus 19.5 (95% CI, 16.3–23.3) for the FIT-only strategy (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an FHQ to one round of FIT screening did not increase the detection of AN compared with FIT only (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698462). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7283285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72832852021-04-20 Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield Roos, Victorine H. Kallenberg, Frank G. J. van der Vlugt, Manon Bongers, Evelien J. C. Aalfs, Cora M. Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Dekker, Evelien Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is suboptimal in detecting advanced neoplasia (AN). To increase the sensitivity and yield of a FIT-based screening programme, FIT could be combined with risk factors for AN. We evaluated the incremental yield of adding a family history questionnaire (FHQ) on colorectal cancer (CRC) and Lynch syndrome-associated tumours to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme. METHODS: Six thousand screen-naive individuals, aged 59–75 years, were invited to complete a FIT (FOB-Gold, cut-off 47 µg Hb/g faeces) and a validated online FHQ. Participants with a positive FIT and/or positive FHQ, confirmed after genetic counselling, were referred for colonoscopy. Yield of detecting AN per 1000 invitees for the combined strategy was compared with the FIT-only strategy. RESULTS: Of the 5979 invitees, 1952 (32.6%) completed the FIT only, 2379 (39.8%) completed both the FIT and FHQ and 95 (1.6%) completed the FHQ only. Addition of the FHQ to FIT-based screening resulted in one extra case of AN detected after 16 additional colonoscopies, resulting in a yield of 19.6 (95% CI, 16.4–23.5) for the combined strategy versus 19.5 (95% CI, 16.3–23.3) for the FIT-only strategy (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of an FHQ to one round of FIT screening did not increase the detection of AN compared with FIT only (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02698462). Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-20 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7283285/ /pubmed/32307443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article Roos, Victorine H. Kallenberg, Frank G. J. van der Vlugt, Manon Bongers, Evelien J. C. Aalfs, Cora M. Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Dekker, Evelien Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield |
title | Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield |
title_full | Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield |
title_fullStr | Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield |
title_full_unstemmed | Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield |
title_short | Addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the Dutch FIT-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield |
title_sort | addition of an online, validated family history questionnaire to the dutch fit-based screening programme did not improve its diagnostic yield |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0832-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roosvictorineh additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield AT kallenbergfrankgj additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield AT vandervlugtmanon additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield AT bongersevelienjc additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield AT aalfscoram additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield AT bossuytpatrickmm additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield AT dekkerevelien additionofanonlinevalidatedfamilyhistoryquestionnairetothedutchfitbasedscreeningprogrammedidnotimproveitsdiagnosticyield |