Cargando…
What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology
Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00312-3 |
_version_ | 1783544751403827200 |
---|---|
author | Beyer, Thomas Bidaut, Luc Dickson, John Kachelriess, Marc Kiessling, Fabian Leitgeb, Rainer Ma, Jingfei Shiyam Sundar, Lalith Kumar Theek, Benjamin Mawlawi, Osama |
author_facet | Beyer, Thomas Bidaut, Luc Dickson, John Kachelriess, Marc Kiessling, Fabian Leitgeb, Rainer Ma, Jingfei Shiyam Sundar, Lalith Kumar Theek, Benjamin Mawlawi, Osama |
author_sort | Beyer, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected and characterized non-invasively, so as to provide referring oncologists with essential information to support therapy management decisions. Following the onset of stand-alone anatomical and functional imaging, we witness a push towards integrating molecular image information through various methods, including anato-metabolic imaging (e.g., PET/CT), advanced MRI, optical or ultrasound imaging. This perspective paper highlights a number of key technological and methodological advances in imaging instrumentation related to anatomical, functional, molecular medicine and hybrid imaging, that is understood as the hardware-based combination of complementary anatomical and molecular imaging. These include novel detector technologies for ionizing radiation used in CT and nuclear medicine imaging, and novel system developments in MRI and optical as well as opto-acoustic imaging. We will also highlight new data processing methods for improved non-invasive tissue characterization. Following a general introduction to the role of imaging in oncology patient management we introduce imaging methods with well-defined clinical applications and potential for clinical translation. For each modality, we report first on the status quo and, then point to perceived technological and methodological advances in a subsequent status go section. Considering the breadth and dynamics of these developments, this perspective ends with a critical reflection on where the authors, with the majority of them being imaging experts with a background in physics and engineering, believe imaging methods will be in a few years from now. Overall, methodological and technological medical imaging advances are geared towards increased image contrast, the derivation of reproducible quantitative parameters, an increase in volume sensitivity and a reduction in overall examination time. To ensure full translation to the clinic, this progress in technologies and instrumentation is complemented by advances in relevant acquisition and image-processing protocols and improved data analysis. To this end, we should accept diagnostic images as “data”, and – through the wider adoption of advanced analysis, including machine learning approaches and a “big data” concept – move to the next stage of non-invasive tumour phenotyping. The scans we will be reading in 10 years from now will likely be composed of highly diverse multi-dimensional data from multiple sources, which mandate the use of advanced and interactive visualization and analysis platforms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for real-time data handling by cross-specialty clinical experts with a domain knowledge that will need to go beyond that of plain imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7285725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72857252020-06-11 What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology Beyer, Thomas Bidaut, Luc Dickson, John Kachelriess, Marc Kiessling, Fabian Leitgeb, Rainer Ma, Jingfei Shiyam Sundar, Lalith Kumar Theek, Benjamin Mawlawi, Osama Cancer Imaging Review Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected and characterized non-invasively, so as to provide referring oncologists with essential information to support therapy management decisions. Following the onset of stand-alone anatomical and functional imaging, we witness a push towards integrating molecular image information through various methods, including anato-metabolic imaging (e.g., PET/CT), advanced MRI, optical or ultrasound imaging. This perspective paper highlights a number of key technological and methodological advances in imaging instrumentation related to anatomical, functional, molecular medicine and hybrid imaging, that is understood as the hardware-based combination of complementary anatomical and molecular imaging. These include novel detector technologies for ionizing radiation used in CT and nuclear medicine imaging, and novel system developments in MRI and optical as well as opto-acoustic imaging. We will also highlight new data processing methods for improved non-invasive tissue characterization. Following a general introduction to the role of imaging in oncology patient management we introduce imaging methods with well-defined clinical applications and potential for clinical translation. For each modality, we report first on the status quo and, then point to perceived technological and methodological advances in a subsequent status go section. Considering the breadth and dynamics of these developments, this perspective ends with a critical reflection on where the authors, with the majority of them being imaging experts with a background in physics and engineering, believe imaging methods will be in a few years from now. Overall, methodological and technological medical imaging advances are geared towards increased image contrast, the derivation of reproducible quantitative parameters, an increase in volume sensitivity and a reduction in overall examination time. To ensure full translation to the clinic, this progress in technologies and instrumentation is complemented by advances in relevant acquisition and image-processing protocols and improved data analysis. To this end, we should accept diagnostic images as “data”, and – through the wider adoption of advanced analysis, including machine learning approaches and a “big data” concept – move to the next stage of non-invasive tumour phenotyping. The scans we will be reading in 10 years from now will likely be composed of highly diverse multi-dimensional data from multiple sources, which mandate the use of advanced and interactive visualization and analysis platforms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for real-time data handling by cross-specialty clinical experts with a domain knowledge that will need to go beyond that of plain imaging. BioMed Central 2020-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7285725/ /pubmed/32517801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00312-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Beyer, Thomas Bidaut, Luc Dickson, John Kachelriess, Marc Kiessling, Fabian Leitgeb, Rainer Ma, Jingfei Shiyam Sundar, Lalith Kumar Theek, Benjamin Mawlawi, Osama What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology |
title | What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology |
title_full | What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology |
title_fullStr | What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology |
title_full_unstemmed | What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology |
title_short | What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology |
title_sort | what scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00312-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beyerthomas whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT bidautluc whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT dicksonjohn whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT kachelriessmarc whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT kiesslingfabian whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT leitgebrainer whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT majingfei whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT shiyamsundarlalithkumar whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT theekbenjamin whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology AT mawlawiosama whatscanswewillreadimaginginstrumentationtrendsinclinicaloncology |