Cargando…

Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of 10 patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, patients with symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears were prospectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badman, Brian L., Baessler, Aaron M., Moor, Molly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.006
_version_ 1783544362349625344
author Badman, Brian L.
Baessler, Aaron M.
Moor, Molly
author_facet Badman, Brian L.
Baessler, Aaron M.
Moor, Molly
author_sort Badman, Brian L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of 10 patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, patients with symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled for treatment with arthroscopic SCR. Investigational review board approval was achieved. All patients were treated by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Range of motion and functional outcome according to visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were assessed preoperatively and at routine follow-up intervals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound were obtained at a minimum of 1 year to assess graft integrity and to correlate clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 58.6 years had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. In all patients, preoperatively to postoperatively, mean forward flexion improved from 141° to 173° (P = .018), mean visual analog scale pain score decreased from 6.5 to 1 (P = .004), and mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 43 to 87 (P = .005). At 1 year, ultrasound evaluation identified graft failure in 1 patient (10%), whereas MRI diagnosed graft failure in 7 patients (70%). Of the 7 failures diagnosed by MRI, 4 failed at the level of the glenoid, 2 failed mid-graft, and 1 failed at the humerus. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical outcomes are statistically improved following arthroscopic SCR using a dermal allograft, the early high failure rates of the graft raise concerns about the long-term outcomes of the procedure. Furthermore, the use of ultrasound alone to validate an intact graft should be used with caution, as failures can occur at the glenoid and can be missed without MRI correlation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic case series
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7283935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72839352020-06-15 Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Badman, Brian L. Baessler, Aaron M. Moor, Molly Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of 10 patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using dermal allograft. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, patients with symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled for treatment with arthroscopic SCR. Investigational review board approval was achieved. All patients were treated by a single fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Range of motion and functional outcome according to visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were assessed preoperatively and at routine follow-up intervals. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound were obtained at a minimum of 1 year to assess graft integrity and to correlate clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ten patients with a mean age of 58.6 years had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. In all patients, preoperatively to postoperatively, mean forward flexion improved from 141° to 173° (P = .018), mean visual analog scale pain score decreased from 6.5 to 1 (P = .004), and mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 43 to 87 (P = .005). At 1 year, ultrasound evaluation identified graft failure in 1 patient (10%), whereas MRI diagnosed graft failure in 7 patients (70%). Of the 7 failures diagnosed by MRI, 4 failed at the level of the glenoid, 2 failed mid-graft, and 1 failed at the humerus. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical outcomes are statistically improved following arthroscopic SCR using a dermal allograft, the early high failure rates of the graft raise concerns about the long-term outcomes of the procedure. Furthermore, the use of ultrasound alone to validate an intact graft should be used with caution, as failures can occur at the glenoid and can be missed without MRI correlation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic case series Elsevier 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7283935/ /pubmed/32548588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.006 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Badman, Brian L.
Baessler, Aaron M.
Moor, Molly
Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction
title Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction
title_full Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction
title_fullStr Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction
title_short Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Superior Capsular Reconstruction
title_sort short-term clinical outcomes and comparison of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging of superior capsular reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7283935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.006
work_keys_str_mv AT badmanbrianl shorttermclinicaloutcomesandcomparisonofultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimagingofsuperiorcapsularreconstruction
AT baessleraaronm shorttermclinicaloutcomesandcomparisonofultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimagingofsuperiorcapsularreconstruction
AT moormolly shorttermclinicaloutcomesandcomparisonofultrasoundversusmagneticresonanceimagingofsuperiorcapsularreconstruction