Cargando…

Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams

AIM: Describe brief (less than half a day) interventions aimed at improving healthcare team functioning. METHODS: A systematic review on brief team interventions aimed at role clarification and team functioning (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018088922). Experimental or quasi-experimental studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilpatrick, Kelley, Paquette, Lysane, Jabbour, Mira, Tchouaket, Eric, Fernandez, Nicolas, Al Hakim, Grace, Landry, Véronique, Gauthier, Nathalie, Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique, Dubois, Carl-Ardy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32520943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234416
_version_ 1783544891291205632
author Kilpatrick, Kelley
Paquette, Lysane
Jabbour, Mira
Tchouaket, Eric
Fernandez, Nicolas
Al Hakim, Grace
Landry, Véronique
Gauthier, Nathalie
Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique
Dubois, Carl-Ardy
author_facet Kilpatrick, Kelley
Paquette, Lysane
Jabbour, Mira
Tchouaket, Eric
Fernandez, Nicolas
Al Hakim, Grace
Landry, Véronique
Gauthier, Nathalie
Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique
Dubois, Carl-Ardy
author_sort Kilpatrick, Kelley
collection PubMed
description AIM: Describe brief (less than half a day) interventions aimed at improving healthcare team functioning. METHODS: A systematic review on brief team interventions aimed at role clarification and team functioning (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018088922). Experimental or quasi-experimental studies were included. Database searches included CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane, RCT Registry-1990 to April 2020 and grey literature. Articles were screened independently by teams of two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed. Data from the retained articles were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer independently. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Searches yielded 1928 unique records. Final sample contained twenty papers describing 19 studies, published between 2009 and 2020. Studies described brief training interventions conducted in acute care in-patient settings and included a total of 6338 participants. Participants’ socio-demographic information was not routinely reported. Studies met between two to six of the eight risk of bias criteria. Interventions included simulations for technical skills, structured communications and speaking up for non-technical skills and debriefing. Debriefing sessions generally lasted between five to 10 minutes. Debriefing sessions reflected key content areas but it was not always possible to determine the influence of the debriefing session on participants’ learning because of the limited information reported. DISCUSSION: Interest in short team interventions is recent. Single two-hour sessions appear to improve technical skills. Three to four 30- to 60-minute training sessions spread out over several weeks with structured facilitation and debriefing appear to improve non-technical skills. Monthly meetings appear to sustain change over time. CONCLUSION: Short team interventions show promise to improve team functioning. Effectiveness of interventions in primary care and the inclusion of patients and families needs to be examined. Primary care teams are structured differently than teams in acute care and they may have different priorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7286504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72865042020-06-17 Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams Kilpatrick, Kelley Paquette, Lysane Jabbour, Mira Tchouaket, Eric Fernandez, Nicolas Al Hakim, Grace Landry, Véronique Gauthier, Nathalie Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique Dubois, Carl-Ardy PLoS One Research Article AIM: Describe brief (less than half a day) interventions aimed at improving healthcare team functioning. METHODS: A systematic review on brief team interventions aimed at role clarification and team functioning (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018088922). Experimental or quasi-experimental studies were included. Database searches included CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane, RCT Registry-1990 to April 2020 and grey literature. Articles were screened independently by teams of two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed. Data from the retained articles were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer independently. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Searches yielded 1928 unique records. Final sample contained twenty papers describing 19 studies, published between 2009 and 2020. Studies described brief training interventions conducted in acute care in-patient settings and included a total of 6338 participants. Participants’ socio-demographic information was not routinely reported. Studies met between two to six of the eight risk of bias criteria. Interventions included simulations for technical skills, structured communications and speaking up for non-technical skills and debriefing. Debriefing sessions generally lasted between five to 10 minutes. Debriefing sessions reflected key content areas but it was not always possible to determine the influence of the debriefing session on participants’ learning because of the limited information reported. DISCUSSION: Interest in short team interventions is recent. Single two-hour sessions appear to improve technical skills. Three to four 30- to 60-minute training sessions spread out over several weeks with structured facilitation and debriefing appear to improve non-technical skills. Monthly meetings appear to sustain change over time. CONCLUSION: Short team interventions show promise to improve team functioning. Effectiveness of interventions in primary care and the inclusion of patients and families needs to be examined. Primary care teams are structured differently than teams in acute care and they may have different priorities. Public Library of Science 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7286504/ /pubmed/32520943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234416 Text en © 2020 Kilpatrick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kilpatrick, Kelley
Paquette, Lysane
Jabbour, Mira
Tchouaket, Eric
Fernandez, Nicolas
Al Hakim, Grace
Landry, Véronique
Gauthier, Nathalie
Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique
Dubois, Carl-Ardy
Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams
title Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams
title_full Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams
title_fullStr Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams
title_short Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams
title_sort systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32520943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234416
work_keys_str_mv AT kilpatrickkelley systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT paquettelysane systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT jabbourmira systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT tchouaketeric systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT fernandeznicolas systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT alhakimgrace systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT landryveronique systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT gauthiernathalie systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT beaulieumariedominique systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams
AT duboiscarlardy systematicreviewofthecharacteristicsofbriefteaminterventionstoclarifyrolesandimprovefunctioninginhealthcareteams