Cargando…

Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors

Technology innovation in sanitation is needed for the 4.2 billion people worldwide, lacking safely managed sanitation services. A major requirement for the adoption of these technologies is the management of malodor around toilet and treatment systems. There is an unmet need for a low-cost instrumen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawadiya, Siddharth, Welling, Claire, Grego, Sonia, Deshusses, Marc A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32443709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102888
_version_ 1783545089584267264
author Kawadiya, Siddharth
Welling, Claire
Grego, Sonia
Deshusses, Marc A.
author_facet Kawadiya, Siddharth
Welling, Claire
Grego, Sonia
Deshusses, Marc A.
author_sort Kawadiya, Siddharth
collection PubMed
description Technology innovation in sanitation is needed for the 4.2 billion people worldwide, lacking safely managed sanitation services. A major requirement for the adoption of these technologies is the management of malodor around toilet and treatment systems. There is an unmet need for a low-cost instrumented technology for detecting the onset of sanitation malodor and triggering corrective actions. This study combines sensory data with low-cost gas sensor data on malodor emanating from feces. The response of 10 commercial electrochemical gas sensors was collected alongside olfactometric measurements. Odor from fecal specimens at different relevant dilution as well as specimens with pleasant odors as a control were evaluated for a total of 64 responses. Several of the sensors responded positively to the fecal odor, with the formaldehyde, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia sensors featuring the highest signal to noise ratio. A positive trend was observed between the sensors’ responses and the concentration of the odorant and with odor intensity, but no clear correspondence with dilution to threshold (D/T) values was found. Selected sensors were responsive both above and below the intensity values used as the cutoff for offensive odor, suggesting the possibility of using those sensors to differentiate odor offensiveness based just on the magnitude of their response. The specificity of the sensors suggested that discrimination between the selected non-fecal and fecal odors was possible. This study demonstrates that some of the evaluated sensors could be used to assemble a low-cost malodor warning system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7287618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72876182020-06-15 Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors Kawadiya, Siddharth Welling, Claire Grego, Sonia Deshusses, Marc A. Sensors (Basel) Article Technology innovation in sanitation is needed for the 4.2 billion people worldwide, lacking safely managed sanitation services. A major requirement for the adoption of these technologies is the management of malodor around toilet and treatment systems. There is an unmet need for a low-cost instrumented technology for detecting the onset of sanitation malodor and triggering corrective actions. This study combines sensory data with low-cost gas sensor data on malodor emanating from feces. The response of 10 commercial electrochemical gas sensors was collected alongside olfactometric measurements. Odor from fecal specimens at different relevant dilution as well as specimens with pleasant odors as a control were evaluated for a total of 64 responses. Several of the sensors responded positively to the fecal odor, with the formaldehyde, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia sensors featuring the highest signal to noise ratio. A positive trend was observed between the sensors’ responses and the concentration of the odorant and with odor intensity, but no clear correspondence with dilution to threshold (D/T) values was found. Selected sensors were responsive both above and below the intensity values used as the cutoff for offensive odor, suggesting the possibility of using those sensors to differentiate odor offensiveness based just on the magnitude of their response. The specificity of the sensors suggested that discrimination between the selected non-fecal and fecal odors was possible. This study demonstrates that some of the evaluated sensors could be used to assemble a low-cost malodor warning system. MDPI 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7287618/ /pubmed/32443709 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102888 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kawadiya, Siddharth
Welling, Claire
Grego, Sonia
Deshusses, Marc A.
Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors
title Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors
title_full Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors
title_fullStr Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors
title_short Fecal Malodor Detection Using Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors
title_sort fecal malodor detection using low-cost electrochemical sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32443709
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20102888
work_keys_str_mv AT kawadiyasiddharth fecalmalodordetectionusinglowcostelectrochemicalsensors
AT wellingclaire fecalmalodordetectionusinglowcostelectrochemicalsensors
AT gregosonia fecalmalodordetectionusinglowcostelectrochemicalsensors
AT deshussesmarca fecalmalodordetectionusinglowcostelectrochemicalsensors