Cargando…

Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: Boost radiation using brachytherapy (BT) is a standard treatment for local disease control in concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for advanced cervical cancer. However, it is associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary complications. Hence, this study investigates the feasibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seongmin, Lee, Sanghoon, Hong, Jin Hwa, Park, Young Je, Song, Jae Yun, Lee, Jae Kwan, Lee, Nak Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e42
_version_ 1783544930405187584
author Kim, Seongmin
Lee, Sanghoon
Hong, Jin Hwa
Park, Young Je
Song, Jae Yun
Lee, Jae Kwan
Lee, Nak Woo
author_facet Kim, Seongmin
Lee, Sanghoon
Hong, Jin Hwa
Park, Young Je
Song, Jae Yun
Lee, Jae Kwan
Lee, Nak Woo
author_sort Kim, Seongmin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Boost radiation using brachytherapy (BT) is a standard treatment for local disease control in concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for advanced cervical cancer. However, it is associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary complications. Hence, this study investigates the feasibility of helical tomotherapy (HT) as an alternative to BT. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent CCRT between 2000 and 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage IIB–IVA cancers were selected based on the 2009 criteria of The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. External beam radiation combined with chemotherapy was followed by either BT or HT. The propensity score matching of both groups was calculated using logistic regression analysis. Disease outcomes and treatment-related adverse events were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The matched population included 70 BT patients and 35 HT patients. The 5-year progression-free survival rates for BT and HT were 72.6% and 72.5%, respectively (p=0.721). There was no difference in the overall survival rate between the two groups (p=0.203). The presence of acute and chronic gastrointestinal complications was also similar between the groups (p=0.460 and p=0.563, respectively). The chronic genitourinary toxicities were also comparable (p=0.105). CONCLUSIONS: HT boost treatment showed comparable disease outcomes with those observed with conventional BT in patients with advanced cervical cancer. HT could be a complementary boost protocol as a single modality or hybrid with BT in selected patients. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7286762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72867622020-07-01 Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer Kim, Seongmin Lee, Sanghoon Hong, Jin Hwa Park, Young Je Song, Jae Yun Lee, Jae Kwan Lee, Nak Woo J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Boost radiation using brachytherapy (BT) is a standard treatment for local disease control in concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for advanced cervical cancer. However, it is associated with gastrointestinal and genitourinary complications. Hence, this study investigates the feasibility of helical tomotherapy (HT) as an alternative to BT. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent CCRT between 2000 and 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage IIB–IVA cancers were selected based on the 2009 criteria of The International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. External beam radiation combined with chemotherapy was followed by either BT or HT. The propensity score matching of both groups was calculated using logistic regression analysis. Disease outcomes and treatment-related adverse events were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The matched population included 70 BT patients and 35 HT patients. The 5-year progression-free survival rates for BT and HT were 72.6% and 72.5%, respectively (p=0.721). There was no difference in the overall survival rate between the two groups (p=0.203). The presence of acute and chronic gastrointestinal complications was also similar between the groups (p=0.460 and p=0.563, respectively). The chronic genitourinary toxicities were also comparable (p=0.105). CONCLUSIONS: HT boost treatment showed comparable disease outcomes with those observed with conventional BT in patients with advanced cervical cancer. HT could be a complementary boost protocol as a single modality or hybrid with BT in selected patients. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm long-term outcomes. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7286762/ /pubmed/32026658 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e42 Text en Copyright © 2020. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Seongmin
Lee, Sanghoon
Hong, Jin Hwa
Park, Young Je
Song, Jae Yun
Lee, Jae Kwan
Lee, Nak Woo
Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
title Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
title_full Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
title_fullStr Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
title_short Comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
title_sort comparing efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy versus helical tomotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026658
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e42
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseongmin comparingefficacyofhighdoseratebrachytherapyversushelicaltomotherapyinthetreatmentofcervicalcancer
AT leesanghoon comparingefficacyofhighdoseratebrachytherapyversushelicaltomotherapyinthetreatmentofcervicalcancer
AT hongjinhwa comparingefficacyofhighdoseratebrachytherapyversushelicaltomotherapyinthetreatmentofcervicalcancer
AT parkyoungje comparingefficacyofhighdoseratebrachytherapyversushelicaltomotherapyinthetreatmentofcervicalcancer
AT songjaeyun comparingefficacyofhighdoseratebrachytherapyversushelicaltomotherapyinthetreatmentofcervicalcancer
AT leejaekwan comparingefficacyofhighdoseratebrachytherapyversushelicaltomotherapyinthetreatmentofcervicalcancer
AT leenakwoo comparingefficacyofhighdoseratebrachytherapyversushelicaltomotherapyinthetreatmentofcervicalcancer