Cargando…

Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic

PURPOSE: The COVID‐19 pandemic has led to disorder in work and livelihood of a majority of the modern world. In this work, we review its major impacts on procedures and workflow of clinical physics tasks, and suggest alternate pathways to avoid major disruption or discontinuity of physics tasks in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darafsheh, Arash, Lavvafi, Hossein, Taleei, Reza, Khan, Rao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12896
_version_ 1783544788386054144
author Darafsheh, Arash
Lavvafi, Hossein
Taleei, Reza
Khan, Rao
author_facet Darafsheh, Arash
Lavvafi, Hossein
Taleei, Reza
Khan, Rao
author_sort Darafsheh, Arash
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The COVID‐19 pandemic has led to disorder in work and livelihood of a majority of the modern world. In this work, we review its major impacts on procedures and workflow of clinical physics tasks, and suggest alternate pathways to avoid major disruption or discontinuity of physics tasks in the context of small, medium, and large radiation oncology clinics. We also evaluate scalability of medical physics under the stress of “social distancing”. METHODS: Three models of facilities characterized by the number of clinical physicists, daily patient throughput, and equipment were identified for this purpose. For identical objectives of continuity of clinical operations, with constraints such as social distancing and unavailability of staff due to system strain, however with the possibility of remote operations, the performance of these models was investigated. General clinical tasks requiring on‐site personnel presence or otherwise were evaluated to determine the scalability of the three models at this point in the course of disease spread within their surroundings. RESULTS: The clinical physics tasks within three models could be divided into two categories. The former, which requires individual presence, include safety‐sensitive radiation delivery, high dose per fraction treatments, brachytherapy procedures, fulfilling state and nuclear regulatory commission's requirements, etc. The latter, which can be handled through remote means, include dose planning, physics plan review and supervision of quality assurance, general troubleshooting, etc. CONCLUSION: At the current level of disease in the United States, all three models have sustained major system stress in continuing reduced operation. However, the small clinic model may not perform if either the current level of infections is maintained for long or staff becomes unavailable due to health issues. With abundance, and diversity of innovative resources, medium and large clinic models can sustain further for physics‐related radiotherapy services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7285927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72859272020-06-10 Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic Darafsheh, Arash Lavvafi, Hossein Taleei, Reza Khan, Rao J Appl Clin Med Phys Management and Profession PURPOSE: The COVID‐19 pandemic has led to disorder in work and livelihood of a majority of the modern world. In this work, we review its major impacts on procedures and workflow of clinical physics tasks, and suggest alternate pathways to avoid major disruption or discontinuity of physics tasks in the context of small, medium, and large radiation oncology clinics. We also evaluate scalability of medical physics under the stress of “social distancing”. METHODS: Three models of facilities characterized by the number of clinical physicists, daily patient throughput, and equipment were identified for this purpose. For identical objectives of continuity of clinical operations, with constraints such as social distancing and unavailability of staff due to system strain, however with the possibility of remote operations, the performance of these models was investigated. General clinical tasks requiring on‐site personnel presence or otherwise were evaluated to determine the scalability of the three models at this point in the course of disease spread within their surroundings. RESULTS: The clinical physics tasks within three models could be divided into two categories. The former, which requires individual presence, include safety‐sensitive radiation delivery, high dose per fraction treatments, brachytherapy procedures, fulfilling state and nuclear regulatory commission's requirements, etc. The latter, which can be handled through remote means, include dose planning, physics plan review and supervision of quality assurance, general troubleshooting, etc. CONCLUSION: At the current level of disease in the United States, all three models have sustained major system stress in continuing reduced operation. However, the small clinic model may not perform if either the current level of infections is maintained for long or staff becomes unavailable due to health issues. With abundance, and diversity of innovative resources, medium and large clinic models can sustain further for physics‐related radiotherapy services. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7285927/ /pubmed/32432389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12896 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Management and Profession
Darafsheh, Arash
Lavvafi, Hossein
Taleei, Reza
Khan, Rao
Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_fullStr Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_short Mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the COVID‐19 pandemic
title_sort mitigating disruptions, and scalability of radiation oncology physics work during the covid‐19 pandemic
topic Management and Profession
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7285927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32432389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12896
work_keys_str_mv AT darafsheharash mitigatingdisruptionsandscalabilityofradiationoncologyphysicsworkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT lavvafihossein mitigatingdisruptionsandscalabilityofradiationoncologyphysicsworkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT taleeireza mitigatingdisruptionsandscalabilityofradiationoncologyphysicsworkduringthecovid19pandemic
AT khanrao mitigatingdisruptionsandscalabilityofradiationoncologyphysicsworkduringthecovid19pandemic