Cargando…

The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review aimed to systematically compare microbial profiles of peri-implantitis to those of periodontitis and healthy implants. Therefore, an electronic search in five databases was conducted. For inclusion, studies assessing the microbiome of peri-implantitis in otherwise healthy patients were c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahrmann, Philipp, Gilli, Fabienne, Wiedemeier, Daniel B., Attin, Thomas, Schmidlin, Patrick R., Karygianni, Lamprini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369987
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050661
_version_ 1783544575181193216
author Sahrmann, Philipp
Gilli, Fabienne
Wiedemeier, Daniel B.
Attin, Thomas
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Karygianni, Lamprini
author_facet Sahrmann, Philipp
Gilli, Fabienne
Wiedemeier, Daniel B.
Attin, Thomas
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Karygianni, Lamprini
author_sort Sahrmann, Philipp
collection PubMed
description This review aimed to systematically compare microbial profiles of peri-implantitis to those of periodontitis and healthy implants. Therefore, an electronic search in five databases was conducted. For inclusion, studies assessing the microbiome of peri-implantitis in otherwise healthy patients were considered. Literature was assessed for consistent evidence of exclusive or predominant peri-implantitis microbiota. Of 158 potentially eligible articles, data of 64 studies on 3730 samples from peri-implant sites were included in this study. Different assessment methods were described in the studies, namely bacterial culture, PCR-based assessment, hybridization techniques, pyrosequencing, and transcriptomic analyses. After analysis of 13 selected culture-dependent studies, no microbial species were found to be specific for peri-implantitis. After assessment of 28 studies using PCR-based methods and a meta-analysis on 19 studies, a higher prevalence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia (log-odds ratio 4.04 and 2.28, respectively) was detected in peri-implantitis biofilms compared with healthy implants. Actinomyces spp., Porphyromonas spp. and Rothia spp. were found in all five pyrosequencing studies in healthy-, periodontitis-, and peri-implantitis samples. In conclusion, the body of evidence does not show a consistent specific profile. Future studies should focus on the assessment of sites with different diagnosis for the same patient, and investigate the complex host-biofilm interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7284896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72848962020-06-17 The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sahrmann, Philipp Gilli, Fabienne Wiedemeier, Daniel B. Attin, Thomas Schmidlin, Patrick R. Karygianni, Lamprini Microorganisms Review This review aimed to systematically compare microbial profiles of peri-implantitis to those of periodontitis and healthy implants. Therefore, an electronic search in five databases was conducted. For inclusion, studies assessing the microbiome of peri-implantitis in otherwise healthy patients were considered. Literature was assessed for consistent evidence of exclusive or predominant peri-implantitis microbiota. Of 158 potentially eligible articles, data of 64 studies on 3730 samples from peri-implant sites were included in this study. Different assessment methods were described in the studies, namely bacterial culture, PCR-based assessment, hybridization techniques, pyrosequencing, and transcriptomic analyses. After analysis of 13 selected culture-dependent studies, no microbial species were found to be specific for peri-implantitis. After assessment of 28 studies using PCR-based methods and a meta-analysis on 19 studies, a higher prevalence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia (log-odds ratio 4.04 and 2.28, respectively) was detected in peri-implantitis biofilms compared with healthy implants. Actinomyces spp., Porphyromonas spp. and Rothia spp. were found in all five pyrosequencing studies in healthy-, periodontitis-, and peri-implantitis samples. In conclusion, the body of evidence does not show a consistent specific profile. Future studies should focus on the assessment of sites with different diagnosis for the same patient, and investigate the complex host-biofilm interaction. MDPI 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7284896/ /pubmed/32369987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050661 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sahrmann, Philipp
Gilli, Fabienne
Wiedemeier, Daniel B.
Attin, Thomas
Schmidlin, Patrick R.
Karygianni, Lamprini
The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort microbiome of peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7284896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369987
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050661
work_keys_str_mv AT sahrmannphilipp themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gillifabienne themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wiedemeierdanielb themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT attinthomas themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schmidlinpatrickr themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT karygiannilamprini themicrobiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sahrmannphilipp microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gillifabienne microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wiedemeierdanielb microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT attinthomas microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schmidlinpatrickr microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT karygiannilamprini microbiomeofperiimplantitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis