Cargando…

Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroparesis despite standard fasting in diabetic patients may increase the aspiration risk. This study aimed to compare fasting gastric volume (GV) of diabetic with non-diabetic patients scheduled for elective surgery using USG. METHODS: This prospective observational study in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Heena, Podder, Subrata, Bala, Indu, Gulati, Ajay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724247
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_796_19
_version_ 1783544872955805696
author Garg, Heena
Podder, Subrata
Bala, Indu
Gulati, Ajay
author_facet Garg, Heena
Podder, Subrata
Bala, Indu
Gulati, Ajay
author_sort Garg, Heena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroparesis despite standard fasting in diabetic patients may increase the aspiration risk. This study aimed to compare fasting gastric volume (GV) of diabetic with non-diabetic patients scheduled for elective surgery using USG. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 53 diabetic and 50 non-diabetic patients aged >18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status I-III having similar fasting intervals. Before induction, using standard gastric scanning protocol, qualitative and quantitative assessments of gastric antrum in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions were performed with a curved array probe. USG grade, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the antrum and GV were calculated. The gastric antrum was classified as Grade 0, 1 or 2, signifying empty antrum, fluid in RLD position only and antral fluid in both supine and RLD positions, respectively. RESULTS: In supine position, CC and AP diameters were 1.96 ± 0.41 cm and 0.9 ± 0.57 cm in control group and 2.28 ± 0.50 cm and 1.39 ± 0.44 cm in diabetic group, respectively. In RLD, CC was 2.28 ± 0.57 cm and AP was 1.24 ± 0.42 cm in control group as compared to CC 2.54 ± 0.56 cm and AP 1.82 ± 0.56 cm in diabetic group. The CSA of 2.57 ± 1.19 cm(2) and 3.73 ± 1.61 cm(2) in diabetic were significantly higher (P = 0.001) than 1.41 ± 0.55 cm(2) and 2.30 ± 1.18 cm(2) of control, in supine and RLD positions, respectively. GV was 4.20 ± 22.26 ml in control group and 9.15 ± 25.70 ml in diabetic group. CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients have higher gastric antral cross-sectional area and gastric volumes as observed by gastric ultrasound than the non-diabetic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7286410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72864102020-07-27 Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study Garg, Heena Podder, Subrata Bala, Indu Gulati, Ajay Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroparesis despite standard fasting in diabetic patients may increase the aspiration risk. This study aimed to compare fasting gastric volume (GV) of diabetic with non-diabetic patients scheduled for elective surgery using USG. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 53 diabetic and 50 non-diabetic patients aged >18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status I-III having similar fasting intervals. Before induction, using standard gastric scanning protocol, qualitative and quantitative assessments of gastric antrum in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions were performed with a curved array probe. USG grade, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the antrum and GV were calculated. The gastric antrum was classified as Grade 0, 1 or 2, signifying empty antrum, fluid in RLD position only and antral fluid in both supine and RLD positions, respectively. RESULTS: In supine position, CC and AP diameters were 1.96 ± 0.41 cm and 0.9 ± 0.57 cm in control group and 2.28 ± 0.50 cm and 1.39 ± 0.44 cm in diabetic group, respectively. In RLD, CC was 2.28 ± 0.57 cm and AP was 1.24 ± 0.42 cm in control group as compared to CC 2.54 ± 0.56 cm and AP 1.82 ± 0.56 cm in diabetic group. The CSA of 2.57 ± 1.19 cm(2) and 3.73 ± 1.61 cm(2) in diabetic were significantly higher (P = 0.001) than 1.41 ± 0.55 cm(2) and 2.30 ± 1.18 cm(2) of control, in supine and RLD positions, respectively. GV was 4.20 ± 22.26 ml in control group and 9.15 ± 25.70 ml in diabetic group. CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients have higher gastric antral cross-sectional area and gastric volumes as observed by gastric ultrasound than the non-diabetic patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-05 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7286410/ /pubmed/32724247 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_796_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Garg, Heena
Podder, Subrata
Bala, Indu
Gulati, Ajay
Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study
title Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study
title_full Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study
title_fullStr Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study
title_short Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study
title_sort comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: an observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32724247
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_796_19
work_keys_str_mv AT gargheena comparisonoffastinggastricvolumeusingultrasoundindiabeticandnondiabeticpatientsinelectivesurgeryanobservationalstudy
AT poddersubrata comparisonoffastinggastricvolumeusingultrasoundindiabeticandnondiabeticpatientsinelectivesurgeryanobservationalstudy
AT balaindu comparisonoffastinggastricvolumeusingultrasoundindiabeticandnondiabeticpatientsinelectivesurgeryanobservationalstudy
AT gulatiajay comparisonoffastinggastricvolumeusingultrasoundindiabeticandnondiabeticpatientsinelectivesurgeryanobservationalstudy