Cargando…

Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is currently the fastest growing renal replacement therapy in the world. However, in light of the growing number of diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), the unwanted glucose absorption during APD remains problematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergling, Karin, de Arteaga, Javier, Ledesma, Fabián, Öberg, Carl Mikael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00620-2
_version_ 1783544724425015296
author Bergling, Karin
de Arteaga, Javier
Ledesma, Fabián
Öberg, Carl Mikael
author_facet Bergling, Karin
de Arteaga, Javier
Ledesma, Fabián
Öberg, Carl Mikael
author_sort Bergling, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is currently the fastest growing renal replacement therapy in the world. However, in light of the growing number of diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), the unwanted glucose absorption during APD remains problematic. Recent results, using an extended 3-pore model of APD, indicated that large reductions in glucose absorption are possible by using optimized bi-modal treatment regimens, having “UF cycles” using a higher glucose concentration, and “Clearance cycles” using a low concentration or, preferentially, no glucose. The present study is designed to test the theoretical prediction of a lower glucose absorption using these novel regimes. METHODS: This study is a randomized single-center, open-label, prospective study. Prevalent PD patients between 18 and 75 years old without known catheter problems or recent peritonitis are eligible for inclusion. Patients are allocated to a first treatment session of either standard APD (6 × 2 L 1.36% over 9 h) or optimized APD (7 × 2 L 2.27% + 5 × 2 L 0.1% over 8 h). A second treatment session using the other treatment will be performed in a crossover fashion. Samples of the dialysis fluid will be taken before and after the treatment, and the volume of the dialysate before and after the treatment will be carefully assessed. The primary endpoint is difference in glucose absorption between the optimized and standard treatment. Secondary endpoints are ultrafiltration, sodium removal, Kt/V urea, and Kt/V Creatinine. The study will be closed when a total of 20 patients have successfully completed the interventions or terminated according to interim analysis. A Monte Carlo power analysis shows that the study has 80% power to detect a difference of 10 g (in line with that of theoretical results) in glucose absorption between the two treatments in 10 patients. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first clinical investigation of optimized bi-modal treatments proposed by recent theoretical studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04017572. Registration date: July 12, 2019, retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7285558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72855582020-06-10 Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial Bergling, Karin de Arteaga, Javier Ledesma, Fabián Öberg, Carl Mikael Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is currently the fastest growing renal replacement therapy in the world. However, in light of the growing number of diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), the unwanted glucose absorption during APD remains problematic. Recent results, using an extended 3-pore model of APD, indicated that large reductions in glucose absorption are possible by using optimized bi-modal treatment regimens, having “UF cycles” using a higher glucose concentration, and “Clearance cycles” using a low concentration or, preferentially, no glucose. The present study is designed to test the theoretical prediction of a lower glucose absorption using these novel regimes. METHODS: This study is a randomized single-center, open-label, prospective study. Prevalent PD patients between 18 and 75 years old without known catheter problems or recent peritonitis are eligible for inclusion. Patients are allocated to a first treatment session of either standard APD (6 × 2 L 1.36% over 9 h) or optimized APD (7 × 2 L 2.27% + 5 × 2 L 0.1% over 8 h). A second treatment session using the other treatment will be performed in a crossover fashion. Samples of the dialysis fluid will be taken before and after the treatment, and the volume of the dialysate before and after the treatment will be carefully assessed. The primary endpoint is difference in glucose absorption between the optimized and standard treatment. Secondary endpoints are ultrafiltration, sodium removal, Kt/V urea, and Kt/V Creatinine. The study will be closed when a total of 20 patients have successfully completed the interventions or terminated according to interim analysis. A Monte Carlo power analysis shows that the study has 80% power to detect a difference of 10 g (in line with that of theoretical results) in glucose absorption between the two treatments in 10 patients. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first clinical investigation of optimized bi-modal treatments proposed by recent theoretical studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04017572. Registration date: July 12, 2019, retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7285558/ /pubmed/32528722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00620-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bergling, Karin
de Arteaga, Javier
Ledesma, Fabián
Öberg, Carl Mikael
Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial
title Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial
title_full Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial
title_fullStr Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial
title_short Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial
title_sort optimized vs. standard automated peritoneal dialysis regimens (optistar): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32528722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00620-2
work_keys_str_mv AT berglingkarin optimizedvsstandardautomatedperitonealdialysisregimensoptistarstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT dearteagajavier optimizedvsstandardautomatedperitonealdialysisregimensoptistarstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT ledesmafabian optimizedvsstandardautomatedperitonealdialysisregimensoptistarstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT obergcarlmikael optimizedvsstandardautomatedperitonealdialysisregimensoptistarstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial