Cargando…
Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection
BACKGROUND: Safe and effective non-surgical treatments are an important part of the knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment algorithm. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are two commonly used modalities to manage symptoms associated with knee OA. METHODS: A prospect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03380-5 |
_version_ | 1783544719310061568 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Antonia F. Khalouf, Fred Zora, Keith DePalma, Michael Kohan, Lynn Guirguis, Maged Beall, Douglas Loudermilk, Eric Pingree, Matthew J. Badiola, Ignacio Lyman, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Chen, Antonia F. Khalouf, Fred Zora, Keith DePalma, Michael Kohan, Lynn Guirguis, Maged Beall, Douglas Loudermilk, Eric Pingree, Matthew J. Badiola, Ignacio Lyman, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Chen, Antonia F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Safe and effective non-surgical treatments are an important part of the knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment algorithm. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are two commonly used modalities to manage symptoms associated with knee OA. METHODS: A prospective 1:1 randomized study was conducted in 177 patients comparing CRFA to HA injection with follow-ups at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. HA subjects with unsatisfactory outcomes at 6-months were allowed to crossover and receive CRFA. Knee pain (numeric rating scale = NRS), WOMAC Index (pain, stiffness and physical function), overall quality of life (global perceived effect = GPE, EQ-5D-5 L), and adverse events were measured. RESULTS: At 12-months, 65.2% of subjects in the CRFA cohort reported ≥50% pain relief from baseline. Mean NRS pain score was 2.8 ± 2.4 at 12 months (baseline 6.9 ± 0.8). Subjects in the CRFA cohort saw a 46.2% improvement in total WOMAC score at the 12-month timepoint. 64.5% of subjects in the crossover cohort reported ≥50% pain relief from baseline, with a mean NRS pain score of 3.0 ± 2.4 at 12 months (baseline 7.0 ± 1.0). After receiving CRFA, subjects in the crossover cohort had a 27.5% improvement in total WOMAC score. All subjects receiving CRFA reported significant improvement in quality of life. There were no serious adverse events related to either procedure and overall adverse event profiles were similar. CONCLUSION: A majority of subjects treated with CRFA demonstrated sustained knee pain relief for at least 12-months. Additionally, CRFA provided significant pain relief for HA subjects who crossed over 6 months after treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03381248. Registered 27 December 2017 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7285532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72855322020-06-10 Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection Chen, Antonia F. Khalouf, Fred Zora, Keith DePalma, Michael Kohan, Lynn Guirguis, Maged Beall, Douglas Loudermilk, Eric Pingree, Matthew J. Badiola, Ignacio Lyman, Jeffrey BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Safe and effective non-surgical treatments are an important part of the knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment algorithm. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are two commonly used modalities to manage symptoms associated with knee OA. METHODS: A prospective 1:1 randomized study was conducted in 177 patients comparing CRFA to HA injection with follow-ups at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. HA subjects with unsatisfactory outcomes at 6-months were allowed to crossover and receive CRFA. Knee pain (numeric rating scale = NRS), WOMAC Index (pain, stiffness and physical function), overall quality of life (global perceived effect = GPE, EQ-5D-5 L), and adverse events were measured. RESULTS: At 12-months, 65.2% of subjects in the CRFA cohort reported ≥50% pain relief from baseline. Mean NRS pain score was 2.8 ± 2.4 at 12 months (baseline 6.9 ± 0.8). Subjects in the CRFA cohort saw a 46.2% improvement in total WOMAC score at the 12-month timepoint. 64.5% of subjects in the crossover cohort reported ≥50% pain relief from baseline, with a mean NRS pain score of 3.0 ± 2.4 at 12 months (baseline 7.0 ± 1.0). After receiving CRFA, subjects in the crossover cohort had a 27.5% improvement in total WOMAC score. All subjects receiving CRFA reported significant improvement in quality of life. There were no serious adverse events related to either procedure and overall adverse event profiles were similar. CONCLUSION: A majority of subjects treated with CRFA demonstrated sustained knee pain relief for at least 12-months. Additionally, CRFA provided significant pain relief for HA subjects who crossed over 6 months after treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03381248. Registered 27 December 2017 BioMed Central 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7285532/ /pubmed/32517739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03380-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Antonia F. Khalouf, Fred Zora, Keith DePalma, Michael Kohan, Lynn Guirguis, Maged Beall, Douglas Loudermilk, Eric Pingree, Matthew J. Badiola, Ignacio Lyman, Jeffrey Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection |
title | Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection |
title_full | Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection |
title_fullStr | Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection |
title_short | Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection |
title_sort | cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03380-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenantoniaf cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT khalouffred cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT zorakeith cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT depalmamichael cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT kohanlynn cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT guirguismaged cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT bealldouglas cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT loudermilkeric cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT pingreematthewj cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT badiolaignacio cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection AT lymanjeffrey cooledradiofrequencyablationprovidesextendedclinicalutilityinthemanagementofkneeosteoarthritis12monthresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterrandomizedcrossovertrialcomparingcooledradiofrequencyablationtoasinglehyaluronicacidinjection |