Cargando…

Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units

Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) image quality metrics were evaluated on an Accuray Radixact unit to recommend scan settings for the implementation of a consistent adaptive radiotherapy program. Megavoltage computed tomography image quality was evaluated and compared to a kilovoltage CT (kVCT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velten, Christian, Boyd, Robert, Jeong, Kyoungkeun, Garg, Madhur K., Tomé, Wolfgang A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32216082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12859
_version_ 1783544803576774656
author Velten, Christian
Boyd, Robert
Jeong, Kyoungkeun
Garg, Madhur K.
Tomé, Wolfgang A.
author_facet Velten, Christian
Boyd, Robert
Jeong, Kyoungkeun
Garg, Madhur K.
Tomé, Wolfgang A.
author_sort Velten, Christian
collection PubMed
description Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) image quality metrics were evaluated on an Accuray Radixact unit to recommend scan settings for the implementation of a consistent adaptive radiotherapy program. Megavoltage computed tomography image quality was evaluated and compared to a kilovoltage CT (kVCT) simulator using a commercial cone beam computed tomography image quality phantom. Megavoltage computed tomographies were acquired on the Accuray Radixact using fine, normal, and coarse pitches, with all available reconstruction slice thicknesses, each of which were reconstructed using standard and iterative reconstruction (IR). Image quality metrics (IQM) were evaluated using DoseLab: automatically and manually calculated spatial resolution, subject contrast, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR). Scanning time was 15.6 s/cm for fine, 8.1 s/cm for normal, and 5.6 s/cm for coarse pitch. Automatically evaluated spatial resolutions ranged from 0.39, 0.41, to 0.42 lp/mm for standard reconstruction and from 0.24, 0.21, to 0.18 lp/mm for soft‐tissue IR, respectively, with general IR yielding values in between these. Spatial resolution for kVCT was measured to be at least 0.42 lp/mm. Contrast was consistent across MVCT settings with 8.1 ± 0.2%, while kVCT contrast was 10.27 ± 0.05%. CNR was calculated to be 3.3 ± 0.4 for standard reconstruction, 7.4 ± 0.4 for general IR, and 12.0 ± 1.9 for soft‐tissue IR. It was found that increasing reconstruction slice thickness for a given pitch does not improve IQMs. Based on the consistency of contrast metrics across pitch values and the only slightly reduced spatial resolution using normal compared to fine pitch, we recommend the use of normal pitch with 2 mm slice thickness to maximize image quality for ART while limiting scanning time. Only for sites for which improved CNR is required and reduced spatial resolution is acceptable, soft‐tissue IR is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7286013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72860132020-06-11 Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units Velten, Christian Boyd, Robert Jeong, Kyoungkeun Garg, Madhur K. Tomé, Wolfgang A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) image quality metrics were evaluated on an Accuray Radixact unit to recommend scan settings for the implementation of a consistent adaptive radiotherapy program. Megavoltage computed tomography image quality was evaluated and compared to a kilovoltage CT (kVCT) simulator using a commercial cone beam computed tomography image quality phantom. Megavoltage computed tomographies were acquired on the Accuray Radixact using fine, normal, and coarse pitches, with all available reconstruction slice thicknesses, each of which were reconstructed using standard and iterative reconstruction (IR). Image quality metrics (IQM) were evaluated using DoseLab: automatically and manually calculated spatial resolution, subject contrast, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR). Scanning time was 15.6 s/cm for fine, 8.1 s/cm for normal, and 5.6 s/cm for coarse pitch. Automatically evaluated spatial resolutions ranged from 0.39, 0.41, to 0.42 lp/mm for standard reconstruction and from 0.24, 0.21, to 0.18 lp/mm for soft‐tissue IR, respectively, with general IR yielding values in between these. Spatial resolution for kVCT was measured to be at least 0.42 lp/mm. Contrast was consistent across MVCT settings with 8.1 ± 0.2%, while kVCT contrast was 10.27 ± 0.05%. CNR was calculated to be 3.3 ± 0.4 for standard reconstruction, 7.4 ± 0.4 for general IR, and 12.0 ± 1.9 for soft‐tissue IR. It was found that increasing reconstruction slice thickness for a given pitch does not improve IQMs. Based on the consistency of contrast metrics across pitch values and the only slightly reduced spatial resolution using normal compared to fine pitch, we recommend the use of normal pitch with 2 mm slice thickness to maximize image quality for ART while limiting scanning time. Only for sites for which improved CNR is required and reduced spatial resolution is acceptable, soft‐tissue IR is recommended. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7286013/ /pubmed/32216082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12859 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Velten, Christian
Boyd, Robert
Jeong, Kyoungkeun
Garg, Madhur K.
Tomé, Wolfgang A.
Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units
title Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units
title_full Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units
title_fullStr Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units
title_short Recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units
title_sort recommendations of megavoltage computed tomography settings for the implementation of adaptive radiotherapy on helical tomotherapy units
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32216082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12859
work_keys_str_mv AT veltenchristian recommendationsofmegavoltagecomputedtomographysettingsfortheimplementationofadaptiveradiotherapyonhelicaltomotherapyunits
AT boydrobert recommendationsofmegavoltagecomputedtomographysettingsfortheimplementationofadaptiveradiotherapyonhelicaltomotherapyunits
AT jeongkyoungkeun recommendationsofmegavoltagecomputedtomographysettingsfortheimplementationofadaptiveradiotherapyonhelicaltomotherapyunits
AT gargmadhurk recommendationsofmegavoltagecomputedtomographysettingsfortheimplementationofadaptiveradiotherapyonhelicaltomotherapyunits
AT tomewolfganga recommendationsofmegavoltagecomputedtomographysettingsfortheimplementationofadaptiveradiotherapyonhelicaltomotherapyunits