Cargando…

The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study

There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horshauge, Petricia Marie, Gabel, Pernille, Larsen, Mette Bach, Kirkegaard, Pia, Edwards, Adrian, Andersen, Berit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132
_version_ 1783545041281613824
author Horshauge, Petricia Marie
Gabel, Pernille
Larsen, Mette Bach
Kirkegaard, Pia
Edwards, Adrian
Andersen, Berit
author_facet Horshauge, Petricia Marie
Gabel, Pernille
Larsen, Mette Bach
Kirkegaard, Pia
Edwards, Adrian
Andersen, Berit
author_sort Horshauge, Petricia Marie
collection PubMed
description There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics and worry and attitude variables modify this association. In a cross-sectional study, 10,030 53–74-year-old randomly selected citizens resident in Central Denmark Region received a questionnaire assessing health literacy using the European Health Literacy Survey Short Scale 16-item. Data on colorectal cancer screening uptake were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database, and socioeconomic and -demographic data were linked from Statistics Denmark. The response rate was 71% (n = 7142). Odds ratio (OR) for uptake was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.19) for problematic health literacy and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.16) for inadequate health literacy, when using adequate health literacy as the reference value. The association was not modified by socioeconomic or -demographic characteristics, worry or attitude. No association was found between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Future research needs to clarify which dimensions of health literacy may predict screening uptake and how it is best measured.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7287294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72872942020-06-17 The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study Horshauge, Petricia Marie Gabel, Pernille Larsen, Mette Bach Kirkegaard, Pia Edwards, Adrian Andersen, Berit Prev Med Rep Regular Article There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics and worry and attitude variables modify this association. In a cross-sectional study, 10,030 53–74-year-old randomly selected citizens resident in Central Denmark Region received a questionnaire assessing health literacy using the European Health Literacy Survey Short Scale 16-item. Data on colorectal cancer screening uptake were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database, and socioeconomic and -demographic data were linked from Statistics Denmark. The response rate was 71% (n = 7142). Odds ratio (OR) for uptake was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.19) for problematic health literacy and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.16) for inadequate health literacy, when using adequate health literacy as the reference value. The association was not modified by socioeconomic or -demographic characteristics, worry or attitude. No association was found between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Future research needs to clarify which dimensions of health literacy may predict screening uptake and how it is best measured. 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7287294/ /pubmed/32551215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Horshauge, Petricia Marie
Gabel, Pernille
Larsen, Mette Bach
Kirkegaard, Pia
Edwards, Adrian
Andersen, Berit
The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study
title The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study
title_full The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study
title_fullStr The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study
title_short The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study
title_sort association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in denmark: cross-sectional study
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132
work_keys_str_mv AT horshaugepetriciamarie theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT gabelpernille theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT larsenmettebach theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT kirkegaardpia theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT edwardsadrian theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT andersenberit theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT horshaugepetriciamarie associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT gabelpernille associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT larsenmettebach associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT kirkegaardpia associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT edwardsadrian associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy
AT andersenberit associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy