Cargando…
Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression
Flowering is the most favorable host stage for Fusarium infection in wheat, which is called the susceptibility window (SW). It is not known how long it takes, how it changes in different resistance classes, nor how stable is the plant reaction in the SW. We have no information, how the traits diseas...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050627 |
_version_ | 1783544452008116224 |
---|---|
author | György, Andrea Tóth, Beata Varga, Monika Mesterhazy, Akos |
author_facet | György, Andrea Tóth, Beata Varga, Monika Mesterhazy, Akos |
author_sort | György, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flowering is the most favorable host stage for Fusarium infection in wheat, which is called the susceptibility window (SW). It is not known how long it takes, how it changes in different resistance classes, nor how stable is the plant reaction in the SW. We have no information, how the traits disease index (DI), Fusarium-damaged kernel rate (FDK), and deoxynivalenol (DON) respond within the 16 days period. Seven winter wheat genotypes differing in resistance were tested (2013–2014). Four Fusarium isolates were used for inoculation at mid-anthesis, and 4, 8, 11, 13, and 16 days thereafter. The DI was not suitable to determine the length of the SW. In the Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK), a sharp 50% decrease was found after the 8th day. The largest reduction (above 60%) was recorded for DON at each resistance level between the 8th and 11th day. This trait showed the SW most precisely. The SW is reasonably stable in the first 8–9 days. This fits for all resistance classes. The use of four isolates significantly improved the reliability and credit of the testing. The stable eight-day long SW helps to reduce the number of inoculations. The most important trait to determine the SW is the DON reaction and not the visual symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7284375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72843752020-08-13 Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression György, Andrea Tóth, Beata Varga, Monika Mesterhazy, Akos Microorganisms Article Flowering is the most favorable host stage for Fusarium infection in wheat, which is called the susceptibility window (SW). It is not known how long it takes, how it changes in different resistance classes, nor how stable is the plant reaction in the SW. We have no information, how the traits disease index (DI), Fusarium-damaged kernel rate (FDK), and deoxynivalenol (DON) respond within the 16 days period. Seven winter wheat genotypes differing in resistance were tested (2013–2014). Four Fusarium isolates were used for inoculation at mid-anthesis, and 4, 8, 11, 13, and 16 days thereafter. The DI was not suitable to determine the length of the SW. In the Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK), a sharp 50% decrease was found after the 8th day. The largest reduction (above 60%) was recorded for DON at each resistance level between the 8th and 11th day. This trait showed the SW most precisely. The SW is reasonably stable in the first 8–9 days. This fits for all resistance classes. The use of four isolates significantly improved the reliability and credit of the testing. The stable eight-day long SW helps to reduce the number of inoculations. The most important trait to determine the SW is the DON reaction and not the visual symptoms. MDPI 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7284375/ /pubmed/32344937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050627 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article György, Andrea Tóth, Beata Varga, Monika Mesterhazy, Akos Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression |
title | Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression |
title_full | Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression |
title_fullStr | Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression |
title_short | Methodical Considerations and Resistance Evaluation against Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Head Blight in Wheat. Part 3. Susceptibility Window and Resistance Expression |
title_sort | methodical considerations and resistance evaluation against fusarium graminearum and f. culmorum head blight in wheat. part 3. susceptibility window and resistance expression |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32344937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gyorgyandrea methodicalconsiderationsandresistanceevaluationagainstfusariumgraminearumandfculmorumheadblightinwheatpart3susceptibilitywindowandresistanceexpression AT tothbeata methodicalconsiderationsandresistanceevaluationagainstfusariumgraminearumandfculmorumheadblightinwheatpart3susceptibilitywindowandresistanceexpression AT vargamonika methodicalconsiderationsandresistanceevaluationagainstfusariumgraminearumandfculmorumheadblightinwheatpart3susceptibilitywindowandresistanceexpression AT mesterhazyakos methodicalconsiderationsandresistanceevaluationagainstfusariumgraminearumandfculmorumheadblightinwheatpart3susceptibilitywindowandresistanceexpression |