Cargando…

Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response

Purpose: To compare the change in serum carotenoids, macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and visual function with the intake of two commercially available nutritional supplements. Methods: Participants were given a 24-week supply of a lipid-based micronized liquid medical food, Lumega-Z™ (LM), co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bone, Richard A., Davey, Pinakin Gunvant, Roman, Betzabe O., Evans, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051321
_version_ 1783544505365954560
author Bone, Richard A.
Davey, Pinakin Gunvant
Roman, Betzabe O.
Evans, David W.
author_facet Bone, Richard A.
Davey, Pinakin Gunvant
Roman, Betzabe O.
Evans, David W.
author_sort Bone, Richard A.
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare the change in serum carotenoids, macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and visual function with the intake of two commercially available nutritional supplements. Methods: Participants were given a 24-week supply of a lipid-based micronized liquid medical food, Lumega-Z™ (LM), containing 28 mg of the macular carotenoids lutein (L), zeaxanthin (Z) and meso-zeaxanthin (MZ), or given PreserVision™ AREDS 2 Formula (gel-caps; PV) containing 12 mg of the macular carotenoids L and Z, but no reported MZ. Serum levels of L, Z and MZ were obtained at baseline and after 12 weeks. Macular pigment optical densities (MPOD) and visual function were assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks. Results: Average blood serum concentrations of L, Z and MZ in the two groups at baseline were similar. The increases in L, Z and MZ were 0.434, 0.063 and 0.086 µmol/L vs. 0.100, 0.043 and 0.001 µmol/L, respectively, in the LM vs. PV group. From baseline to week 24, average MPOD in the LM-group increased by 0.064 from 0.418 to 0.482, whereas in the PV-group, it was essentially unchanged (0.461 to 0.459;). Although log-contrast sensitivity was improved in all groups under three conditions (photopic, mesopic and mesopic with glare), the change in log-contrast sensitivity was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Despite only a 2.3-fold higher carotenoid concentration than PV, LM supplementation provides approximately 3–4-fold higher absorption, which leads to a significant elevation of MPOD levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7284601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72846012020-06-19 Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response Bone, Richard A. Davey, Pinakin Gunvant Roman, Betzabe O. Evans, David W. Nutrients Article Purpose: To compare the change in serum carotenoids, macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and visual function with the intake of two commercially available nutritional supplements. Methods: Participants were given a 24-week supply of a lipid-based micronized liquid medical food, Lumega-Z™ (LM), containing 28 mg of the macular carotenoids lutein (L), zeaxanthin (Z) and meso-zeaxanthin (MZ), or given PreserVision™ AREDS 2 Formula (gel-caps; PV) containing 12 mg of the macular carotenoids L and Z, but no reported MZ. Serum levels of L, Z and MZ were obtained at baseline and after 12 weeks. Macular pigment optical densities (MPOD) and visual function were assessed at baseline and after 24 weeks. Results: Average blood serum concentrations of L, Z and MZ in the two groups at baseline were similar. The increases in L, Z and MZ were 0.434, 0.063 and 0.086 µmol/L vs. 0.100, 0.043 and 0.001 µmol/L, respectively, in the LM vs. PV group. From baseline to week 24, average MPOD in the LM-group increased by 0.064 from 0.418 to 0.482, whereas in the PV-group, it was essentially unchanged (0.461 to 0.459;). Although log-contrast sensitivity was improved in all groups under three conditions (photopic, mesopic and mesopic with glare), the change in log-contrast sensitivity was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Despite only a 2.3-fold higher carotenoid concentration than PV, LM supplementation provides approximately 3–4-fold higher absorption, which leads to a significant elevation of MPOD levels. MDPI 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7284601/ /pubmed/32384663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051321 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bone, Richard A.
Davey, Pinakin Gunvant
Roman, Betzabe O.
Evans, David W.
Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response
title Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response
title_full Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response
title_fullStr Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response
title_short Efficacy of Commercially Available Nutritional Supplements: Analysis of Serum Uptake, Macular Pigment Optical Density and Visual Functional Response
title_sort efficacy of commercially available nutritional supplements: analysis of serum uptake, macular pigment optical density and visual functional response
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12051321
work_keys_str_mv AT bonericharda efficacyofcommerciallyavailablenutritionalsupplementsanalysisofserumuptakemacularpigmentopticaldensityandvisualfunctionalresponse
AT daveypinakingunvant efficacyofcommerciallyavailablenutritionalsupplementsanalysisofserumuptakemacularpigmentopticaldensityandvisualfunctionalresponse
AT romanbetzabeo efficacyofcommerciallyavailablenutritionalsupplementsanalysisofserumuptakemacularpigmentopticaldensityandvisualfunctionalresponse
AT evansdavidw efficacyofcommerciallyavailablenutritionalsupplementsanalysisofserumuptakemacularpigmentopticaldensityandvisualfunctionalresponse