Cargando…

Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?

The rate of discovery of new spider species greatly exceeds the rate of spider venom characterisation, leading to an increasing number of species with unstudied venoms. However, recent advances in proteomics and genomics that enable the study of venoms from smaller species has expanded the accessibl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herzig, Volker, King, Glenn F., Undheim, Eivind A.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxcx.2018.100005
_version_ 1783544786270027776
author Herzig, Volker
King, Glenn F.
Undheim, Eivind A.B.
author_facet Herzig, Volker
King, Glenn F.
Undheim, Eivind A.B.
author_sort Herzig, Volker
collection PubMed
description The rate of discovery of new spider species greatly exceeds the rate of spider venom characterisation, leading to an increasing number of species with unstudied venoms. However, recent advances in proteomics and genomics that enable the study of venoms from smaller species has expanded the accessible taxonomic range. Thus, although the number of unstudied spider venoms is likely to further increase, future research should focus on the characterisation of venoms and toxins from previously unstudied spider families.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7285914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72859142020-06-16 Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research? Herzig, Volker King, Glenn F. Undheim, Eivind A.B. Toxicon X Short Communication The rate of discovery of new spider species greatly exceeds the rate of spider venom characterisation, leading to an increasing number of species with unstudied venoms. However, recent advances in proteomics and genomics that enable the study of venoms from smaller species has expanded the accessible taxonomic range. Thus, although the number of unstudied spider venoms is likely to further increase, future research should focus on the characterisation of venoms and toxins from previously unstudied spider families. Elsevier 2019-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7285914/ /pubmed/32550562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxcx.2018.100005 Text en © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Herzig, Volker
King, Glenn F.
Undheim, Eivind A.B.
Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_full Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_fullStr Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_full_unstemmed Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_short Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
title_sort can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research?
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxcx.2018.100005
work_keys_str_mv AT herzigvolker canweresolvethetaxonomicbiasinspidervenomresearch
AT kingglennf canweresolvethetaxonomicbiasinspidervenomresearch
AT undheimeivindab canweresolvethetaxonomicbiasinspidervenomresearch