Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Using [(18)F] Sodium Fuoride (NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) it is not only possible to identify the ossifying potency of a flare‐up, but also to identify an asymptomatic chronic stage of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnosti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botman, Esmée, Teunissen, Bernd P, Raijmakers, Pieter, de Graaf, Pim, Yaqub, Maqsood, Treurniet, Sanne, Schoenmaker, Ton, Bravenboer, Nathalie, Micha, Dimitra, Pals, Gerard, Bökenkamp, Arend, Netelenbos, J Coen, Lammertsma, Adriaan A, Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10363
_version_ 1783544759038509056
author Botman, Esmée
Teunissen, Bernd P
Raijmakers, Pieter
de Graaf, Pim
Yaqub, Maqsood
Treurniet, Sanne
Schoenmaker, Ton
Bravenboer, Nathalie
Micha, Dimitra
Pals, Gerard
Bökenkamp, Arend
Netelenbos, J Coen
Lammertsma, Adriaan A
Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW
author_facet Botman, Esmée
Teunissen, Bernd P
Raijmakers, Pieter
de Graaf, Pim
Yaqub, Maqsood
Treurniet, Sanne
Schoenmaker, Ton
Bravenboer, Nathalie
Micha, Dimitra
Pals, Gerard
Bökenkamp, Arend
Netelenbos, J Coen
Lammertsma, Adriaan A
Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW
author_sort Botman, Esmée
collection PubMed
description Using [(18)F] Sodium Fuoride (NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) it is not only possible to identify the ossifying potency of a flare‐up, but also to identify an asymptomatic chronic stage of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic role of a more widely available imaging modality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which is of special interest for studies in pediatric FOP patients. MRI and [(18)F]NaF PET/CT images at time of inclusion and subsequent follow‐up CT scans of 4 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Presence, location, and intensity of edema identified by MRI were compared with activity on [(18)F]NaF PET. Occurrence or progression of heterotopic ossification (HO) was examined on the follow‐up CT images. Thirteen different lesions in various muscle groups were identified: five lesions with only edema, five lesions with both edema and increased [(18)F]NaF uptake, one lesion with only increased [(18)F]NaF uptake, and two lesions with neither edema nor uptake of [(18)F]NaF. Mild edema, found in three lesions, was present at asymptomatic sites, which did not show increased [(18)F] NaF uptake or progression of HO on consecutive CT images. Moderate edema was found in three symptomatic lesions, with increased [(18)F]NaF on PET and progression of HO on CT. Severe edema was identified in four lesions. Interestingly, two of these lesions did not develop HO during follow‐up; one of these two even gave obvious symptoms of a flare‐up. MRI can identify whether symptoms are the result of an acute flare‐up by the presence of moderate to severe edema. The occurrence of severe edema on MRI was not always related to an ossifying lesion. The additional diagnostic value of MRI requires further investigation, but MRI does not seem to fully replace the diagnostic characteristics of [(18)F]NaF PET/CT in FOP. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7285757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72857572020-06-11 Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Botman, Esmée Teunissen, Bernd P Raijmakers, Pieter de Graaf, Pim Yaqub, Maqsood Treurniet, Sanne Schoenmaker, Ton Bravenboer, Nathalie Micha, Dimitra Pals, Gerard Bökenkamp, Arend Netelenbos, J Coen Lammertsma, Adriaan A Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW JBMR Plus Original Articles Using [(18)F] Sodium Fuoride (NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) it is not only possible to identify the ossifying potency of a flare‐up, but also to identify an asymptomatic chronic stage of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic role of a more widely available imaging modality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which is of special interest for studies in pediatric FOP patients. MRI and [(18)F]NaF PET/CT images at time of inclusion and subsequent follow‐up CT scans of 4 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Presence, location, and intensity of edema identified by MRI were compared with activity on [(18)F]NaF PET. Occurrence or progression of heterotopic ossification (HO) was examined on the follow‐up CT images. Thirteen different lesions in various muscle groups were identified: five lesions with only edema, five lesions with both edema and increased [(18)F]NaF uptake, one lesion with only increased [(18)F]NaF uptake, and two lesions with neither edema nor uptake of [(18)F]NaF. Mild edema, found in three lesions, was present at asymptomatic sites, which did not show increased [(18)F] NaF uptake or progression of HO on consecutive CT images. Moderate edema was found in three symptomatic lesions, with increased [(18)F]NaF on PET and progression of HO on CT. Severe edema was identified in four lesions. Interestingly, two of these lesions did not develop HO during follow‐up; one of these two even gave obvious symptoms of a flare‐up. MRI can identify whether symptoms are the result of an acute flare‐up by the presence of moderate to severe edema. The occurrence of severe edema on MRI was not always related to an ossifying lesion. The additional diagnostic value of MRI requires further investigation, but MRI does not seem to fully replace the diagnostic characteristics of [(18)F]NaF PET/CT in FOP. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7285757/ /pubmed/32537549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10363 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Botman, Esmée
Teunissen, Bernd P
Raijmakers, Pieter
de Graaf, Pim
Yaqub, Maqsood
Treurniet, Sanne
Schoenmaker, Ton
Bravenboer, Nathalie
Micha, Dimitra
Pals, Gerard
Bökenkamp, Arend
Netelenbos, J Coen
Lammertsma, Adriaan A
Eekhoff, Elisabeth MW
Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
title Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
title_full Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
title_short Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
title_sort diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32537549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10363
work_keys_str_mv AT botmanesmee diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT teunissenberndp diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT raijmakerspieter diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT degraafpim diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT yaqubmaqsood diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT treurnietsanne diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT schoenmakerton diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT bravenboernathalie diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT michadimitra diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT palsgerard diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT bokenkamparend diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT netelenbosjcoen diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT lammertsmaadriaana diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva
AT eekhoffelisabethmw diagnosticvalueofmagneticresonanceimaginginfibrodysplasiaossificansprogressiva