Cargando…
The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study
There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132 |
_version_ | 1783545041281613824 |
---|---|
author | Horshauge, Petricia Marie Gabel, Pernille Larsen, Mette Bach Kirkegaard, Pia Edwards, Adrian Andersen, Berit |
author_facet | Horshauge, Petricia Marie Gabel, Pernille Larsen, Mette Bach Kirkegaard, Pia Edwards, Adrian Andersen, Berit |
author_sort | Horshauge, Petricia Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics and worry and attitude variables modify this association. In a cross-sectional study, 10,030 53–74-year-old randomly selected citizens resident in Central Denmark Region received a questionnaire assessing health literacy using the European Health Literacy Survey Short Scale 16-item. Data on colorectal cancer screening uptake were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database, and socioeconomic and -demographic data were linked from Statistics Denmark. The response rate was 71% (n = 7142). Odds ratio (OR) for uptake was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.19) for problematic health literacy and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.16) for inadequate health literacy, when using adequate health literacy as the reference value. The association was not modified by socioeconomic or -demographic characteristics, worry or attitude. No association was found between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Future research needs to clarify which dimensions of health literacy may predict screening uptake and how it is best measured. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7287294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72872942020-06-17 The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study Horshauge, Petricia Marie Gabel, Pernille Larsen, Mette Bach Kirkegaard, Pia Edwards, Adrian Andersen, Berit Prev Med Rep Regular Article There are multiple reasons for not participating in colorectal cancer screening, but the role of health literacy in screening uptake is not well understood. The aims of this study were to determine the association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake and to explore whether socioeconomic and -demographic characteristics and worry and attitude variables modify this association. In a cross-sectional study, 10,030 53–74-year-old randomly selected citizens resident in Central Denmark Region received a questionnaire assessing health literacy using the European Health Literacy Survey Short Scale 16-item. Data on colorectal cancer screening uptake were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database, and socioeconomic and -demographic data were linked from Statistics Denmark. The response rate was 71% (n = 7142). Odds ratio (OR) for uptake was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.19) for problematic health literacy and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.16) for inadequate health literacy, when using adequate health literacy as the reference value. The association was not modified by socioeconomic or -demographic characteristics, worry or attitude. No association was found between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Future research needs to clarify which dimensions of health literacy may predict screening uptake and how it is best measured. 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7287294/ /pubmed/32551215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Horshauge, Petricia Marie Gabel, Pernille Larsen, Mette Bach Kirkegaard, Pia Edwards, Adrian Andersen, Berit The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study |
title | The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study |
title_full | The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study |
title_short | The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study |
title_sort | association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in denmark: cross-sectional study |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horshaugepetriciamarie theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT gabelpernille theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT larsenmettebach theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT kirkegaardpia theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT edwardsadrian theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT andersenberit theassociationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT horshaugepetriciamarie associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT gabelpernille associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT larsenmettebach associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT kirkegaardpia associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT edwardsadrian associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy AT andersenberit associationbetweenhealthliteracyandcolorectalcancerscreeninguptakeinapubliclyfundedscreeningprogramindenmarkcrosssectionalstudy |