Cargando…

Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis

AIM: In this paper, we aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction method using independent prognosis genes selected robustly in prostate cancer. METHOD: We considered 723 samples obtained from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas), GSE46602, and GSE21032. Prostate cancer prognosis-related genes with P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yutao, Lin, Jiaxing, Yan, Kexin, Wang, Jianfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1097602
_version_ 1783544688787062784
author Wang, Yutao
Lin, Jiaxing
Yan, Kexin
Wang, Jianfeng
author_facet Wang, Yutao
Lin, Jiaxing
Yan, Kexin
Wang, Jianfeng
author_sort Wang, Yutao
collection PubMed
description AIM: In this paper, we aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction method using independent prognosis genes selected robustly in prostate cancer. METHOD: We considered 723 samples obtained from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas), GSE46602, and GSE21032. Prostate cancer prognosis-related genes with P < 0.05 were selected using Univariable Cox regression analysis. We then built the lowest AIC (Akaike information criterion score) optimal gene model using the “Rbsurv” package in TCGA train set. The coefficients were obtained by Multivariable Cox regression analysis. We named the new prognosis method CMU5. The CMU5 risk score was verified in TCGA test set, GSE46602, and GSE21032. RESULTS: FAM72D, ARHGAP33, TACR2, PLEK2, and FA2H were identified as independent prognosis factors in prostate cancer patients. We built the computing model as follows: CMU5 risk score = 1.158∗FAM72D + 1.737∗ARHGAP33 − 0.737∗TACR2 − 0.651∗PLEK2 − 0.793∗FA2H. The AUC of DFS was 0.809 in the train set (274 samples), 0.710 in the test set (273 samples), and 0.768 in the complete set (547 samples). The benign prediction capacity of CMU5 was verified by GSE46602 (36 samples; AUC = 0.6039) and GSE21032 GPL5188 (140 samples; AUC = 0.7083). Using the cut-off point of 2.056, a significant difference was shown between high- and low-risk groups. CONCLUSION: A prognosis-related risk score formula named CMU5 was built and verified, providing reliable prediction of prostate cancer outcome. This signature might provide a basis for individualized treatment of prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7285394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72853942020-06-20 Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis Wang, Yutao Lin, Jiaxing Yan, Kexin Wang, Jianfeng Int J Genomics Research Article AIM: In this paper, we aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction method using independent prognosis genes selected robustly in prostate cancer. METHOD: We considered 723 samples obtained from TCGA (the Cancer Genome Atlas), GSE46602, and GSE21032. Prostate cancer prognosis-related genes with P < 0.05 were selected using Univariable Cox regression analysis. We then built the lowest AIC (Akaike information criterion score) optimal gene model using the “Rbsurv” package in TCGA train set. The coefficients were obtained by Multivariable Cox regression analysis. We named the new prognosis method CMU5. The CMU5 risk score was verified in TCGA test set, GSE46602, and GSE21032. RESULTS: FAM72D, ARHGAP33, TACR2, PLEK2, and FA2H were identified as independent prognosis factors in prostate cancer patients. We built the computing model as follows: CMU5 risk score = 1.158∗FAM72D + 1.737∗ARHGAP33 − 0.737∗TACR2 − 0.651∗PLEK2 − 0.793∗FA2H. The AUC of DFS was 0.809 in the train set (274 samples), 0.710 in the test set (273 samples), and 0.768 in the complete set (547 samples). The benign prediction capacity of CMU5 was verified by GSE46602 (36 samples; AUC = 0.6039) and GSE21032 GPL5188 (140 samples; AUC = 0.7083). Using the cut-off point of 2.056, a significant difference was shown between high- and low-risk groups. CONCLUSION: A prognosis-related risk score formula named CMU5 was built and verified, providing reliable prediction of prostate cancer outcome. This signature might provide a basis for individualized treatment of prostate cancer. Hindawi 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7285394/ /pubmed/32566639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1097602 Text en Copyright © 2020 Yutao Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yutao
Lin, Jiaxing
Yan, Kexin
Wang, Jianfeng
Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis
title Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis
title_full Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis
title_fullStr Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis
title_short Identification of a Robust Five-Gene Risk Model in Prostate Cancer: A Robust Likelihood-Based Survival Analysis
title_sort identification of a robust five-gene risk model in prostate cancer: a robust likelihood-based survival analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1097602
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyutao identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis
AT linjiaxing identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis
AT yankexin identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis
AT wangjianfeng identificationofarobustfivegeneriskmodelinprostatecancerarobustlikelihoodbasedsurvivalanalysis