Cargando…

Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between health insurance coverage, income level and contraceptive use — overall and most/moderately effective method use — among women ages 18–44 at risk of pregnancy, within and across 41 United States jurisdictions in 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the 2017...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavanaugh, Megan L., Douglas-Hall, Ayana, Finn, Sean M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014
_version_ 1783544826971553792
author Kavanaugh, Megan L.
Douglas-Hall, Ayana
Finn, Sean M.
author_facet Kavanaugh, Megan L.
Douglas-Hall, Ayana
Finn, Sean M.
author_sort Kavanaugh, Megan L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between health insurance coverage, income level and contraceptive use — overall and most/moderately effective method use — among women ages 18–44 at risk of pregnancy, within and across 41 United States jurisdictions in 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we calculated the proportions of women using any contraceptive method and using a most or moderately effective method for each state/territory and across all jurisdictions, categorized by health insurance coverage and income groups. For both contraceptive use outcomes, we ran simple and multivariable logistic regression models to test for significant differences in outcomes between insured and uninsured individuals. RESULTS: Across jurisdictions, compared to uninsured women, those who had health care coverage had higher levels of contraceptive use (65% versus 59%; p < .001) and most/moderately effective contraceptive use (43% compared to 35%; p < .001); low-income women with coverage also had higher levels of contraceptive use (64% versus 61%; p < .05) and most or moderately effective contraceptive use (42% versus 36%; p < .01) than their uninsured counterparts. Controlling for individual-level demographic characteristics, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of most or moderately effective contraceptive use across jurisdictions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.33, p < .01). In 11 states, insured women had significantly higher odds of at least one contraceptive use metric than their uninsured counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in contraceptive use across the states likely reflects broader demographic, social and structural differences across state and local populations. States' political will and support around contraceptive access likely play a role in individuals' ability to obtain and use contraception. IMPLICATIONS: Our key finding that insurance coverage is significantly associated with use of most/moderately effective contraceptive methods across the states but not any contraceptive use underscores the importance of health insurance in aiding access to methods that are more costly and often require a visit to a health care provider.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7286150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72861502020-06-16 Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Kavanaugh, Megan L. Douglas-Hall, Ayana Finn, Sean M. Contracept X Article OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between health insurance coverage, income level and contraceptive use — overall and most/moderately effective method use — among women ages 18–44 at risk of pregnancy, within and across 41 United States jurisdictions in 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we calculated the proportions of women using any contraceptive method and using a most or moderately effective method for each state/territory and across all jurisdictions, categorized by health insurance coverage and income groups. For both contraceptive use outcomes, we ran simple and multivariable logistic regression models to test for significant differences in outcomes between insured and uninsured individuals. RESULTS: Across jurisdictions, compared to uninsured women, those who had health care coverage had higher levels of contraceptive use (65% versus 59%; p < .001) and most/moderately effective contraceptive use (43% compared to 35%; p < .001); low-income women with coverage also had higher levels of contraceptive use (64% versus 61%; p < .05) and most or moderately effective contraceptive use (42% versus 36%; p < .01) than their uninsured counterparts. Controlling for individual-level demographic characteristics, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of most or moderately effective contraceptive use across jurisdictions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.33, p < .01). In 11 states, insured women had significantly higher odds of at least one contraceptive use metric than their uninsured counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in contraceptive use across the states likely reflects broader demographic, social and structural differences across state and local populations. States' political will and support around contraceptive access likely play a role in individuals' ability to obtain and use contraception. IMPLICATIONS: Our key finding that insurance coverage is significantly associated with use of most/moderately effective contraceptive methods across the states but not any contraceptive use underscores the importance of health insurance in aiding access to methods that are more costly and often require a visit to a health care provider. Elsevier 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7286150/ /pubmed/32550529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kavanaugh, Megan L.
Douglas-Hall, Ayana
Finn, Sean M.
Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
title Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
title_full Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
title_fullStr Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
title_full_unstemmed Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
title_short Health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
title_sort health insurance coverage and contraceptive use at the state level: findings from the 2017 behavioral risk factor surveillance system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100014
work_keys_str_mv AT kavanaughmeganl healthinsurancecoverageandcontraceptiveuseatthestatelevelfindingsfromthe2017behavioralriskfactorsurveillancesystem
AT douglashallayana healthinsurancecoverageandcontraceptiveuseatthestatelevelfindingsfromthe2017behavioralriskfactorsurveillancesystem
AT finnseanm healthinsurancecoverageandcontraceptiveuseatthestatelevelfindingsfromthe2017behavioralriskfactorsurveillancesystem