Cargando…
The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This review aimed to systematically compare microbial profiles of peri-implantitis to those of periodontitis and healthy implants. Therefore, an electronic search in five databases was conducted. For inclusion, studies assessing the microbiome of peri-implantitis in otherwise healthy patients were c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050661 |
_version_ | 1783544575181193216 |
---|---|
author | Sahrmann, Philipp Gilli, Fabienne Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Attin, Thomas Schmidlin, Patrick R. Karygianni, Lamprini |
author_facet | Sahrmann, Philipp Gilli, Fabienne Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Attin, Thomas Schmidlin, Patrick R. Karygianni, Lamprini |
author_sort | Sahrmann, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review aimed to systematically compare microbial profiles of peri-implantitis to those of periodontitis and healthy implants. Therefore, an electronic search in five databases was conducted. For inclusion, studies assessing the microbiome of peri-implantitis in otherwise healthy patients were considered. Literature was assessed for consistent evidence of exclusive or predominant peri-implantitis microbiota. Of 158 potentially eligible articles, data of 64 studies on 3730 samples from peri-implant sites were included in this study. Different assessment methods were described in the studies, namely bacterial culture, PCR-based assessment, hybridization techniques, pyrosequencing, and transcriptomic analyses. After analysis of 13 selected culture-dependent studies, no microbial species were found to be specific for peri-implantitis. After assessment of 28 studies using PCR-based methods and a meta-analysis on 19 studies, a higher prevalence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia (log-odds ratio 4.04 and 2.28, respectively) was detected in peri-implantitis biofilms compared with healthy implants. Actinomyces spp., Porphyromonas spp. and Rothia spp. were found in all five pyrosequencing studies in healthy-, periodontitis-, and peri-implantitis samples. In conclusion, the body of evidence does not show a consistent specific profile. Future studies should focus on the assessment of sites with different diagnosis for the same patient, and investigate the complex host-biofilm interaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7284896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72848962020-06-17 The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sahrmann, Philipp Gilli, Fabienne Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Attin, Thomas Schmidlin, Patrick R. Karygianni, Lamprini Microorganisms Review This review aimed to systematically compare microbial profiles of peri-implantitis to those of periodontitis and healthy implants. Therefore, an electronic search in five databases was conducted. For inclusion, studies assessing the microbiome of peri-implantitis in otherwise healthy patients were considered. Literature was assessed for consistent evidence of exclusive or predominant peri-implantitis microbiota. Of 158 potentially eligible articles, data of 64 studies on 3730 samples from peri-implant sites were included in this study. Different assessment methods were described in the studies, namely bacterial culture, PCR-based assessment, hybridization techniques, pyrosequencing, and transcriptomic analyses. After analysis of 13 selected culture-dependent studies, no microbial species were found to be specific for peri-implantitis. After assessment of 28 studies using PCR-based methods and a meta-analysis on 19 studies, a higher prevalence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia (log-odds ratio 4.04 and 2.28, respectively) was detected in peri-implantitis biofilms compared with healthy implants. Actinomyces spp., Porphyromonas spp. and Rothia spp. were found in all five pyrosequencing studies in healthy-, periodontitis-, and peri-implantitis samples. In conclusion, the body of evidence does not show a consistent specific profile. Future studies should focus on the assessment of sites with different diagnosis for the same patient, and investigate the complex host-biofilm interaction. MDPI 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7284896/ /pubmed/32369987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050661 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Sahrmann, Philipp Gilli, Fabienne Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Attin, Thomas Schmidlin, Patrick R. Karygianni, Lamprini The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | microbiome of peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahrmannphilipp themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gillifabienne themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wiedemeierdanielb themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT attinthomas themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT schmidlinpatrickr themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT karygiannilamprini themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sahrmannphilipp microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gillifabienne microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wiedemeierdanielb microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT attinthomas microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT schmidlinpatrickr microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT karygiannilamprini microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |