Cargando…

Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines make vague recommendations as to exercise training (ET) type and dosage to manage chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of different ET programmes to reduce CNSNP and associated disability, and whether dosage af...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Price, Jonathan, Rushton, Alison, Tyros, Isaak, Tyros, Vasileios, Heneghan, Nicola R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32520970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234511
_version_ 1783544897601536000
author Price, Jonathan
Rushton, Alison
Tyros, Isaak
Tyros, Vasileios
Heneghan, Nicola R
author_facet Price, Jonathan
Rushton, Alison
Tyros, Isaak
Tyros, Vasileios
Heneghan, Nicola R
author_sort Price, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines make vague recommendations as to exercise training (ET) type and dosage to manage chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of different ET programmes to reduce CNSNP and associated disability, and whether dosage affects outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and data synthesis was conducted according to a published registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42018096187). A sensitive topic-based search was conducted of CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, grey literature sources and key journals from inception to 6(th) January 2020 for randomised controlled trials, investigating ET for CNSNP or disability. Two reviewers independently completed eligibility screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool) and rated the overall strength of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data was tabulated for narrative synthesis and grouped by intervention, outcome and time point to compare across studies. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials from 3990 citations (n = 2288 participants) investigated fifteen ET programmes. High RoB and low sample sizes reduced evidence quality. Clinical heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. A range of ET programmes reduce pain/disability in the short term (low to moderate evidence). Pillar exercises reduce pain/disability in the intermediate term (low level evidence). Moderate to very large pain reduction is found with ET packages that include motor control + segmental exercises (low to moderate evidence). No high-quality trials investigated long term outcomes. Increased frequency of motor control exercises and progressively increased load of pillar exercise may improve effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Motor control + segmental exercises are the most effective ET to reduce short term pain/disability, but long-term outcomes have not been investigated. Optimal motor control + segmental exercise variables and dosage is unknown and requires clarification. An adequately powered, low RoB trial is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and optimal dosage of motor control + segmental on long term outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018096187
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7286530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72865302020-06-15 Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis Price, Jonathan Rushton, Alison Tyros, Isaak Tyros, Vasileios Heneghan, Nicola R PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines make vague recommendations as to exercise training (ET) type and dosage to manage chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of different ET programmes to reduce CNSNP and associated disability, and whether dosage affects outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and data synthesis was conducted according to a published registered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42018096187). A sensitive topic-based search was conducted of CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, grey literature sources and key journals from inception to 6(th) January 2020 for randomised controlled trials, investigating ET for CNSNP or disability. Two reviewers independently completed eligibility screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool) and rated the overall strength of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data was tabulated for narrative synthesis and grouped by intervention, outcome and time point to compare across studies. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials from 3990 citations (n = 2288 participants) investigated fifteen ET programmes. High RoB and low sample sizes reduced evidence quality. Clinical heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. A range of ET programmes reduce pain/disability in the short term (low to moderate evidence). Pillar exercises reduce pain/disability in the intermediate term (low level evidence). Moderate to very large pain reduction is found with ET packages that include motor control + segmental exercises (low to moderate evidence). No high-quality trials investigated long term outcomes. Increased frequency of motor control exercises and progressively increased load of pillar exercise may improve effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Motor control + segmental exercises are the most effective ET to reduce short term pain/disability, but long-term outcomes have not been investigated. Optimal motor control + segmental exercise variables and dosage is unknown and requires clarification. An adequately powered, low RoB trial is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and optimal dosage of motor control + segmental on long term outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018096187 Public Library of Science 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7286530/ /pubmed/32520970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234511 Text en © 2020 Price et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Price, Jonathan
Rushton, Alison
Tyros, Isaak
Tyros, Vasileios
Heneghan, Nicola R
Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis
title Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis
title_full Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis
title_short Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis
title_sort effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: a systematic review with a narrative synthesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32520970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234511
work_keys_str_mv AT pricejonathan effectivenessandoptimaldosageofexercisetrainingforchronicnonspecificneckpainasystematicreviewwithanarrativesynthesis
AT rushtonalison effectivenessandoptimaldosageofexercisetrainingforchronicnonspecificneckpainasystematicreviewwithanarrativesynthesis
AT tyrosisaak effectivenessandoptimaldosageofexercisetrainingforchronicnonspecificneckpainasystematicreviewwithanarrativesynthesis
AT tyrosvasileios effectivenessandoptimaldosageofexercisetrainingforchronicnonspecificneckpainasystematicreviewwithanarrativesynthesis
AT heneghannicolar effectivenessandoptimaldosageofexercisetrainingforchronicnonspecificneckpainasystematicreviewwithanarrativesynthesis