Cargando…

Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know?

INTRODUCTION: Nonpuerperal uterine inversion (NPUI) is a rare clinical problem with diagnostic and surgical challenges. The objective of our study was to review the literature on NPUI and describe causative pathologies, diagnosis, and different surgical options available for treatment. MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herath, R. P., Patabendige, M., Rashid, M., Wijesinghe, P. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8625186
_version_ 1783544655896379392
author Herath, R. P.
Patabendige, M.
Rashid, M.
Wijesinghe, P. S.
author_facet Herath, R. P.
Patabendige, M.
Rashid, M.
Wijesinghe, P. S.
author_sort Herath, R. P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nonpuerperal uterine inversion (NPUI) is a rare clinical problem with diagnostic and surgical challenges. The objective of our study was to review the literature on NPUI and describe causative pathologies, diagnosis, and different surgical options available for treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was carried out on MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases to look for NPUI using the term “non-puerperal uterine inversion,” and further went through the cross-references of the published articles. Data are published case reports from 1911 to September 2018. Of the 153 published cases, 133 reports had adequate details of surgery for analysis. These reports were analyzed, concerning the clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, and surgical treatment. RESULTS: Mean age of the women was 46.3 years (standard deviation: 18, N = 153). Leiomyoma remained the commonest (56.2%) aetiology. While malignancies contributed to 32.02% of cases, 9.2% were idiopathic. High degree of clinical suspicion and identification of unique features on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging enable prompt diagnosis. In cases of uncertainty, laparoscopy or biopsy of the mass was used to confirm the diagnosis. Hysterectomy or repositioning and repair of the uterus are the only treatment options available. The surgical methods implemented were analyzed in three aspects: route of surgical access, method of repositioning, and final surgical procedure undertaken. The majority (48.8%) had only abdominal access, while 27.1% had both abdominal and vaginal access. Haultain procedure was the most useful procedure for reposition (18.0%) of the uterus. The majority (39.7%) required abdominal hysterectomy with or without debulking of the tumour abdominally, while 15.0% had uterine repair after repositioning. We reviewed the different surgical techniques and described and proposed a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Fibroids were the commonest cause for NPUI. Malignancies accounted for one-third of cases. A combined abdominal and vaginal approach, followed by hysterectomy or repair after repositioning, seems to be better for nonmalignant cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7285247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72852472020-06-18 Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know? Herath, R. P. Patabendige, M. Rashid, M. Wijesinghe, P. S. Obstet Gynecol Int Review Article INTRODUCTION: Nonpuerperal uterine inversion (NPUI) is a rare clinical problem with diagnostic and surgical challenges. The objective of our study was to review the literature on NPUI and describe causative pathologies, diagnosis, and different surgical options available for treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was carried out on MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases to look for NPUI using the term “non-puerperal uterine inversion,” and further went through the cross-references of the published articles. Data are published case reports from 1911 to September 2018. Of the 153 published cases, 133 reports had adequate details of surgery for analysis. These reports were analyzed, concerning the clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, and surgical treatment. RESULTS: Mean age of the women was 46.3 years (standard deviation: 18, N = 153). Leiomyoma remained the commonest (56.2%) aetiology. While malignancies contributed to 32.02% of cases, 9.2% were idiopathic. High degree of clinical suspicion and identification of unique features on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging enable prompt diagnosis. In cases of uncertainty, laparoscopy or biopsy of the mass was used to confirm the diagnosis. Hysterectomy or repositioning and repair of the uterus are the only treatment options available. The surgical methods implemented were analyzed in three aspects: route of surgical access, method of repositioning, and final surgical procedure undertaken. The majority (48.8%) had only abdominal access, while 27.1% had both abdominal and vaginal access. Haultain procedure was the most useful procedure for reposition (18.0%) of the uterus. The majority (39.7%) required abdominal hysterectomy with or without debulking of the tumour abdominally, while 15.0% had uterine repair after repositioning. We reviewed the different surgical techniques and described and proposed a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Fibroids were the commonest cause for NPUI. Malignancies accounted for one-third of cases. A combined abdominal and vaginal approach, followed by hysterectomy or repair after repositioning, seems to be better for nonmalignant cases. Hindawi 2020-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7285247/ /pubmed/32565821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8625186 Text en Copyright © 2020 R. P. Herath et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Herath, R. P.
Patabendige, M.
Rashid, M.
Wijesinghe, P. S.
Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know?
title Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know?
title_full Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know?
title_fullStr Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know?
title_full_unstemmed Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know?
title_short Nonpuerperal Uterine Inversion: What the Gynaecologists Need to Know?
title_sort nonpuerperal uterine inversion: what the gynaecologists need to know?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8625186
work_keys_str_mv AT herathrp nonpuerperaluterineinversionwhatthegynaecologistsneedtoknow
AT patabendigem nonpuerperaluterineinversionwhatthegynaecologistsneedtoknow
AT rashidm nonpuerperaluterineinversionwhatthegynaecologistsneedtoknow
AT wijesingheps nonpuerperaluterineinversionwhatthegynaecologistsneedtoknow