Cargando…
Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
OBJECTIVES: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) and care planning are proposed to address unmet needs of people treated for cancer. We tested whether HNA and care planning by an allied health professional improved cancer-specific quality of life for women following curative treatment for stage I–III gyn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001207 |
_version_ | 1783544808494596096 |
---|---|
author | Sandsund, Catherine Towers, Richard Thomas, Karen Tigue, Ruth Lalji, Amyn Fernandes, Andreia Doyle, Natalie Jordan, Jake Gage, Heather Shaw, Clare |
author_facet | Sandsund, Catherine Towers, Richard Thomas, Karen Tigue, Ruth Lalji, Amyn Fernandes, Andreia Doyle, Natalie Jordan, Jake Gage, Heather Shaw, Clare |
author_sort | Sandsund, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) and care planning are proposed to address unmet needs of people treated for cancer. We tested whether HNA and care planning by an allied health professional improved cancer-specific quality of life for women following curative treatment for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. METHODS: Consecutive women were invited to participate in a randomised controlled study (HNA and care planning vs usual care) at a UK cancer centre. Data were collected by questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The outcomes were 6-month change in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (version 3), global score (primary) and, in EORTC subscales, generic quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary). The study was blinded for data management and analysis. Differences in outcomes were compared between groups. Health service utilisation and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) (from Short Form-6) were gathered for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data from an exit interview. RESULTS: 150 women consented (75 per group); 10 undertook interviews. For 124 participants (61 intervention, 63 controls) with complete data, no statistically significant differences were seen between groups in the primary endpoint. The majority of those interviewed reported important personal gains they attributed to the intervention, which reflected trends to improvement seen in EORTC functional and symptom scales. Economic analysis suggests a 62% probability of cost-effectiveness at a £30 000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: Care plan development with an allied health professional is cost-effective, acceptable and useful for some women treated for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. We recommend its introduction early in the pathway to support person-centred care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7286034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72860342020-06-15 Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods Sandsund, Catherine Towers, Richard Thomas, Karen Tigue, Ruth Lalji, Amyn Fernandes, Andreia Doyle, Natalie Jordan, Jake Gage, Heather Shaw, Clare BMJ Support Palliat Care Original Research OBJECTIVES: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) and care planning are proposed to address unmet needs of people treated for cancer. We tested whether HNA and care planning by an allied health professional improved cancer-specific quality of life for women following curative treatment for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. METHODS: Consecutive women were invited to participate in a randomised controlled study (HNA and care planning vs usual care) at a UK cancer centre. Data were collected by questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The outcomes were 6-month change in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (version 3), global score (primary) and, in EORTC subscales, generic quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary). The study was blinded for data management and analysis. Differences in outcomes were compared between groups. Health service utilisation and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) (from Short Form-6) were gathered for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data from an exit interview. RESULTS: 150 women consented (75 per group); 10 undertook interviews. For 124 participants (61 intervention, 63 controls) with complete data, no statistically significant differences were seen between groups in the primary endpoint. The majority of those interviewed reported important personal gains they attributed to the intervention, which reflected trends to improvement seen in EORTC functional and symptom scales. Economic analysis suggests a 62% probability of cost-effectiveness at a £30 000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: Care plan development with an allied health professional is cost-effective, acceptable and useful for some women treated for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. We recommend its introduction early in the pathway to support person-centred care. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7286034/ /pubmed/28847853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001207 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2020. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sandsund, Catherine Towers, Richard Thomas, Karen Tigue, Ruth Lalji, Amyn Fernandes, Andreia Doyle, Natalie Jordan, Jake Gage, Heather Shaw, Clare Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods |
title | Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods |
title_full | Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods |
title_fullStr | Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods |
title_short | Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods |
title_sort | holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? a randomised controlled trial using mixed methods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandsundcatherine holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT towersrichard holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT thomaskaren holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT tigueruth holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT laljiamyn holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT fernandesandreia holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT doylenatalie holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT jordanjake holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT gageheather holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods AT shawclare holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods |