Cargando…
Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis
AIM: In this paper, we aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction method using independent prognosis genes selected robustly in prostate cancer. METHOD: We considered 723 samples obtained from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas), GSE46602, and GSE21032. Prostate cancer prognosis-related genes with P...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1097602 |
_version_ | 1783544688787062784 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yutao Lin, Jiaxing Yan, Kexin Wang, Jianfeng |
author_facet | Wang, Yutao Lin, Jiaxing Yan, Kexin Wang, Jianfeng |
author_sort | Wang, Yutao |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: In this paper, we aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction method using independent prognosis genes selected robustly in prostate cancer. METHOD: We considered 723 samples obtained from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas), GSE46602, and GSE21032. Prostate cancer prognosis-related genes with P < 0.05 were selected using Univariable Cox regression analysis. We then built the lowest AIC (Akaike information criterion score) optimal gene model using the “Rbsurv” package in TCGA train set. The coefficients were obtained by Multivariable Cox regression analysis. We named the new prognosis method CMU5. The CMU5 risk score was verified in TCGA test set, GSE46602, and GSE21032. RESULTS: FAM72D, ARHGAP33, TACR2, PLEK2, and FA2H were identified as independent prognosis factors in prostate cancer patients. We built the computing model as follows: CMU5 risk score = 1.158∗FAM72D + 1.737∗ARHGAP33 − 0.737∗TACR2 − 0.651∗PLEK2 − 0.793∗FA2H. The AUC of DFS was 0.809 in the train set (274 samples), 0.710 in the test set (273 samples), and 0.768 in the complete set (547 samples). The benign prediction capacity of CMU5 was verified by GSE46602 (36 samples; AUC = 0.6039) and GSE21032 GPL5188 (140 samples; AUC = 0.7083). Using the cut-off point of 2.056, a significant difference was shown between high- and low-risk groups. CONCLUSION: A prognosis-related risk score formula named CMU5 was built and verified, providing reliable prediction of prostate cancer outcome. This signature might provide a basis for individualized treatment of prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7285394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72853942020-06-20 Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis Wang, Yutao Lin, Jiaxing Yan, Kexin Wang, Jianfeng Int J Genomics Research Article AIM: In this paper, we aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction method using independent prognosis genes selected robustly in prostate cancer. METHOD: We considered 723 samples obtained from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas), GSE46602, and GSE21032. Prostate cancer prognosis-related genes with P < 0.05 were selected using Univariable Cox regression analysis. We then built the lowest AIC (Akaike information criterion score) optimal gene model using the “Rbsurv” package in TCGA train set. The coefficients were obtained by Multivariable Cox regression analysis. We named the new prognosis method CMU5. The CMU5 risk score was verified in TCGA test set, GSE46602, and GSE21032. RESULTS: FAM72D, ARHGAP33, TACR2, PLEK2, and FA2H were identified as independent prognosis factors in prostate cancer patients. We built the computing model as follows: CMU5 risk score = 1.158∗FAM72D + 1.737∗ARHGAP33 − 0.737∗TACR2 − 0.651∗PLEK2 − 0.793∗FA2H. The AUC of DFS was 0.809 in the train set (274 samples), 0.710 in the test set (273 samples), and 0.768 in the complete set (547 samples). The benign prediction capacity of CMU5 was verified by GSE46602 (36 samples; AUC = 0.6039) and GSE21032 GPL5188 (140 samples; AUC = 0.7083). Using the cut-off point of 2.056, a significant difference was shown between high- and low-risk groups. CONCLUSION: A prognosis-related risk score formula named CMU5 was built and verified, providing reliable prediction of prostate cancer outcome. This signature might provide a basis for individualized treatment of prostate cancer. Hindawi 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7285394/ /pubmed/32566639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1097602 Text en Copyright © 2020 Yutao Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Yutao Lin, Jiaxing Yan, Kexin Wang, Jianfeng Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis |
title | Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis |
title_full | Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis |
title_fullStr | Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis |
title_short | Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis |
title_sort | identification of a robust five-gene risk model in prostate cancer: a robust likelihood-based survival analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1097602 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyutao identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis AT linjiaxing identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis AT yankexin identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis AT wangjianfeng identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis |