Cargando…
Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study
Background: To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontic micro-implants (n = 44; 14 women, 8 men). Methods: PBM with 808 nm diode laser was applied immediately, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 30 days post the implantation. Results were assessed within same time frames and additionally aft...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13102265 |
_version_ | 1783545129964929024 |
---|---|
author | Matys, Jacek Flieger, Rafał Gedrange, Tomasz Janowicz, Krzysztof Kempisty, Bartosz Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Dominiak, Marzena |
author_facet | Matys, Jacek Flieger, Rafał Gedrange, Tomasz Janowicz, Krzysztof Kempisty, Bartosz Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Dominiak, Marzena |
author_sort | Matys, Jacek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontic micro-implants (n = 44; 14 women, 8 men). Methods: PBM with 808 nm diode laser was applied immediately, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 30 days post the implantation. Results were assessed within same time frames and additionally after 60 days to check for implants stability using the Periotest device. Patients pain experiences following the first day post-treatment and potential loss of micro-implants after 60 days were recorded. The procedure involved insertion of mini-implants in the maxilla for the laser group (L, n = 22) and negative control group (C, n = 22). Irradiation was carried buccally and palatally with respect to the maxillary ridge (2 points). The energy per point was 4 J (8 J/cm(2)), total dose was 56 J. Results: Patients did not report significant differences in terms of pain experiences comparing the L and C groups (p = 0.499). At 30 days post-treatment, higher secondary stability of implants was observed in the laser group (Periotest Test Value, PTV 6.32 ± 3.62), in contrast to the controls (PTV 11.34 ± 5.76) (p = 0.004). At 60 days post-treatment, significantly higher stability was recorded in the laser group (PTV 6.55 ± 4.66) compared with the controls, PTV (10.95 ± 4.77) (p = 0.009). Conclusions: Application of the 808 nm diode laser increased secondary micro-implant stability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7287787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72877872020-06-15 Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study Matys, Jacek Flieger, Rafał Gedrange, Tomasz Janowicz, Krzysztof Kempisty, Bartosz Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Dominiak, Marzena Materials (Basel) Article Background: To evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontic micro-implants (n = 44; 14 women, 8 men). Methods: PBM with 808 nm diode laser was applied immediately, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 30 days post the implantation. Results were assessed within same time frames and additionally after 60 days to check for implants stability using the Periotest device. Patients pain experiences following the first day post-treatment and potential loss of micro-implants after 60 days were recorded. The procedure involved insertion of mini-implants in the maxilla for the laser group (L, n = 22) and negative control group (C, n = 22). Irradiation was carried buccally and palatally with respect to the maxillary ridge (2 points). The energy per point was 4 J (8 J/cm(2)), total dose was 56 J. Results: Patients did not report significant differences in terms of pain experiences comparing the L and C groups (p = 0.499). At 30 days post-treatment, higher secondary stability of implants was observed in the laser group (Periotest Test Value, PTV 6.32 ± 3.62), in contrast to the controls (PTV 11.34 ± 5.76) (p = 0.004). At 60 days post-treatment, significantly higher stability was recorded in the laser group (PTV 6.55 ± 4.66) compared with the controls, PTV (10.95 ± 4.77) (p = 0.009). Conclusions: Application of the 808 nm diode laser increased secondary micro-implant stability. MDPI 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7287787/ /pubmed/32423127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13102265 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Matys, Jacek Flieger, Rafał Gedrange, Tomasz Janowicz, Krzysztof Kempisty, Bartosz Grzech-Leśniak, Kinga Dominiak, Marzena Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study |
title | Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_full | Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_fullStr | Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_short | Effect of 808 nm Semiconductor Laser on the Stability of Orthodontic Micro-Implants: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_sort | effect of 808 nm semiconductor laser on the stability of orthodontic micro-implants: a split-mouth study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32423127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13102265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matysjacek effectof808nmsemiconductorlaseronthestabilityoforthodonticmicroimplantsasplitmouthstudy AT fliegerrafał effectof808nmsemiconductorlaseronthestabilityoforthodonticmicroimplantsasplitmouthstudy AT gedrangetomasz effectof808nmsemiconductorlaseronthestabilityoforthodonticmicroimplantsasplitmouthstudy AT janowiczkrzysztof effectof808nmsemiconductorlaseronthestabilityoforthodonticmicroimplantsasplitmouthstudy AT kempistybartosz effectof808nmsemiconductorlaseronthestabilityoforthodonticmicroimplantsasplitmouthstudy AT grzechlesniakkinga effectof808nmsemiconductorlaseronthestabilityoforthodonticmicroimplantsasplitmouthstudy AT dominiakmarzena effectof808nmsemiconductorlaseronthestabilityoforthodonticmicroimplantsasplitmouthstudy |