Cargando…

Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods

OBJECTIVES: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) and care planning are proposed to address unmet needs of people treated for cancer. We tested whether HNA and care planning by an allied health professional improved cancer-specific quality of life for women following curative treatment for stage I–III gyn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandsund, Catherine, Towers, Richard, Thomas, Karen, Tigue, Ruth, Lalji, Amyn, Fernandes, Andreia, Doyle, Natalie, Jordan, Jake, Gage, Heather, Shaw, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001207
_version_ 1783544808494596096
author Sandsund, Catherine
Towers, Richard
Thomas, Karen
Tigue, Ruth
Lalji, Amyn
Fernandes, Andreia
Doyle, Natalie
Jordan, Jake
Gage, Heather
Shaw, Clare
author_facet Sandsund, Catherine
Towers, Richard
Thomas, Karen
Tigue, Ruth
Lalji, Amyn
Fernandes, Andreia
Doyle, Natalie
Jordan, Jake
Gage, Heather
Shaw, Clare
author_sort Sandsund, Catherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) and care planning are proposed to address unmet needs of people treated for cancer. We tested whether HNA and care planning by an allied health professional improved cancer-specific quality of life for women following curative treatment for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. METHODS: Consecutive women were invited to participate in a randomised controlled study (HNA and care planning vs usual care) at a UK cancer centre. Data were collected by questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The outcomes were 6-month change in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (version 3), global score (primary) and, in EORTC subscales, generic quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary). The study was blinded for data management and analysis. Differences in outcomes were compared between groups. Health service utilisation and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) (from Short Form-6) were gathered for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data from an exit interview. RESULTS: 150 women consented (75 per group); 10 undertook interviews. For 124 participants (61 intervention, 63 controls) with complete data, no statistically significant differences were seen between groups in the primary endpoint. The majority of those interviewed reported important personal gains they attributed to the intervention, which reflected trends to improvement seen in EORTC functional and symptom scales. Economic analysis suggests a 62% probability of cost-effectiveness at a £30 000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: Care plan development with an allied health professional is cost-effective, acceptable and useful for some women treated for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. We recommend its introduction early in the pathway to support person-centred care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7286034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72860342020-06-15 Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods Sandsund, Catherine Towers, Richard Thomas, Karen Tigue, Ruth Lalji, Amyn Fernandes, Andreia Doyle, Natalie Jordan, Jake Gage, Heather Shaw, Clare BMJ Support Palliat Care Original Research OBJECTIVES: Holistic needs assessment (HNA) and care planning are proposed to address unmet needs of people treated for cancer. We tested whether HNA and care planning by an allied health professional improved cancer-specific quality of life for women following curative treatment for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. METHODS: Consecutive women were invited to participate in a randomised controlled study (HNA and care planning vs usual care) at a UK cancer centre. Data were collected by questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The outcomes were 6-month change in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (version 3), global score (primary) and, in EORTC subscales, generic quality of life and self-efficacy (secondary). The study was blinded for data management and analysis. Differences in outcomes were compared between groups. Health service utilisation and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) (from Short Form-6) were gathered for a cost-effectiveness analysis. Thematic analysis was used to interpret data from an exit interview. RESULTS: 150 women consented (75 per group); 10 undertook interviews. For 124 participants (61 intervention, 63 controls) with complete data, no statistically significant differences were seen between groups in the primary endpoint. The majority of those interviewed reported important personal gains they attributed to the intervention, which reflected trends to improvement seen in EORTC functional and symptom scales. Economic analysis suggests a 62% probability of cost-effectiveness at a £30 000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSION: Care plan development with an allied health professional is cost-effective, acceptable and useful for some women treated for stage I–III gynaecological cancer. We recommend its introduction early in the pathway to support person-centred care. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7286034/ /pubmed/28847853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001207 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2020. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Sandsund, Catherine
Towers, Richard
Thomas, Karen
Tigue, Ruth
Lalji, Amyn
Fernandes, Andreia
Doyle, Natalie
Jordan, Jake
Gage, Heather
Shaw, Clare
Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
title Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
title_full Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
title_fullStr Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
title_full_unstemmed Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
title_short Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
title_sort holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? a randomised controlled trial using mixed methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28847853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001207
work_keys_str_mv AT sandsundcatherine holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT towersrichard holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT thomaskaren holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT tigueruth holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT laljiamyn holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT fernandesandreia holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT doylenatalie holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT jordanjake holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT gageheather holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods
AT shawclare holisticneedsassessmentandcareplansforwomenwithgynaecologicalcancerdotheyimprovecancerspecifichealthrelatedqualityoflifearandomisedcontrolledtrialusingmixedmethods