Cargando…

Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces

Wettability, roughness and surface treatment methods are essential for the majority of practical applications, where liquid–solid surface interactions take place. The present study experimentally investigated the influence of different mechanical surface treatment methods on the static wettability o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fedorova, Nataliia, Ottinger, Bettina, Jovicic, Vojislav, Zbogar-Rasic, Ana, Delgado, Antonio, Virtanen, Sannakaisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32414102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13102240
_version_ 1783545090301493248
author Fedorova, Nataliia
Ottinger, Bettina
Jovicic, Vojislav
Zbogar-Rasic, Ana
Delgado, Antonio
Virtanen, Sannakaisa
author_facet Fedorova, Nataliia
Ottinger, Bettina
Jovicic, Vojislav
Zbogar-Rasic, Ana
Delgado, Antonio
Virtanen, Sannakaisa
author_sort Fedorova, Nataliia
collection PubMed
description Wettability, roughness and surface treatment methods are essential for the majority of practical applications, where liquid–solid surface interactions take place. The present study experimentally investigated the influence of different mechanical surface treatment methods on the static wettability of uncoated and amphiphobic-coated aluminium alloy (AlMg(3)) samples, specially focusing on the interaction between surface finishing and coating. Five different surfaces were prepared: as-received substrate, polished, sandpapered, fleece-abraded and sandblasted. After characterisation, the samples were spray-coated using an amphiphobic coating. The characterisation of the uncoated and coated samples involved measurements of the roughness parameters and the apparent contact angles of demineralized water and rapeseed oil. The coating was initially characterised regarding its adhesion to the sample and elevated temperature stability. The applied surface treatments resulted in the scattered sample roughness in the range of Sa = 0.3–15.8 µm, water contact angles of [Formula: see text] = 78°–106° and extremely low oil contact angles. Coating the samples more than doubled the surface roughness to Sa = 13.3–29 µm, whereas the initial surface treatment properties (structure, anisotropy, etc.) were entirely repressed by the coating properties. Coating led the water contact angles to increase to [Formula: see text] = 162°–173° and even more pronounced oil contact angles to increase to [Formula: see text] = 139°–150°, classifying the surfaces as superhydrophobic and oleophobic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7287621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72876212020-06-15 Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces Fedorova, Nataliia Ottinger, Bettina Jovicic, Vojislav Zbogar-Rasic, Ana Delgado, Antonio Virtanen, Sannakaisa Materials (Basel) Article Wettability, roughness and surface treatment methods are essential for the majority of practical applications, where liquid–solid surface interactions take place. The present study experimentally investigated the influence of different mechanical surface treatment methods on the static wettability of uncoated and amphiphobic-coated aluminium alloy (AlMg(3)) samples, specially focusing on the interaction between surface finishing and coating. Five different surfaces were prepared: as-received substrate, polished, sandpapered, fleece-abraded and sandblasted. After characterisation, the samples were spray-coated using an amphiphobic coating. The characterisation of the uncoated and coated samples involved measurements of the roughness parameters and the apparent contact angles of demineralized water and rapeseed oil. The coating was initially characterised regarding its adhesion to the sample and elevated temperature stability. The applied surface treatments resulted in the scattered sample roughness in the range of Sa = 0.3–15.8 µm, water contact angles of [Formula: see text] = 78°–106° and extremely low oil contact angles. Coating the samples more than doubled the surface roughness to Sa = 13.3–29 µm, whereas the initial surface treatment properties (structure, anisotropy, etc.) were entirely repressed by the coating properties. Coating led the water contact angles to increase to [Formula: see text] = 162°–173° and even more pronounced oil contact angles to increase to [Formula: see text] = 139°–150°, classifying the surfaces as superhydrophobic and oleophobic. MDPI 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7287621/ /pubmed/32414102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13102240 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fedorova, Nataliia
Ottinger, Bettina
Jovicic, Vojislav
Zbogar-Rasic, Ana
Delgado, Antonio
Virtanen, Sannakaisa
Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces
title Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces
title_full Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces
title_fullStr Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces
title_short Static Wettability of Differently Mechanically Treated and Amphiphobic-Coated Aluminium Surfaces
title_sort static wettability of differently mechanically treated and amphiphobic-coated aluminium surfaces
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32414102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13102240
work_keys_str_mv AT fedorovanataliia staticwettabilityofdifferentlymechanicallytreatedandamphiphobiccoatedaluminiumsurfaces
AT ottingerbettina staticwettabilityofdifferentlymechanicallytreatedandamphiphobiccoatedaluminiumsurfaces
AT jovicicvojislav staticwettabilityofdifferentlymechanicallytreatedandamphiphobiccoatedaluminiumsurfaces
AT zbogarrasicana staticwettabilityofdifferentlymechanicallytreatedandamphiphobiccoatedaluminiumsurfaces
AT delgadoantonio staticwettabilityofdifferentlymechanicallytreatedandamphiphobiccoatedaluminiumsurfaces
AT virtanensannakaisa staticwettabilityofdifferentlymechanicallytreatedandamphiphobiccoatedaluminiumsurfaces