Cargando…
PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma
Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986 |
_version_ | 1783544690639896576 |
---|---|
author | Parkes, Amanda Urquiola, Elizabeth Bhosale, Priya Lin, Heather Watson, Kelsey Wang, Wei-Lien Feig, Barry Torres, Keila Roland, Christina L. Conley, Anthony P. Zarzour, Maria Livingston, J. Andrew Ratan, Ravin Ludwig, Joseph Araujo, Dejka M. Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Patel, Shreyaskumar Somaiah, Neeta |
author_facet | Parkes, Amanda Urquiola, Elizabeth Bhosale, Priya Lin, Heather Watson, Kelsey Wang, Wei-Lien Feig, Barry Torres, Keila Roland, Christina L. Conley, Anthony P. Zarzour, Maria Livingston, J. Andrew Ratan, Ravin Ludwig, Joseph Araujo, Dejka M. Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Patel, Shreyaskumar Somaiah, Neeta |
author_sort | Parkes, Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (p value = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7285404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72854042020-06-19 PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Parkes, Amanda Urquiola, Elizabeth Bhosale, Priya Lin, Heather Watson, Kelsey Wang, Wei-Lien Feig, Barry Torres, Keila Roland, Christina L. Conley, Anthony P. Zarzour, Maria Livingston, J. Andrew Ratan, Ravin Ludwig, Joseph Araujo, Dejka M. Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Patel, Shreyaskumar Somaiah, Neeta Sarcoma Research Article Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (p value = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor. Hindawi 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7285404/ /pubmed/32565716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986 Text en Copyright © 2020 Amanda Parkes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parkes, Amanda Urquiola, Elizabeth Bhosale, Priya Lin, Heather Watson, Kelsey Wang, Wei-Lien Feig, Barry Torres, Keila Roland, Christina L. Conley, Anthony P. Zarzour, Maria Livingston, J. Andrew Ratan, Ravin Ludwig, Joseph Araujo, Dejka M. Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Patel, Shreyaskumar Somaiah, Neeta PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma |
title | PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma |
title_full | PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma |
title_fullStr | PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma |
title_full_unstemmed | PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma |
title_short | PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma |
title_sort | pet/ct imaging as a diagnostic tool in distinguishing well-differentiated versus dedifferentiated liposarcoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkesamanda petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT urquiolaelizabeth petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT bhosalepriya petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT linheather petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT watsonkelsey petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT wangweilien petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT feigbarry petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT torreskeila petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT rolandchristinal petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT conleyanthonyp petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT zarzourmaria petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT livingstonjandrew petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT ratanravin petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT ludwigjoseph petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT araujodejkam petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT ravivinod petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT benjaminroberts petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT patelshreyaskumar petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma AT somaiahneeta petctimagingasadiagnostictoolindistinguishingwelldifferentiatedversusdedifferentiatedliposarcoma |