Cargando…

Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as widely accepted treatment option for small-sized (Koos I up to II) vestibular schwannoma (VS). For larger tumors (prevalent Koos VI), microsurgery or combined treatment strategies are mostly recommended. However, in patients not suited for microsurgery,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rueß, Daniel, Pöhlmann, Lea, Grau, Stefan, Hamisch, Christina, Hoevels, Mauritius, Treuer, Harald, Baues, Christian, Kocher, Martin, Ruge, Maximillian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66213-4
_version_ 1783544309134393344
author Rueß, Daniel
Pöhlmann, Lea
Grau, Stefan
Hamisch, Christina
Hoevels, Mauritius
Treuer, Harald
Baues, Christian
Kocher, Martin
Ruge, Maximillian
author_facet Rueß, Daniel
Pöhlmann, Lea
Grau, Stefan
Hamisch, Christina
Hoevels, Mauritius
Treuer, Harald
Baues, Christian
Kocher, Martin
Ruge, Maximillian
author_sort Rueß, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as widely accepted treatment option for small-sized (Koos I up to II) vestibular schwannoma (VS). For larger tumors (prevalent Koos VI), microsurgery or combined treatment strategies are mostly recommended. However, in patients not suited for microsurgery, SRS might also be an alternative to balance tumor control, hearing preservation and adverse effects. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SRS for VS with regard to different Koos grades. All patients with untreated VS who received SRS at our center were included. Outcome analysis included tumor control, preservation of serviceable hearing based on median pure tone averages (PTA), and procedure-related adverse events rated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; v4.03) classification. In total, 258 patients (median age 58 years, range 21–84) were identified with a mean follow-up of 52 months (range 3–228 months). Mean tumor volume was 1.8 ml (range 0.1–18.5). The mean marginal dose was 12.3 Gy ± 0.6 (range 11–13.5). The cohort was divided into two groups: A (Koos grades I and II, n = 186) and B (Koos grades III and IV, n = 72). The actuarial tumor control rate was 98% after 2 years and 90% after 5 and 10 years. Koos grading did not show a significant impact on tumor control (p = 0.632) or hearing preservation (p = 0.231). After SRS, 18 patients (7%) had new transient or permanent symptoms classified by the CTCAE. The actuarial rate of CTCAE-free survival was not related to Koos grading (p = 0.093). Based on this selected population of Koos grade III and IV VS without or with only mild symptoms from brainstem compression, SRS can be recommended as the primary therapy with the advantage of low morbidity and satisfactory tumor control. The overall hearing preservation rate and toxicity of SRS was influenced by age and cannot be predicted by tumor volume or Koos grading alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7283483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72834832020-06-15 Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system Rueß, Daniel Pöhlmann, Lea Grau, Stefan Hamisch, Christina Hoevels, Mauritius Treuer, Harald Baues, Christian Kocher, Martin Ruge, Maximillian Sci Rep Article Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as widely accepted treatment option for small-sized (Koos I up to II) vestibular schwannoma (VS). For larger tumors (prevalent Koos VI), microsurgery or combined treatment strategies are mostly recommended. However, in patients not suited for microsurgery, SRS might also be an alternative to balance tumor control, hearing preservation and adverse effects. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SRS for VS with regard to different Koos grades. All patients with untreated VS who received SRS at our center were included. Outcome analysis included tumor control, preservation of serviceable hearing based on median pure tone averages (PTA), and procedure-related adverse events rated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; v4.03) classification. In total, 258 patients (median age 58 years, range 21–84) were identified with a mean follow-up of 52 months (range 3–228 months). Mean tumor volume was 1.8 ml (range 0.1–18.5). The mean marginal dose was 12.3 Gy ± 0.6 (range 11–13.5). The cohort was divided into two groups: A (Koos grades I and II, n = 186) and B (Koos grades III and IV, n = 72). The actuarial tumor control rate was 98% after 2 years and 90% after 5 and 10 years. Koos grading did not show a significant impact on tumor control (p = 0.632) or hearing preservation (p = 0.231). After SRS, 18 patients (7%) had new transient or permanent symptoms classified by the CTCAE. The actuarial rate of CTCAE-free survival was not related to Koos grading (p = 0.093). Based on this selected population of Koos grade III and IV VS without or with only mild symptoms from brainstem compression, SRS can be recommended as the primary therapy with the advantage of low morbidity and satisfactory tumor control. The overall hearing preservation rate and toxicity of SRS was influenced by age and cannot be predicted by tumor volume or Koos grading alone. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7283483/ /pubmed/32518238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66213-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rueß, Daniel
Pöhlmann, Lea
Grau, Stefan
Hamisch, Christina
Hoevels, Mauritius
Treuer, Harald
Baues, Christian
Kocher, Martin
Ruge, Maximillian
Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system
title Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system
title_full Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system
title_fullStr Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system
title_full_unstemmed Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system
title_short Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system
title_sort outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the koos grading system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32518238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66213-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rueßdaniel outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT pohlmannlea outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT graustefan outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT hamischchristina outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT hoevelsmauritius outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT treuerharald outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT baueschristian outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT kochermartin outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem
AT rugemaximillian outcomeandtoxicityanalysisofsingledosestereotacticradiosurgeryinvestibularschwannomabasedonthekoosgradingsystem