Cargando…
Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review
Apnea is one of the three cardinal findings in brain death (BD). Apnea testing (AT) is physiologically and practically complex. We sought to review described modifications of AT, safety and complication rates, monitoring techniques, performance of AT on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), an...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0 |
_version_ | 1783544906873044992 |
---|---|
author | Busl, Katharina M. Lewis, Ariane Varelas, Panayiotis N. |
author_facet | Busl, Katharina M. Lewis, Ariane Varelas, Panayiotis N. |
author_sort | Busl, Katharina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Apnea is one of the three cardinal findings in brain death (BD). Apnea testing (AT) is physiologically and practically complex. We sought to review described modifications of AT, safety and complication rates, monitoring techniques, performance of AT on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and other relevant considerations regarding AT. We conducted a systematic scoping review to answer these questions by searching the literature on AT in English language available in PubMed or EMBASE since 1980. Pediatric or animal studies were excluded. A total of 87 articles matched our inclusion criteria and were qualitatively synthesized in this review. A large body of the literature on AT since its inception addresses a variety of modifications, monitoring techniques, complication rates, ways to perform AT on ECMO, and other considerations such as variability in protocols, lack of uniform awareness, and legal considerations. Only some modifications are widely used, especially methods to maintain oxygenation, and most are not standardized or endorsed by brain death guidelines. Future updates to AT protocols and strive for unification of such protocols are desirable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7286635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72866352020-06-11 Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review Busl, Katharina M. Lewis, Ariane Varelas, Panayiotis N. Neurocrit Care Review Article Apnea is one of the three cardinal findings in brain death (BD). Apnea testing (AT) is physiologically and practically complex. We sought to review described modifications of AT, safety and complication rates, monitoring techniques, performance of AT on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and other relevant considerations regarding AT. We conducted a systematic scoping review to answer these questions by searching the literature on AT in English language available in PubMed or EMBASE since 1980. Pediatric or animal studies were excluded. A total of 87 articles matched our inclusion criteria and were qualitatively synthesized in this review. A large body of the literature on AT since its inception addresses a variety of modifications, monitoring techniques, complication rates, ways to perform AT on ECMO, and other considerations such as variability in protocols, lack of uniform awareness, and legal considerations. Only some modifications are widely used, especially methods to maintain oxygenation, and most are not standardized or endorsed by brain death guidelines. Future updates to AT protocols and strive for unification of such protocols are desirable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-06-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7286635/ /pubmed/32524528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Busl, Katharina M. Lewis, Ariane Varelas, Panayiotis N. Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title | Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_full | Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_short | Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review |
title_sort | apnea testing for the determination of brain death: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32524528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buslkatharinam apneatestingforthedeterminationofbraindeathasystematicscopingreview AT lewisariane apneatestingforthedeterminationofbraindeathasystematicscopingreview AT varelaspanayiotisn apneatestingforthedeterminationofbraindeathasystematicscopingreview |